metascience

Check Research Outputs for Best Practices

👁️‍🗨️ Scientists often do the same bad stuff. Automate giving deterministic feedback during peer review with determinstic (LLM-free)

Replication Resources (code+data) for "Causal Claims in Economics" by Garg P. and Fetzer T. (2026)

Online service for analyzing research profiles of scientists and conferences

Open-source research tool for browsing suggested questions in economics from the literature.

Distributed integrity infrastructure for collusion-resistant independent verification. Blind peer validation of any verifiable claim — scientific, regulatory, or institutional — recorded as tamper-evident Harmony Records. Built in Rust on Holochain.

Data repository of the results for the COVID-19 Tournament of the Behavioral and Social Science Forecasting Collaborative

A list of awesome resources for information extraction from PDFs for metascientific research

a community version of Unfold Research monorepo

Retrieves scientific article abstracts, applies tagging to categorize them, and uploads the results to your MySQL server.

This proof-of-concept service syncs Octopus publications to ATProto / Bluesky network.

ZfP 2024: Tool to predict prevalence of positive results in scientific abstracts.

Description of the method and the codes for the World after Covid project, along with data, and main analyses.

A workflow for identifying generalizations in humanities articles.

Discover the hidden costs behind publishing your research. Estimates how much an academic author, institution, or funder has spent on publication fees, including the % of for profit publishers. Contributions welcome!

AWARE is a decision support tool for Avoiding WAste in health REsearch. It allows users to upload studies and assess their value for decision-making. In development.

MLKN.lab — Multi-Layered Knowledge Network Ideas Laboratory — MLKN.lab is a computational metascience initiative dedicated to mapping, modeling, and quantifying the epistemic topology of global scientific discovery.

AI Journal of Arts & Metascience (AIJAM)

GEneric NEuro MEtadata DEscriptors

Answers "where should I submit this paper?" from cited soft metadata — reviewer culture, framing requirements, real word limits — instead of model recall. 399 curated journal entries, a 166,821-journal ISSN spine, and blanks where nobody actually knows.