You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Stage 1. The README's current comparison table (LangGraph / CrewAI / Claude Code subagents) skips every competitor the category actually discusses.
Evidence
The above/beside-Agent-Teams conversation is being written without us: "Move over Gas Town, Claude Has First-Party Agent Orchestration" [verified: https://www.alilleybrinker.com/blog/move-over-gas-town/] and the Dynamic Workflows HN thread's category roundup names four tools, none ours [verified: https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/items/48313051]
Verifiable Agent Teams limitations for an honest table: experimental flag, single-machine scope, no teammate session resumption, no worktree isolation, ~7x token cost in plan mode. [verified: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/agent-teams.md, https://code.claude.com/docs/en/costs.md]
Honest-losses column included (Agent Teams: first-party, zero-install, free of our 7-prereq setup; Gas Town: 17.5k stars of community; we are 3 stars and AGPL) — the honesty is what makes it citable
README table gains an Agent Teams row linking to the full page
Every cell sourced to a URL in the page footer
Filed by the product-manager cycle af-147a1678; approved by operator: #98 (comment)
Stage 1. The README's current comparison table (LangGraph / CrewAI / Claude Code subagents) skips every competitor the category actually discusses.
Evidence
Acceptance criteria
Filed by the product-manager cycle af-147a1678; approved by operator: #98 (comment)