Repository navigation
Unchanged coverage treated as a Coverage evolution decrease聽#756
Description
Activity
I would expect to see: 馃煝 Coverage evolution: 94% = 94% 馃煝
the
>doesn't stand forgreaterbut forwent from x to y. I've replaced it with an arrow (in addition to solving the floating point bug)(... I think :D)Reacted by john gravois, Kegan Maher and Scott Cranfillthe
>doesn't stand for greaterah. in this case i agree that an arrow is an improvement!
(in addition to solving the floating point bug)(... I think :D)
rock n roll! 馃幐 i'll update and let you know if i see anything unexpected.
thanks for engaging!
edit: looks great to me! cal-itp/benefits#4113
@ewjoachim thank you so much for the quick fix here!
Reacted by Joachim JablonYou're welcome. Thanks for raising this.
greetings and thank you for maintaining this awesome github action! 馃憢
i've noticed some counter-intuitive behavior in my own project. is it by design that only an increase in coverage results in a green 'Coverage evolution' badge?
live example: cal-itp/benefits#4103 (comment)
perhaps its just a quirk/misconfiguration on my end? I would expect to see: 馃煝 Coverage evolution: 94% = 94% 馃煝