Skip to content

Core API comment re defects per LoC #565

Description

@jmcp

I'm going through the online draft and noticed this comment at http://guide.couchdb.org/draft/api.html (just before Documents in Detail):

Another reason CouchDB uses MVCC is that this model is simpler conceptually and, as
a consequence, easier to program. CouchDB uses less code to make this work, and less
code is always good because the ratio of defects per lines of code is static.

I do not think that this is expressed very well.

The number of lines of code is not necessarily correlated with the number of defects, and that ratio can change over time (hopefully approaching 0). A better way to express this paragraph might go something like this:

Another reason CouchDB uses MVCC is that this model is simpler conceptually and, as
a consequence, easier to program. CouchDB uses less code to make this work, and that
means fewer opportunities for defects (or bugs) to exist.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions