Repository navigation
Archive amend-worker-input-budget-dispatch-wording: promote the reworded rationale sentence onto doc-health - #1269
Merged
brettheap merged 4 commits intoOct 8, 2026
Conversation
The archive wrapper refuses while any "- [ ]" remains (scripts/proposal-support.py:4632-4633), and the packet kept 3.5 and 4.1 open deliberately, for the acts that tick them. This follows e37ab6b, which ticked its own section 4 right before archive 0b1e826. - 3.5: #1264 landed by squash as a936e53 from head a2761b1. At that head: 15 check names, every one concluded success, neutral or skipped; Copilot's review 5441620162; 4 review thread(s), 0 unresolved. - 4.1: performed in this archive pull request on Brett Heap's word "archive it after it lands" (RULED 2026-10-07T11:04:36Z, opensoft/brett-wip commit cd962505), through the governed wrapper, on a branch cut fresh from main a936e53 after the squash. No requirement or scenario text moves. Refs #1262 Lane: openxfactory-1 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ded rationale sentence onto doc-health On Brett Heap's archive word, verbatim "archive it after it lands" (2026-10-07, in session to lane openxfactory-1; RULED in opensoft/brett-wip lanes/log/openxfactory-1.md at 2026-10-07T11:04:36Z, commit cd962505), given for after the ratification pull request #1264 landed. It landed by squash as a936e53, the ratifying commit the origin-retention gate compares against. This branch is cut fresh from main at a936e53 and carries none of #1264's pre-squash commits. code_surface is none, so under release-realization the packet archives on landing plus its own task list. No realization evidence is owed: the realization (#1137 -> 9da52e3) already never dispatches a unit it measured over the budget (tasks.md 1.1). Performed through the governed wrapper, never a bare openspec archive: TZ=UTC python3 scripts/proposal-support.py . archive \ amend-worker-input-budget-dispatch-wording --yes exit 0: "ORIGIN RETAINED amend-worker-input-budget-dispatch-wording (declaration unchanged since the ratifying commit a936e53)", "Applying changes to openspec/specs/doc-health/spec.md: ~ 1 modified", "Totals: + 0, ~ 1, - 0, → 0", "Change 'amend-worker-input-budget-dispatch-wording' archived as '2026-10-08-amend-worker-input-budget-dispatch-wording'", over the content-addressed @fission-ai/openspec@1.12.0 pin. --date was not passed, so the directory takes today in UTC. The run started at 2026-10-08T16:18:37Z, and this commit, the directory's adding commit, carries the same UTC day. THE PROMOTION IS THE DELTA AS WRITTEN, measured on both sides: the block is extracted by its heading from the archived delta and from canon, and hashed. doc-health is the only capability the delta touches. - MODIFIED "Bounded worker input budget": 3,595 bytes before, 3,771 bytes now; sha256 83326fa0f49f6e7c... on the archived delta and canon alike. Only the second paragraph moves (2 lines out, 5 in). The title, the first and third paragraphs and all 6 scenarios are byte-identical. - The preamble and the other 43 requirement blocks are byte-identical. Requirements stay 44, scenarios stay 267, and canon --numstat reads +5 -2. - #1262 acceptance 3: canon carries #1262's sentence once, and neither the old sentence nor "conformant but useless" anywhere. The five packet files move as R100 pure renames. Also in this commit: - the README OpenSpec Records bullet moves from Active to the head of Archived; its pull-request link is the ARCHIVE-PR-NUMBER-PENDING marker, which a later commit replaces once the pull request exists; - the modified-block-currency self-gate's one _LEDGER_SUBJECTS row for this block retires on its own stated condition, leaving 13 literal entries and 12 unique. The archived delta of add-worker-input-budget is not edited. Closing #1262 needs its own word. Refs #1262 Lane: openxfactory-1 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reviewer's GuideThis PR archives the already-ratified amendment via the governed wrapper, relocates and documents its packet, promotes its reworded rationale into the canonical doc-health requirement, and retires the corresponding modified-block-currency finding while preserving the required audit measurements and landing provenance. Flow diagram for archiving and promoting the amendmentflowchart LR
A[Ratified amendment #1262] --> B[PR #1264 lands by squash]
B --> C[Governed archive wrapper]
C --> D[Archive packet under 2026-10-08]
C --> E[Promote rationale to doc-health canon]
E --> F[Retire modified-block-currency finding]
D --> G[README and task-list provenance updated]
File-Level Changes
Possibly linked issues
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
…l request in the README --moved-by needs a real pull-request number, and this branch had none until #1269 was opened, so the row is seeded here rather than in the archive act, in the order be6d4a6 used for the previous archive. Seeded by the machine, not by hand: python3 scripts/validate-sequenced-after.py . --seed-ledger --moved-by '#1269' -> wrote tests/sequenced_after/corpus-ledger.yaml (234 rows, 1 moved by #1269). python3 scripts/validate-sequenced-after.py . --ledger-diff -> per-change sweep ledger consistent with the corpus (234 rows). The diff is one line: amend-worker-input-budget-dispatch-wording's row goes from state active to archived, moved_by "#1264" -> "#1269", and moved_on 2026-10-07 -> 2026-10-08. No other row moved. README: the archived bullet's ARCHIVE-PR-NUMBER-PENDING marker (two occurrences, one line) now names PR #1269. Refs #1262 Lane: openxfactory-1 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔵 Needs a closer look
The archived task record still claims completed tasks retain unchecked boxes, contradicting the newly checked entries.
0 open findings
What changed in this PR
Archives the ratified worker-input-budget wording amendment and promotes its corrected rationale into the canonical doc-health specification.
Changes:
- Promotes the clarified over-budget dispatch wording.
- Archives the OpenSpec packet and updates its records.
- Retires associated ledger and self-gate entries.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
README.md |
Moves the packet from active to archived records. |
openspec/specs/doc-health/spec.md |
Promotes the corrected rationale. |
openspec/changes/archive/.../.openspec.yaml |
Preserves origin and approval metadata. |
openspec/changes/archive/.../proposal.md |
Archives the ratified proposal. |
openspec/changes/archive/.../tasks.md |
Records completed archive tasks. |
openspec/changes/archive/.../specs/doc-health/spec.md |
Preserves the promoted delta. |
openspec/changes/archive/.../review/ratification-2026-10-07.md |
Preserves the ratification record. |
tests/doc-health/test_modified_block_currency_self_gate.py |
Retires the promoted block’s ledger subject. |
tests/sequenced_after/corpus-ledger.yaml |
Marks the change archived with updated provenance. |
🧠 Review effort: Balanced
Give feedback about Copilot approvals in this survey to enter a drawing for a $150 gift card.
….5 and 4.1 are ticked Copilot's review 5459760638 at dcce80b noted that the archived task record still said 3.5 and 4.1 keep a literal open box, beside the two boxes the tick commit 658026b had just ticked. The note now says they kept it until their acts and were ticked on 2026-10-08, right before the archive act. Non-normative: no requirement or scenario text moves, and the archive commit 39fac48 stays the archive directory's adding commit. Refs #1262 Lane: openxfactory-1 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
Author
|
Lane: openxfactory-1 Copilot's review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟢 Approval recommended
The archive records, canonical wording, and supporting ledgers are consistent with the ratified amendment.
0 open findings
🧠 Review effort: Balanced
Give feedback about Copilot approvals in this survey to enter a drawing for a $150 gift card.
|
Contributor
Author
|
Lane: openxfactory-1 LANDING — lane openxfactory-1, session eb835de4-d46e-4bb7-86f3-82780be6f51e@Eagle, 2026-10-08T17:11:56Z, PR #1269 into opensoft/openxFactory main (Rule 6 window; rule6 scan CLEAR; gate PASS at head 918c6fb on main a936e53). On Brett Heap's word verbatim: "archive it after it lands". |
brettheap
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 8, 2026 17:12
|
Sorry @brettheap, you've used your own review budget of 250,000 diff characters for the last 7 days. You can request another review in 1 day and 3 hours by commenting |
Contributor
Author
brettheap
deleted the
archive/amend-worker-input-budget-dispatch-wording
branch
October 8, 2026 17:37
brettheap
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2026
…r-input-budget-dispatch-wording archive Lane: openxfactory-4 main moved through the archive of amend-worker-input-budget-dispatch-wording (#1269), which touches README.md, the doc-health spec and the sweep ledger and not this change's directory. Section 4 names the new base and the commits since fc4fa0f; section 6 carries the re-measured numbers (pinned gate 113 passed of 114 items, doc-health 19 info, corpus directories 310 subtests). The doc-health report is again byte-identical to main alone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
brettheap
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2026
…entity bound by layer, the single-writer rows and the holder's batch-3 flags (plan 038) (#1263) Lane: openxfactory-4 (openXfactory-4-openDox_extraction) ## T002c: plan 038's third bookkeeping batch (plan 038) Bookkeeping: no `Arc:` line, and no `openspec/changes/` path. It encodes rulings already posted on #656 and landings already merged, each cited by comment id or merge commit, with no new decision. It follows #1251 and #1257 in form, and redoes nothing either did. #1257 landed as `c70bdbd9`, so this PR is not stacked; `origin/main` (`c9dfd4f8`) is merged into the branch, never rebased. **Realizes / Falsifier:** none (bookkeeping). The gates are listed under "Gates" below. ### What changed (specs/038-opendox-document-tool-self-maintenance/) **Ticks, each merge commit read through GraphQL (`pullRequest{mergeCommit{oid}}`) before it was written.** The sweep covered every PR merged since 2026-10-06T23:30Z in openDox-code, openXdox-code, openDox, openXdox, openDox-spec and openxFactory, re-run at 2026-10-08T16:16Z: - openXdox-code: T095 #46 → `e2340bb6`, T101 #48 → `8b0401a1`, T098 #51 → `fc1115d6`, T103 #49 → `6f259156`, T096 #53 → `34e1c1f2`, T100 #54 → `2a3d8c09`, T099 #47 → `4aa3070a`, T102 #52 → `e7815ac5`, T097 #50 → `4dab93fc`, T022 #41 → `aefd1091`. - openDox-code: T104 #94 → `d616da3e`, T072 #95 → `99220883` (the arc's first realization). - Follow-ons recorded on the task they follow: T021's openXdox-code#55 → `da736090`, and T096's openXdox-code#56 → `9720925e`. - T095's Landed line also records Copilot r4201411760 as the holder's READY note did (`6027382308`, accepted limit under `5988818366`; the fix rides T073). - Nothing is ticked whose PR has not merged. T029 and T073 (openXdox-code#44, #45) and T012/T013 (openDox-code#90) stay open. **New task T105** (R2-INV-P5, read-only, lane 3; holder `6027341795`, claimed `6027346843`): ticked on lane 3's DONE line (2026-10-07T00:28:59Z), its summary `6028122920`, the map `lane-coord-034/r2/R2-INV-P5.md`, and the holder's ruling `6028138991`. Verdicts: T041, T042 and T043 READY-WITH-NOTES; T045, T047, T048 and T049 blocked by plan order only. Placed under "Wave 1's readiness" before W1, with a row in the Phase 5 slice table. The task count is 91 and plan.md's two stale "79 tasks" cites now read 91 tasks and T001 to T105 (`6028364555` item 5). **The four slice notes** (`6028138991`; no requirement or falsifier changes), as implementation notes on T042, T043, T045 and T047, refined by the holder's batch-3 flags (`6028364555`) and the Copilot-thread ruling (`6064169640`): - T042: the token `RESET_CONFIRMATION` stays byte-identical, its wording may change; Files gain `docs/runtime.md` (R2-INV-P5 § T042: its two table arrays move with `identity.TABLES`, which `test_deploy_shape.py` holds); `RULED_TABLES` is encoded as the map words it. - T042's SQL column is `full_run` (`6064169640`, fix-now, resolving Copilot 4205521074): the words "quote it or" are gone from T042, and `data-model.md` gains one line saying the SQL column is `full_run` because PostgreSQL 16 reserves `full`. **Files and falsifiers:** - T073: Files gain `tests/test_host_plane.py` and the `opendox-snapshot-*` farm exclusion scoped to the `opendox_spec` owner; the falsifier gains the farm case (Copilot r4201411760, accepted at #46's landing, `6027382308`, reply 4201421102). plan.md's conftest and `test_host_plane.py` rows, and the T020, T026 and T095 Files chains, end with T073. - T015 and T016: Files gain `tests/test_capability_honesty.py` and `tests/test_lens_seed_actions.py` (`6027633398`), with the same-kind enumeration collateral pre-authorized in the minimal way and listed in each PR body, and `tests/test_default_profile.py` (`6023619783` item 1, corrected by `6026622117` item 2), with the chain T015 → T016. plan.md gains two single-writer rows. - T041, T046, T057: the `identity` bound is split by layer (`6027706377` item 1, refining `6018624750`). T041 narrows to the module's own serialized finding shape; T046 gains it on `health list --json`; T057 gains it on the HTTP Health response; FR-011's coverage row cites all three. - T022's falsifier gains the root-`.gitignore` source check (`6026275158` item 2); T102's gains the widened no-bypass scan (`6026275158` item 3); `6028364555` item 4. - T012's Ruled line: `6026275158` item 1 and `6026622117` item 1. - T072's Files name openDox-code#95, and T071's entry names its ratification record, openxFactory#1261 (a DRAFT PR that exists now). T015's PR does not exist yet, so its number is not named. **Qualifiers and counts:** "plan 034's" on spec.md (two places) and clarify-questions.md (one place), found by content, nothing else moved (`6027706377` item 2). tasks.md's header and plan.md each carry a revision paragraph. ### Ruled and Decisions Ruled (all on #656): `6027341795`, `6027346843`, `6027382308`, `6027633398`, `6027706377`, `6026275158`, `6026622117`, `6023619783`, `6028122920`, `6028138991`, `6028364555`, `6064169640`. Decisions: none new. ### Readings, disclosed - T042's Files wording follows R2-INV-P5 § T042 (the `docs/runtime.md` arrays move with `identity.TABLES`); the holder's `6028364555` item 2 words the cause as the `full` rename, and cites the same map section. - plan.md's `tests/test_default_profile.py` row says the chain "follows `default_profile.py`'s", as `6023619783` words it; T046 and T057 are not given the file in their own Files lines. - `6023619783` item 2 (T071's record header) is not in this batch's items and is not encoded here. - Lane 3's other R2-INV-P5 observations (moved #1144 line references, floor and census counts, T015's census line) stay informational and are not encoded (`6028364555` item 7). ### Gates - `python3 scripts/validate-openspec-cli-pin.py --all --strict` at the merged head `b236fa6c`: exit 0 (the one accepted exception is `add-chain-attestation`'s disposition, as on main). - doc-health (`scripts/doc-health.py --single-repo .`) at `b236fa6c` against `origin/main` `c9dfd4f8`, same clone: identical reports, 31 critical, 26 error, 69 warning, 19 info, zero differences after SHA normalization. - Local `python -m pytest tests/ -q -m "not postgres" -n 8` at `3e6feb6b`: 9206 passed, 7 skipped, 1 failed. The failure is `tests/hermes_runtime_contracts/test_validator_cli.py::test_release_mode_field_is_preserved_on_the_real_repository[--require-realization-realization]`, a 30 s subprocess timeout that fails identically on `origin/main` in the same clone. Later commits change only spec text and chain records. - CI at the head `b236fa6c`: every check SUCCESS (rollup SUCCESS, read through GraphQL), including `pytest-suite`, `doc-health-py314`, `openspec-cli-pin` and SonarCloud. The head adds only the merge of `origin/main` `c9dfd4f8` (the archive of amend-worker-input-budget-dispatch-wording, #1269) to `c675894d`, whose rollup was SUCCESS too. - Copilot: at `a9fc7e7b` two threads (4205521074 → fixed in `4263d665` on `6064169640`; 4205521173 → fixed in `c3409c03`). At `3e6feb6b` two threads (4221525148, the PR description, updated; 4221525277, the T020, T026 and T095 chains, fixed in `c675894d`). At `c675894d` and at the head `b236fa6c`: "Approval recommended", 0 open findings. All four threads are answered and resolved. ### NOT done No requirement text, no contract file and no `openspec/changes/` path is touched. No box is ticked in #1144. refs #656 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Lane: openxfactory-4 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
brettheap
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2026
…23375303) (#1261) Lane: openxfactory-4 (openXfactory-4-openDox_extraction) Refs #656 (stays OPEN). **THE RATIFICATION RECORD for `realize-doc-health-direction-arc`** (plan 038's T071), the doc_health direction arc's own change. It landed as a draft through #1247 → `51456835` and #1253 → `fc4fa0ff`. No requirement, decision or task text moves: the change has no spec delta (`skip_specs: true`). It lands through the holder's lander in a Rule 6 window; this actor merges nothing. ## The word RULED by Brett Heap, 2026-10-06 at about 18:59Z, by interactive multi-choice, verbatim *"Ratify it (Recommended)"*, recorded at #656 comment [`6023375303`](#656 (comment)) (created 2026-10-06T19:00:45Z). The option text he saw read *"I post your word on #656 and land the ratification record (Status: ratified, Ratified by) under a Rule 6 window. T072 can start right away; T074 and T075 then follow in order."* ## The form followed `cd494e4c` / #1151, "Ratify add-neutral-product-standalone-operability on Brett Heap's word (#656 5815412869)", file for file and field for field. The holder's ruling at #656 [`6023619783`](#656 (comment)) confirms the one choice that differs from the change's as-filed text (below). ## What is ratified, and what the word authorizes - **Ratified:** the change as landed on `main` at `fc4fa0ff` (#1253, merged 2026-10-06T18:56:42Z). Its change-directory tree, `02d362f6ebcaf49e18aa107f7ce2b3a409ca2275`, is identical at #1253's final head `e4f3f1db` and on current `main`, and the last commit on `main` that touches it is `fc4fa0ff`. Copilot's review at `e4f3f1db` read "Approval recommended", Findings: None. - **D1–D7 stand as recommended.** `tasks.md` 1.2 provides that the word rules `design.md` § 11's D1–D7 as recommended unless it says otherwise, and the word does not. The record says that this applies 1.2's own rule and does not claim Brett Heap was shown the seven one by one. - **Authorized:** per the ruling record, the realization in plan 038's order: T072 (opportunistic, ARC-6), then T074 and T075. None of it happens by the word itself. - **Nothing archives or promotes.** The change stays ACTIVE until its realization is merged and green, and it gates neither release 2's close nor #1144's archive (ARC-Q3 (a)). ## What this PR changes Six files. None of the changes is requirement or scenario text. **`openspec/changes/realize-doc-health-direction-arc/proposal.md`** - `Status: ratified`, with a `Ratified:` citation. - A qualifier above the filing's "DRAFT. FILING IS NOT RATIFYING" paragraph, which is kept verbatim as the filing's record. - A `## Ratification record` section. - A read-at-ratification note after the D1–D7 list. **`design.md` and `tasks.md`** - `Status: ratified`, with a `Ratified by:` citation. This is the citation split #1144's record carried. - `design.md` § 11: the same read-at-ratification note. - `tasks.md` 1.1 (the filing, citing #1247 → `51456835` and #1253 → `fc4fa0ff`) and 1.2 (this act) are ticked. Boxes go from 0 `[x]` / 23 `[ ]` to **2 `[x]` / 21 `[ ]`**. - 1.2 keeps its as-filed wording and gains a marked italic note on the one divergence (below), as #1151 did for its own 1.8. **`.openspec.yaml`** - `approved_by` / `approved_on` are ADDED after `proposed_on`. `kind`, `id`, `path`, `reason`, `proposed_by` and `proposed_on` do not move. **New record:** `review/ratification-2026-10-06.md` (`Status: ratified`, `Kind: report`, one `Ratified:` citation). **`README.md`:** the *Active changes* entry's status, now linking the record. The sequenced-after ledger row does not move. **The one divergence from the text as filed.** `tasks.md` 1.2 says the record carries `Status: record`. It carries `Status: ratified` with a `Ratified:` citation, as #1144's record did. `document-lifecycle` sanctions both spellings, the option put to Brett read "(Status: ratified, Ratified by)", and a `Status: record` file trips `record-immutability` (CRITICAL) on any later edit, such as a Copilot fix commit on this PR. Confirmed by the holder at #656 `6023619783`. ## Gate state at `f9f71063` The tree is `main` at `40d6e5c1` plus this PR's twelve commits (the change itself, five merges of `main` and six re-measurements of the record), with the submodules initialised. After the first head, `main` moved five times: the archive of `add-worker-input-budget` (#1258), then #1266 and #1264, then the archive of `amend-worker-input-budget-dispatch-wording` (#1269), then #1263, #1270, #1271 and #1267 (renew-resolved-council-protocol), then #1272, #1275 (the archive of `correct-naming-families-count`) and #1277 (a bot review-lane repin). They touch `README.md`, `docs/`, the sweep ledger, other changes, the review-lane contracts and workflows and the doc-health and project-repo-schema specs, and not the change directory (its tree is still `02d362f6ebcaf49e18aa107f7ce2b3a409ca2275` on `main`, last commit `fc4fa0ff`). So `main` was merged in, never rebased, and everything below was re-measured. `main` has since moved again, to `b4b9d903` (a new change, `refresh-install-repository-enumerations-opsxfactory-gateway`: its own directory, a README entry and a ledger row). It is not merged here, per the holder's one-merge instruction, and a trial merge with it is clean. ``` OPENSPEC_TELEMETRY=0 openspec validate realize-doc-health-direction-arc --strict → valid (the pinned 1.12.0) validate-openspec-cli-pin.py --all --strict → exit 0, 0 UNDISPOSITIONED failures 113 passed, 1 failed (114 items); the 1 = the accepted exception, as on main alone validate-code-surface.py . / validate-target-release.py . → passed validate-sequenced-after.py . / --ledger-diff → pass; ledger consistent (235 rows), this row unmoved proposal-support.py . verify realize-doc-health-direction-arc → ok doc-health.py --single-repo . → 31 critical, 26 error, 69 warning, 19 info report byte-identical to main alone (same clone kind); 0 findings name this change doc-health families (1.2's falsifier) → proposal-origin 0 findings, status-validity 0 findings (negative control: dropping proposal.md's Ratified: line takes ratified-provenance 27 → 28 critical, naming proposal.md) pytest -m "not postgres" -k "ledger or records or sequenced or openspec" → 615 passed, 3 skipped pytest sequenced_after code_surface target_release proposal-support scope_globs packet_reference → 866 passed, 311 subtests passed pytest tests/doc-health → 2157 passed ``` An earlier `tests/doc-health` run showed 8 failures in `test_neutrality_dispatch.py`. They were this actor's own environment, not the tree: an exported `REPO` variable collided with the fake scout worker's `REPO`. With it unset the file gives 25 passed, and the whole directory is green above. ## Copilot - **First head `0039a47e`:** review `5436306140`, "Approval recommended", Findings: None, 0 threads. - **Head `739da6e0`** (after the first merge of `main`): review `5440756736`, "Approval recommended", Findings: None, 0 threads. - **Head `69479c77`** (after the second merge of `main`): review `5459920482`, "Approval recommended", 0 threads. - **Head `83e3511e`** (after the third merge of `main`): review `5460937374`, "Approval recommended", 0 open findings, 0 threads. - **Head `b186eb62`** (after the fourth merge of `main`): review `5462168108`, "Needs a closer look", **0 open findings**, 0 threads. Its stated reason is that final approval depends on human validation of the governance authority and the historical provenance assertions. The holder ruled at #656 [`6069024568`](#656 (comment)), item 5, that this is NOT a block, because that authority is Brett Heap's ratify word `6023375303`. - **Checks at `b186eb62`:** the rollup was SUCCESS with 15 status checks, all SUCCESS, including `merge-master-approval`, `pytest-suite` and SonarCloud Code Analysis. 0 threads unresolved. - **Head `f89fc853`** (after the fifth merge of `main`): review `5464071466`, "Needs a closer look", **0 open findings**, 0 threads. Its stated reason is that the exact-head checks and the Codex review were then pending, and that final approval also depends on governance provenance, which the holder's ruling at #656 `6069024568`, item 5, covers. - **Final head `f9f71063`** (a record-only correction of the corpus subtest figure, 312 to 311, which the completed run measured): Copilot requested through the reviewer API after the push. Its result, the checks and the thread count are recorded here once the exact final head has been reviewed. ## Codex - At `b186eb62`, `@codex review` was posted twice (comments `6067925769` and `6069046343`), and the `chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]` answered both with the usage-limit message (comments `6067927988` and `6069048581`). No Codex review existed at that head. - At `f89fc853`, `@codex review` (comment `6071059884`) was answered with a review: **Reviewed commit `f89fc853cb`**, "Didn't find any major issues" (comment `6071083487`; summary comment `6071062721`, Code Review completed at 2026-10-08T23:29:24Z). - At the final head `f9f71063`, `@codex review` was posted once after the push (comment `6071252263`). The bot's reply is recorded here once it arrives. READY needs a Codex "Reviewed commit" at the exact head, or Brett Heap's explicit waiver (#656 `6069024568`, item 4). ## What is NOT done - No code, pin, gitlink, contract bundle or release tag moves. T072, T074 and T075 are the realization, and none of them starts by this PR. - Plan 038's `specs/038-…/tasks.md` is not edited here. T071's tick there goes in the holder's own bookkeeping batch. - Nothing archives or promotes. **Rule 6:** this PR touches `openspec/changes/` and the README OpenSpec Records block, so it lands in a declared window by the holder, and not by this actor. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Lane: openxfactory-4 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Lane: openxfactory-1
What this is
This archives
amend-worker-input-budget-dispatch-wording, the #1262 amendment. Brett Heap gave the archive word in session to laneopenxfactory-1, verbatim "archive it after it lands" (2026-10-07). It is RULED inopensoft/brett-wiplanes/log/openxfactory-1.mdat 2026-10-07T11:04:36Z, commitcd962505. Refs #1262.a936e5310400c3340096709a5127cde908180748.mainata936e5310400c3340096709a5127cde908180748. It carries none of Propose and ratify amend-worker-input-budget-dispatch-wording on Brett Heap's word 'ratify 1262 when ready' #1264's pre-squash commits.This pull request lands as a MERGE COMMIT, never a squash, inside a Rule 6 landing window, because it touches
openspec/changes/. The archive directory is named for the UTC day of the archive act, 2026-10-08.archive-date-vs-commitcompares that name with the UTC committer date of the commit that first added the directory. A merge commit keeps that commit; a squash would replace it with one dated at landing.code_surface: none, so underrelease-realizationthe packet archives on landing plus its own task list. No realization evidence is owed:#1137→9da52e31already never dispatches a unit it measured over the budget (the packet'stasks.md1.1).The archive act
It went through the governed wrapper, never a bare
openspec archive:The wrapper exited 0. It reported:
The promotion
The block was taken from the archived delta and from canon by its heading, and hashed.
3533488d999d93d5…83326fa0f49f6e7c…--numstatreads +5 -2.The commits
tasks.md3.5 and 4.1, on the recording for the archive act, so the wrapper finds no open box (precedente37ab6bd).doc-healthtakes the delta._LEDGER_SUBJECTSrow for this block retires on its own stated condition, leaving 13 literal entries, 12 unique.validate-sequenced-after.py . --seed-ledger --moved-by '#1269'flips this change's row toarchived, dated 2026-10-08. The README bullet's PR marker now names Archive amend-worker-input-budget-dispatch-wording: promote the reworded rationale sentence onto doc-health #1269.5459760638atdcce80b8raised no inline finding, but its overview noted the archivedtasks.mdstill said 3.5 and 4.1 keep an open box.918c6fbdputs that note in the past tense. Non-normative; the archive commit39fac485(committed 2026-10-08T16:18:45Z) stays the archive directory's adding commit, andarchive-date-vs-commitpasses.Review
5459760638atdcce80b8: no inline finding; the overview note above, taken in918c6fbd.5459832399at918c6fbd, this head: approval recommended, 0 findings.Gates at this head
Each gate was run locally in a fresh full clone named
openxFactoryat this head,918c6fbd, andmaina936e531was measured the same way in a second clone of the same kind.mainexitcli-pin-all-strictproposal-support-verifycode-surfacetarget-releasescope-globssequenced-aftersequenced-after-ledger-diffformer-id-arrivalrelease-tag-gatedoc-healthdoc-health: 1 finding line(s) leave and 0 arrive against
main.pytest, the gate-module subset (
tests/doc-health,sequenced_after,review_lane_pin,proposal-support,code_surface,target_release,packet_reference,citation_remainder,scope_globs,former_id_arrival,openspec_cli_pin): at this head 8 failed and 3580 passed, the SAME 8 ids asmain(3580 passed there too).pytest, the whole suite (
--continue-on-collection-errors), atdcce80b8, which differs from this head only by the past-tense note: 238 failing or erroring ids, the SAME 238 asmain. Both local clones lack theopenDoxandopenXdoxlegs, which CI sets up; CI'spytest-suitepasses at this head.What this archive does not decide
add-worker-input-budgetis not edited. It is the record of what was ratified on 2026-10-06.tasks.md§ 5 registered them.🤖 Generated with Claude Code