Skip to content

OCPNODE-4521: Promote AdditionalStorageConfig feature gate to Default - #2858

Open
saschagrunert wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
saschagrunert:ocpnode-4521-promote-additional-storage-config-default
Open

OCPNODE-4521: Promote AdditionalStorageConfig feature gate to Default#2858
saschagrunert wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
saschagrunert:ocpnode-4521-promote-additional-storage-config-default

Conversation

@saschagrunert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Promote the AdditionalStorageConfig feature gate from
TechPreviewNoUpgrade/DevPreviewNoUpgrade to the Default feature set,
making additional layer stores, image stores, and artifact stores
generally available in OpenShift 5.0.

cc @haircommander @QiWang19 @sairameshv @harche @bitoku @yuqi-zhang

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label May 26, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@saschagrunert: This pull request references OCPNODE-4521 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Promote the AdditionalStorageConfig feature gate from
TechPreviewNoUpgrade/DevPreviewNoUpgrade to the Default feature set,
making additional layer stores, image stores, and artifact stores
generally available in OpenShift 5.0.

cc @haircommander @QiWang19 @sairameshv @harche @bitoku @yuqi-zhang

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 26, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @saschagrunert! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note

Reviews paused

It looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the reviews.auto_review.auto_pause_after_reviewed_commits setting.

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:

  • ▶️ Resume reviews
  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates AdditionalStorageConfig so it is enabled in Default and OKD feature-gate configuration, adds the corresponding enablement in the Go feature-gate definition and defaults documentation, and moves the flag from disabled to enabled lists in four feature-gate manifests. It also removes the release.openshift.io/feature-set: CustomNoUpgrade annotation from the base ContainerRuntimeConfig CRD and deletes the feature-set-specific ContainerRuntimeConfig CRD manifests.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15
✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly states the main change: promoting AdditionalStorageConfig to the Default feature set.
Description check ✅ Passed The description matches the changeset and explains the promotion from preview to default and its purpose.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed Touched files are feature-gate YAML/defs only; no Ginkgo test titles were added or changed, and the Go file change is a static feature-gate enablement list.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed No Ginkgo or test files were changed; the PR only updates feature-gate/manifests, so this check is not applicable.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PASS: the PR only updates feature-gate/config manifests and docs; no new Ginkgo e2e tests or MicroShift-unsupported APIs were added.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed No Ginkgo e2e tests were added or modified; the diff only updates feature-gate configs/docs/manifests, so SNO test compatibility is not implicated.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed Only feature-gate metadata and CRD payloads changed; no deployment, controller, affinity, nodeSelector, or topology-aware scheduling logic was introduced.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed Changed Go files have no main/init/TestMain/RunSpecs blocks or stdout/logging calls; the PR only updates feature-gate and manifest data.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PASS: The PR only updates feature-gate manifests/docs and one feature registration file; no new Ginkgo e2e tests or network/IP assumptions were added.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed Touched files are feature-gate YAML/Go and CRD deletions; no weak-crypto, custom crypto, or secret-comparison patterns found.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed No changed manifest adds privileged/root, hostPID/Network/IPC, allowPrivilegeEscalation, or SYS_ADMIN; patch grep found none.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed Touched files only adjust feature-gate enablement/manifests; no runtime logging code or sensitive-data-bearing log statements were added.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 26, 2026
@saschagrunert
saschagrunert force-pushed the ocpnode-4521-promote-additional-storage-config-default branch from 4be619a to bc99e86 Compare May 26, 2026 09:07
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 26, 2026
@saschagrunert
saschagrunert marked this pull request as ready for review May 26, 2026 09:10
@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from JoelSpeed and yuqi-zhang May 26, 2026 09:11
@saschagrunert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

The verify-feature-promotion check fails because there are no FeatureGate:AdditionalStorageConfig tagged test runs in Sippy yet. The e2e tests are pending merge in openshift/origin#31083 (approved, CI mostly green). Once that PR merges and accumulates sufficient test history (at least 5 tests per core platform), this check will pass.

@saschagrunert
saschagrunert force-pushed the ocpnode-4521-promote-additional-storage-config-default branch from bc99e86 to a7b0036 Compare June 3, 2026 07:49
@saschagrunert saschagrunert changed the title WIP: OCPNODE-4521: Promote AdditionalStorageConfig feature gate to Default OCPNODE-4521: Promote AdditionalStorageConfig feature gate to Default Jun 3, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 3, 2026
@saschagrunert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/retest

@yuqi-zhang yuqi-zhang left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes themselves looks fine, pending the tests merging and generating signal.

I see the test PR is still WIP, anything holding that up?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 13, 2026
@saschagrunert
saschagrunert force-pushed the ocpnode-4521-promote-additional-storage-config-default branch from a7b0036 to 9544e48 Compare June 15, 2026 07:00
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 15, 2026
@everettraven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@saschagrunert This needs a rebase and tests that pass promotion verification to progress further. Feel free to ping me when that is done and this is ready for a review.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 24, 2026
@saschagrunert
saschagrunert force-pushed the ocpnode-4521-promote-additional-storage-config-default branch from 9544e48 to 38fa453 Compare June 25, 2026 13:33
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 25, 2026
@saschagrunert
saschagrunert force-pushed the ocpnode-4521-promote-additional-storage-config-default branch from 38fa453 to 6d37fdb Compare June 30, 2026 06:21
@saschagrunert
saschagrunert force-pushed the ocpnode-4521-promote-additional-storage-config-default branch from 6d37fdb to 44429db Compare July 9, 2026 12:18
@everettraven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The test appears to have stopped running. I see no new runs since the 30th even though the periodics have run that should contain them. Has something changed?

The test moved from the 2of2 to the 1of2 job shard.

openshift/origin#31439 (merged Jul 28) added [Skipped:SingleReplicaTopology] to the test name to skip it on SNO. This changed the SHA-256 hash used for deterministic sharding (pkg/test/ginkgo/sharder.go), which moved the test from shard 2of2 to 1of2.

The test is still running and passing in 1of2, confirmed in today's run.

The problem is that Sippy treats the renamed test as a new test, so all run counts reset to 1. The old test name still has stale data (18/19 runs on metal/dual) that will age out of the 2-week window.

Fix: openshift/origin#31486 reverts the [Skipped:SingleReplicaTopology] tag from the Describe string and uses a programmatic skip via IsSingleNode() instead. This restores the original test name and preserves existing Sippy data.

cc @BhargaviGudi

Thanks for the additional info here - I don't think we need to change the skipping approach just for the test name change. I had missed that this would be the case, but now that I'm aware of it I think we can just combine the test runs where it makes sense (obviously omitting SNO).

With that in mind, the most recent verification would pass had there not been a test rename, so I'm happy to approve this as-is.

@everettraven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

Overriding promotion verification due to test renaming causing a problem, but it is the same test and when counted together correctly, the test passes promotion criteria for this feature.

/override ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion

Known hypershift integration issue that is being fixed.

/override ci/prow/verify-hypershift-integration

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@everettraven: Overrode contexts on behalf of everettraven: ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion, ci/prow/verify-hypershift-integration

Details

In response to this:

/approve
/lgtm

Overriding promotion verification due to test renaming causing a problem, but it is the same test and when counted together correctly, the test passes promotion criteria for this feature.

/override ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion

Known hypershift integration issue that is being fixed.

/override ci/prow/verify-hypershift-integration

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 5, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduling tests matching the pipeline_run_if_changed or not excluded by pipeline_skip_if_only_changed parameters:
/test e2e-aws-ovn
/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance
/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-2of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-1of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-2of2
/test e2e-azure
/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-upgrade
/test e2e-upgrade-out-of-change
/test minor-e2e-upgrade-minor

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 5, 2026
@BhargaviGudi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

@saschagrunert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/verified by @BhargaviGudi

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Aug 6, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@saschagrunert: This PR has been marked as verified by @BhargaviGudi.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @BhargaviGudi

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD cfb6385 and 2 for PR HEAD 833c6e7 in total

@saschagrunert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

CI exclusion is in openshift/origin#31489

@saschagrunert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@saschagrunert: saschagrunert unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators, approvers in top level OWNERS file, and the following github teams:openshift: openshift-release-oversight openshift-staff-engineers openshift-sustaining-engineers.

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7f3965b and 1 for PR HEAD 833c6e7 in total

@asahay19

asahay19 commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/lgtm

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: asahay19, everettraven, yuqi-zhang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@JoelSpeed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance

@qodo-for-rh-openshift

qodo-for-rh-openshift Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR-Agent: could not find a component named e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance in a supported language in this PR.

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 72ae442 and 0 for PR HEAD 833c6e7 in total

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/hold

Revision 833c6e7 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 7, 2026
@saschagrunert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/unhold
/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 8, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 72ae442 and 2 for PR HEAD 833c6e7 in total

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@saschagrunert: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/verify-hypershift-integration 833c6e7 link true /test verify-hypershift-integration
ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion 833c6e7 link true /test verify-feature-promotion

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@saschagrunert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@JoelSpeed this would require a need override.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants