OCPNODE-4521: Promote AdditionalStorageConfig feature gate to Default - #2858
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: LGTM mode |
|
@saschagrunert: This pull request references OCPNODE-4521 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
Hello @saschagrunert! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api: |
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR updates AdditionalStorageConfig so it is enabled in Default and OKD feature-gate configuration, adds the corresponding enablement in the Go feature-gate definition and defaults documentation, and moves the flag from disabled to enabled lists in four feature-gate manifests. It also removes the 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
4be619a to
bc99e86
Compare
|
The |
bc99e86 to
a7b0036
Compare
|
/retest |
yuqi-zhang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes themselves looks fine, pending the tests merging and generating signal.
I see the test PR is still WIP, anything holding that up?
a7b0036 to
9544e48
Compare
|
@saschagrunert This needs a rebase and tests that pass promotion verification to progress further. Feel free to ping me when that is done and this is ready for a review. |
9544e48 to
38fa453
Compare
38fa453 to
6d37fdb
Compare
6d37fdb to
44429db
Compare
Thanks for the additional info here - I don't think we need to change the skipping approach just for the test name change. I had missed that this would be the case, but now that I'm aware of it I think we can just combine the test runs where it makes sense (obviously omitting SNO). With that in mind, the most recent verification would pass had there not been a test rename, so I'm happy to approve this as-is. |
|
/approve Overriding promotion verification due to test renaming causing a problem, but it is the same test and when counted together correctly, the test passes promotion criteria for this feature. /override ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion Known hypershift integration issue that is being fixed. /override ci/prow/verify-hypershift-integration |
|
@everettraven: Overrode contexts on behalf of everettraven: ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion, ci/prow/verify-hypershift-integration DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Scheduling tests matching the |
|
/retest-required |
|
/verified by @BhargaviGudi |
|
@saschagrunert: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
CI exclusion is in openshift/origin#31489 |
|
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance |
|
@saschagrunert: saschagrunert unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators, approvers in top level OWNERS file, and the following github teams:openshift: openshift-release-oversight openshift-staff-engineers openshift-sustaining-engineers. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: asahay19, everettraven, yuqi-zhang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance |
|
PR-Agent: could not find a component named |
|
/hold Revision 833c6e7 was retested 3 times: holding |
|
/unhold |
|
@saschagrunert: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@JoelSpeed this would require a need override. |
Promote the AdditionalStorageConfig feature gate from
TechPreviewNoUpgrade/DevPreviewNoUpgrade to the Default feature set,
making additional layer stores, image stores, and artifact stores
generally available in OpenShift 5.0.
cc @haircommander @QiWang19 @sairameshv @harche @bitoku @yuqi-zhang