Skip to content

[PM seat] domain:ui @ objectui — ⏳ vacant #5560

Open
Open
[PM seat] domain:ui @ objectui — ⏳ vacant#5560
Labels
pm:seat

Description

@os-sales
os-sales
opened on Aug 21, 2026

Seat registration post for the domain:ui lane — the objectui execution seat (maintainer ruling 2026-08-21, the three-way split of objectui cards into domain:devx / domain:spec / domain:ui).

Body is authoritative; title and assignee are derived views. Single writer: the sitting seat PM. Comments are audit only and never carry state — except that the read side takes body + comments newer than the body's last edit, so a comment posted after this edit is the current value until the next fold.

Versioned job description: objectstack:.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/ui.md (read this sitting at objectstack 5a871e4e; lane file touch 5e5ce48ce, SKILL.md touch c1f4093b, references touch 2667e240).

Body refreshed 2026-10-21T08:31Z at clock-out. ⏳ VACANT. The sitting of session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 (seated 2026-10-19T15:57Z) ends here on the maintainer's 「你可以下班了。」; its clock-out brief is the comment posted right after this edit. The previous body revision (held, refreshed 2026-10-20T00:49Z) and this sitting's delta comments are the archive of the sitting.

  • §0–§0b are carried forward unchanged (⛔ keep them in every rewrite).
  • ⛔ Re-derive before acting on anything inherited.
  • ⚠️ §0's label reading is stale. objectui#7233 is open with documentation, tracking and domain:ui, and has no pm:queue or pm:retriage. objectui#7089 returns 404.
  • ⚠️ §0a describes a protocol that has since moved. Read references/contract-review.md at source, not §0a:

0. ⛔⛔ HANDOVER POINTERS — carry this section into every rewrite of this post

objectui#7089 and objectui#7233 are the two written handovers for THIS seat. They are documents to read, ⛔ not work to dispatch.

⚠️ This section exists because the pointer was LOST. #7233's own body says it is "linked from the seat post #5560" — it was not: the link vanished across successive seat-post rewrites. #7233 warns about exactly this failure mode and then became its victim. ⇒ If you rewrite this body, this section survives.

Both carry pm:queue + priority:p1 deliberately. The seat hung pm:retriage on both (objectui#7233 comment 5615838671, objectui#7089 comment 5615843493). ⛔ Neither is closed. Still awaiting the triage seat — unchanged at R16.

0a. ⛔⛔⛔ needs:contract-review — READ THIS BEFORE WRITING ANY CLAIM

⚠️ An R10 "governance escalation" arguing this label is underdetermined in this lane was wrong and is withdrawn. Retraction with sources: objectui#8568 comment 5625952236.

The contract, re-read at source this round at 7aae005:

where what it says
objectstack/.claude/agents/os-dev.md a Clause-②: yes claim ⇒ the DEV hangs the label on both carriers with the draft PR, and reports the --pair exit code
SKILL.md 〈入队与落地〉 a Clause-②: yes claim hangs the card-side carrier in the same stroke — that half is the PM's
contract-review.md 复核归属 ownership is the dispatching seat's; for non-spec seats the clause-② review IS default-tier in-seat self-review plus the gates
contract-review.md 降档保险丝 ⭐ CORRECTED 2026-09-21. The FUSE (未达档 ⛔ 不自审) binds the spec and skills seats — the charter moved twice on this and now reads 「保险丝只管 spec 与 skills 席的条款②复核」. ⚠️ But the enqueue gate is wider and binds THIS lane: 「双肢命中任一 ⇒ 无达档条款②复核 PASS 在案 ⛔ 禁止入队」, and a Clause-②: yes declaration is one of the two limbs. ⇒ a clause-②-yes card from this seat needs an at-tier review before ready/enqueue, and this seat does not serve at that tier ⇒ an isolated at-tier subagent. Lived on objectui#10172: that subagent died on a tier quota (HTTP 429) before reviewing, and ⛔ the quota-exhaustion downgrade does not reach review — 「豁免对象是派发,复核 ⛔ 不随派发档位免除」. The PR waits outside the queue; that is the safe state, ⛔ not a failure
contract-review.md 清标即落地 PASS ⇒ the SEAT strips both carriers in one stroke, with a provenance comment citing the record id and the judged head

⭐ CORRECTED AT R16 — the charter moved on 2026-09-10T16:50Z and this rule changed. The previous body said "carriers stay hung when there is no PASS." The current text says 「FAIL 同 PASS 剥双载体」 — a FAIL also strips both carriers, leaving a handover comment on the card (citing the review, the independence pair, and what is owed) with card state and assignee unmoved.
⇒ the correct rule is: carriers hang only while NO review record exists. ⛔ Not "until PASS". The operational consequence for objectui#9078 is unchanged — it has no review of any kind — but the reason is narrower than the old wording.

⭐ ALSO NEW AT 7aae005 — the review record now has a REQUIRED SHAPE (同形). A conforming record carries: a ## Contract review heading · the reviewed head sha · items ①②③ (derived judgments / semver / boundary flags) · an independence pair · a PASS/FAIL verdict.

Implemented-by:  the dev's claude/issue-N branch   (a mode:subagent dev has no session of its own)
Reviewed-by:     the reviewing seat's session id

Same session on both lines ⇒ report SELF-REVIEW, ⛔ not an independent review. The four exemplary trails this post used to cite (objectui#9072/#8728 · #9075/#8632 · #9080/#9020 · #9093/#8729) all predate the 同形 requirement — ⛔ do not copy their shape, copy 5628635238.

⭐ Exercised once under the new shape and it landed clean: objectui#9090 / card objectui#9053. Review 5628635238, provenance 5628648763, --pair 9090 exit 0.
⭐ Hang additively: POST .../issues/N/labels adds; an issue_write update replaces the whole set.
⛔ Never tell a dev not to hang it. A standing contract outranks a PM's prose.
⚠️ check-clause2-carriers.mjs lives in objectstack, and it defaults to the objectstack board. ⇒ PM_SWEEP_REPO=objectstack-ai/objectui node scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs --pair N. Without it the script answers about the wrong repo and says so in a line easy to skim past. ⚠️ PAIR-EXIT=$? after a pipe captures the pipe's exit code, not the script's — redirect to a file, then read it.
⚠️ Disclosed by the predecessor and still owed: pre-landing check ② was not satisfied on that session's earlier clause-② landings, because the label was never hung. Nothing landed that the in-seat review had not passed. Whether to backfill is the maintainer's.
⛔ Do NOT clear it on objectui#8568 — provenance predates that session; it belongs to the maintainer or the director seat.

0b. ⛔⛔ HOW TO READ THE QUEUE

① THE CARD BODY'S FRAMING OF ITS DISPOSITION IS NOT ITS STATE. Measured SIX times.

Rulings land as comments; the body is never rewritten. #8568 · #8496 · #8778 · #8770 · #8958 · and at R16 #9053, whose stated blocker was discharged by a triage comment the body cannot know about.

② A TRUNCATED ENUMERATION READS LIKE A SHORT QUEUE.

list_issues on TWO labels returns the UNION and truncates silently. ⭐ Fix: single label, fields omitting body, perPage:100, then intersect locally. ⭐ Always cross-check against totalCount. ⚠️ list_pull_requests blows the context budget outright.

③ ⚠️ Do not over-correct. Verified genuinely unruled: #8824, #8817, #8885 Part 2, #8826 Q1/Q2, #8509.

④ ⭐⭐⭐ A TRIAGE RULING IS NOT SELF-SUFFICIENT — AND NEITHER IS ITS MEASUREMENT.

⑤ WRITE THE CLAIM COMMENT BEFORE LAUNCHING THE AGENT.

Claim: line plus a bare Clause-②: yes|no. Only bare yes/no parse; without it check-clause2-carriers reads exit 4.
⚠️ The declaration must survive a route the dev has not chosen yet. ⛔ Declaring no and revising on delivery is not available. ⇒ 「拿不准 ⇒ 按 yes」, and say in the claim why, so the in-seat review is not re-deriving the reason.

⑥ ⭐ TWO SEATS CAN GRADE THE SAME OPTION DIFFERENTLY — NOT THIS SEAT'S TO BREAK.

objectui#8631: triage says work-lane; a peer PM seat says ruling-versus-ruling and above the execution seat. Triage's "neutral unavailable affordance" IS the peer seat's option B, and the objection to B is not safety but that its copy "silently collapses two cards into one sentence". ⇒ ⛔ NOT dispatched; conflict at 5626536182, needs one maintainer sentence.

⑦ ⭐⭐⭐ §0b① APPLIES TO THIS SEAT'S OWN PRs, AND IT COST A DUPLICATE.

A PR body is frozen at PR-open time. When the seat's instruction is later withdrawn, the dev's faithful transcription of it stays in the body and reads like current state. On objectui#9075 that produced a duplicate PASS and a false claim about a dev who had done everything right (corrected at 5627159432).
⇒ ⛔ Before acting on any PR, read this post and the PR's COMMENTS first. The body is the oldest artefact on the page, not the newest.

1. 当前 PM
status ⏳ vacant since 2026-10-21T08:31Z · last sitter huangyiirene · session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 (seated 2026-10-19T15:57Z)
stay-behind none: nothing of this seat is in flight, in review or in the merge queue
last posture (⛔ not inherited) concurrency 1 (「并发1」) and priority:p3 cards only (「当前任务处理完，后续只派 p3 的卡」). These were said to that session; a successor starts from the protocol default unless the maintainer restates them
seat Routine trig_01GXw4Cq8f3SaB5aEUb7oDkG (self-bound, 17 * * * *) is deleted at this clock-out
earlier sitters' Routines trig_015jTgLscLAc6CjWoeA9Jsed ("ui seat 1 PM fire", 44 * * * *) fires into cse_013r2cLzuhBQfmLZv7Cxh9nt (not this account's; not listable here). trig_01E7zgXzMxus7w3SBh6hbKjR is bound to session_011K9g23W67dy2zwnyzaoB6o. If either fires, its mutex read meets this vacancy and may sit.
sibling seats domain:ui#2 (baozhoutao, objectui#9771) · domain:ui#3 (objectui#9800) · domain:ui#4 (objectui#10243) · domain:ui#5 (objectui#10488) · objectui domain:devx seat 1 (os-warren, objectui#5748)
successor /pm-dispatch 接手, then read this body and the comments newer than its last edit

2. 接任台账 (domain:ui lane, objectui) — read at clock-out, 2026-10-21T08:31Z

3. 热文件串行队

  • None held by this seat.
  • .objectstack-sha is at 06cab4849a8a (objectstack 18.0.0). The next pin bump is the unlock reading for any pm:blocked card whose Blocked-by: names an objectstack commit.

4. 说明 (cross-lane notes)

  • Setup since objectui 749ed760: a fresh checkout or worktree runs pnpm run setup once (about 3 minutes). A bare pnpm install fails. CI restores the pinned build from a cache keyed by the pin.
  • A pin bump is a full contract follow, and CI is its measurement. Run the 16-shard matrix in CI, not locally. Locally, run the targeted suites of the files you change.
  • New keys a bump surfaces are booked to owner cards, not declared in the bump (objectui#11111 decision 3 = B). The Clause-②: line of a bump that widens by reference and narrows reads yes (narrowing) (clause2-line.mjs).
  • objectstack's Console Pin Gate runs only on main push, schedule and dispatch, never on pull_request or merge_group.
  • objectstack-ai/cloud is unreadable from this lane's sessions (REST 403).
  • Write path: the fleet-write relay, run from an objectstack checkout: post-stamped.mjs, label-write.mjs, issue-create.mjs, fleet-write/dispatch.mjs.
  • Read side: this body, plus the comments newer than its last edit.

Activity

  1. os-sales
    added
    pm:seat
    on Aug 21, 2026

  2. os-sales commented on Aug 21, 2026

    @os-sales
    os-sales
    on Aug 21, 2026 – with Claude
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Audit probe — angle-bracket survival through this write path

    Not lane state. Posted to measure, precisely, which angle-bracket forms survive a body written through the GitHub MCP tools, because the seat post currently asserts a mechanism ("the GitHub body sanitizer strips angle-bracket-delimited content") that a counter-observation contradicts: dependabot's PR bodies (#4945, #4958) carry hundreds of literal HTML tags intact. If those survive and mine do not, the variable is the write path, not GitHub. This comment will be read back and the result recorded; it can be deleted afterwards.

    Five forms, each on its own line, each labelled so a missing one is identifiable by its label alone:

    • A · HTML comment:
    • B · JSX tag in prose:
    • C · TS generic in prose: Array<{ a: string }>
    • D · bare comparison in prose: a < b and c > d
    • E · pre-escaped entity: <div>

    Fenced block, same five:

    A <!-- os-dev-report -->
B <div className="x">
C Array<{ a: string }>
D a < b and c > d
E &lt;div&gt;

    Inline code spans: A <!-- os-dev-report --> · B <div className="x"> · C Array<{ a: string }> · D a < b > c

    Control (must survive, proves the comment itself landed): ZZCONTROL-SENTINEL-5560.

    Generated by Claude Code

  3. os-sales commented on Aug 21, 2026

    @os-sales
    os-sales
    on Aug 21, 2026 – with Claude
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Audit note — round 7, cross-repo finding raised for the maintainer's attention. Seat post body is authoritative; this comment records one item ahead of the round-close rewrite because it names a production-affecting shape in the other repo, outside this seat's lane.

    objectstack-ai/objectstack#10928, filed by the #4765 dev while measuring the installed spec. Unassigned and unlabelled — deliberately, because it is an objectstack card and neither the labelling nor the grading is this seat's to do.

    The shape: UniqueScopeSchema's rejection message calls 'organization' "the explicit spelling of true" on both surfaces. Measured against installed GA 17.0.0, that is false on one of them — on a declared index, bare true is the positional spelling of 'global', not 'organization'. The helper readout is unambiguous:

    value isUniqueDeclared isGlobalUnique isOrganizationUnique
    true true false false
    'global' true true false
    'organization' true false true

    Bare true sets neither scope flag, so no organization key part is prepended — which is precisely what makes it 'global' on that surface.

    Why it is worth the maintainer's eye rather than the queue's. An author refused on that key is told by the error message itself to write 'organization'. Doing so silently changes materialization — the driver prepends the NULL-safe organization key part — on an index that may already exist on deployed databases. That is the unannounced reinterpretation the #8323 ruling and the #5082 sequencing exist to prevent, arriving through the error text rather than through a schema change.

    Duplicate-searched before filing (two searches, objectstack repo). Nearest prior art is #8463 / PR #8512, which corrected the same field-vs-index divergence on a different artifact — isOrganizationScopedUnique's JSDoc in driver-sql — not on the shared error map.

    Relevance to this lane, and why it changed a fix here. The same divergence is why #5614 does not uniformly rewrite unique: true: at field level bare true is not deprecated at all ("stays valid indefinitely … no trap" per the spec's own prose), so harmonizing both occurrences would have shipped a fresh piece of false guidance on a card whose entire purpose is stopping exactly that. The dev caught this by measuring rather than by following the card, and the card is better for it.

    Generated by Claude Code

  4. os-zhuang commented on Aug 22, 2026

    @os-zhuang
    os-zhuang
    on Aug 22, 2026 – with Claude
    Contributor

    Audit — seat takeover, 2026-08-22 ~19:50Z. Body rewritten and compacted; this comment is the audit trail and carries no state.

    In: session_01EuPCi56cnGyykygi3z9w4m. Out: session_012u2pRjcqAYtoEjgr3wwhnK, dark since its 11:52Z body write.

    Mutex before the first write, so the next reader can re-check rather than trust it: last shift briefing in the body = 11:52Z (~8 h, many rounds stale); newest open-round marker = the same 11:52Z line; no Claim: comment from another session on any pm:dispatched card in this lane. All three clear.

    The takeover's substantive finding: round 16 did not fail — it completed 5/5 and nothing recorded it. The dark session's body still reads "5 cards in flight". Reconstructed from GitHub: #5202/PR #5699, #5131/PR #5698, #5235/PR #5707, #5279/PR #5706 all merged between 11:59Z and 13:21Z, and #5401 closed completed at 12:05Z with no PR — correct, since it was the ordered survey leg and a PR would have been the wrong artefact. Ledger updated to 73 cards / 69 PRs.

    Two items were parked for the maintainer that are no longer parked. A successor reading the old body would have re-escalated both:

    One standing prohibition needs re-reading rather than inheriting. The old body said "do not dispatch a card that must touch content/docs/** or apps/site/** until #5668 is fixed." #5668 is still open (domain:devx, assigned, pm:blocked) — but #5665, whose diff does touch content/docs/**, merged at 16:04Z, so the practical block has lifted. Both facts are recorded in §5 without collapsing them into each other; round 17's briefs carry a stop-and-report rather than an assumption in either direction.

    Two corrections to inherited practice, both measured this round and both in §5:

    1. scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs is the wrong tree for this lane. It lives in objectstack and derives against objectstack's workflows; objectui has no scripts/pm/ at all. Pointed at objectui paths it prints a confident, well-formatted gate list — check:slot-lookup, check-plugin-teardown-shape and four more — none of which exists in objectui. Its --tier line remains usable as a floor; its gate families are not. objectui's real gates come from its own 22 workflows and root package.json.
    2. Clause ② trips on the SURFACE, not the package. Round 17 has one card editing packages/types that does trip (theme.zod.ts re-exports spec zod validators by reference — the spec-mirroring face) and one editing packages/auth that does not (an internal React hook no metadata author writes against). Published ≠ contract face.

    Two maintainer instructions recorded in §1 as policy, superseding inherited lines: 「并发保持3」 (replaces the standing batch-5) and 「你虽然是 opus，但是可以派 fable 的卡」 — the latter is why round 17's clause-② card went out at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER instead of below-tier with a compensating label, which matters here because needs:contract-review does not exist in this repo at all (ensure-pm-labels.sh:238 creates it for objectstack only).

    Round 17 dispatched 19:58Z: #5710 (claude-fable-5), #5619 (opus), #5637 (opus), all mode:subagent, fences disjoint.

    Generated by Claude Code

  5. os-zhuang commented on Aug 22, 2026

    @os-zhuang
    os-zhuang
    on Aug 22, 2026 – with Claude
    Contributor

    Audit — mid-round state changes, round 17. Body refreshes at the round boundary as usual; these are recorded now rather than held in session memory, since two of them correct the body I wrote an hour ago.

    1. §6 was wrong about #5344 the moment I wrote it — my error, and the freshness gate is what caught it. I carried the predecessor's "awaiting the maintainer" entry forward without re-reading the card. #5344 had in fact been ruled at 2026-08-22T02:25Z in the 「接受所有」 decision-inbox batch: option D now, option A conditional on a legacy population being proven to exist. The predecessor's §6 had been stale for ~9 hours and I inherited the staleness instead of measuring it. The rule that would have prevented this is the one already in the notes — re-read comments later than the body before recording or re-recording a decision — and it applies to the body I am writing, not only to the cards I am dispatching.

    2. The conditional is now closed. Maintainer, 2026-08-22, verbatim: 「无」 — there is no known population of pre-#4001 stored view documents carrying accessorKey columns. So D alone; A does not land, patchIdentity's writeback is untouched, and column-identity.ts:36-47 is not amended (that obligation was attached to A only). Recorded on the card with the consequences spelled out.

    Stale-assignee repair in the same write: #5344 had carried os-sales since a round-12 dispatch whose dev correctly returned needs_decision with no PR. Back in pm:queue since 02:25Z but still assigned — a half-state invisible to candidate queries (which need pm:queue and no assignee) and to stale-claim reclaim (which keys off a live claim). Cleared, reason on the card.

    ⚠️ #5344 is a round-18 candidate, not a round-17 one: batch ceiling is 3 and its file sits under packages/app-shell/src/views/**, which #5619 holds. Whoever takes it re-reads #5619's landed shape first.

    3. #5451 re-queued by maintainer instruction — verbatim: 「5451 重新入队」. pm:dispatched → pm:queue in one label write; it had no assignee to clear. ⛔ Still carries no domain:*, so it remains unclaimable by any seat until triage routes it; this seat left a routing hint on the card and deliberately did not apply a label.

    4. Two cards became candidates mid-round, and a successor should not assume the batch was chosen from the current field. #5424 and #5034 both carried the non-agent assignee qq9340100 when round 17's candidates were read at ~19:52Z, so both were correctly excluded as claimed. Both are now unassigned (measured 20:0xZ) — the assignee was removed by someone outside this session. They are domain:ui + pm:queue Bugs and, by the age-ordered Bug tier, would have outranked at least one card actually dispatched.

    ⚠️ #5034 carries a label/body mismatch that must be settled before anyone dispatches it: its body opens with Blocked-by: objectui#4989, but it is labelled pm:queue, not pm:blocked. Under the standing rule a card with an unresolved Blocked-by: is not dispatchable whatever its queue label says. Verify #4989's state before treating #5034 as available — do not read the pm:queue label as clearance. Reported to triage; not relabelled here.

    Generated by Claude Code

  6. os-warren
    changed the title [-][pm:seat] domain:ui — objectui execution seat[/-] [+][pm:seat] domain:ui — objectui execution seat · 🟢 session_019ZyKZejBWZoCSj1NP35wcp · R34 open ~04:00Z 08-24 · in flight 0 · 5 half-states repaired at takeover[/+] on Aug 24, 2026

  7. os-warren commented on Aug 24, 2026

    @os-warren
    os-warren
    on Aug 24, 2026 – with Claude
    Collaborator

    Audit — seat takeover, 2026-08-24 ~04:00Z. Body rewritten and compacted; this comment is the audit trail and carries no state.

    In: session_019ZyKZejBWZoCSj1NP35wcp, at the maintainer's explicit direction — verbatim: 「你接手」. Out: session_01EuPCi56cnGyykygi3z9w4m, dark since its 17:57Z body write.

    The mutex readings, and the one that mattered

    Recorded so the next reader can re-check rather than trust me. The three prescribed readings all read clear:

    1. Last shift briefing in the body = 17:57Z (~10 h, many rounds stale).
    2. Newest open-round marker = the R33 dispatch line, ~17:50Z — equally stale.
    3. Newest non-self Claim: on a pm:dispatched card in this lane = none — there are zero pm:dispatched cards in the lane.

    ⛔ All three were clear and all three were wrong. Fourteen cards closed in this lane between 19:44Z and 02:51Z, and five PRs merged in a single queue trip at 02:50:2x–02:50:38Z — sixteen minutes before this session began reading. A session was working the seat the whole time.

    Reading 3 is structurally blind to it. It looks for a claim on a card labelled pm:dispatched, and the working session never used that label: its cards went pm:queue → closed. So "no pm:dispatched cards" read as nobody home when it actually meant this session doesn't use that label.

    What settled it was one read the protocol does not ask for: the claim comment on the most recently closed card (#4919), which says "dispatched by PM session 68ad4d1a-c111-591c-9633-f2fb64fa1803" at 02:09:40Z, with its dev's report at 02:41:26Z and PR #5941 merged 02:50:38Z. ✅ Proposed amendment to the mutex read, recorded in §2: also read the newest CLOSED card in the lane, not only the pm:dispatched ones. A stale seat post plus an unused status label is otherwise indistinguishable from a free seat.

    This session therefore stopped short of writing on its first pass and put the collision to the maintainer rather than claiming cards a live session was holding. The takeover proceeds only on the explicit instruction above.

    Liveness re-verified before writing anything

    Five half-states repaired

    Every one was pm:queue + assigned with its PR already merged and no remote branch — the shape that is invisible to candidate queries (which need pm:queue and no assignee) and to stale-claim reclaim (which keys off a live claim). Assignees cleared on all five; details in §3.

    #4015 got more than an assignee clear, because its label was actively lying. It is the maintainer's Option-C decision anchor; the objectui residue landed as PR #5907 and the enforcement lands upstream (objectstack#11437 / PR #11560, relayed by the spec seat at 03:28Z). It was advertising pm:queue — dispatchable — when nothing on it is dispatchable here. Moved to pm:blocked with Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#11437 written into the body so the unlock scan can reach it.

    ⚠️ Two judgments left deliberately un-made, and flagged rather than silently resolved: #5674 and #5605 both landed stage 1 of a two-stage retirement, with stage 2 separately carded (#5892, #5919) and currently pm:on-hold — whose gating condition ("stage-1 deprecation shipping") has now fired. Whether the stage-1 cards should close and the stage-2 cards unpark is a triage grading call, not this seat's. Assignees cleared; state otherwise untouched.

    One platform fact that reverses a standing instruction in §5

    ⛔ The REST channel the predecessor's notes tell the next PM to use is dead in this session. GH_TOKEN is set, but curl https://api.github.com/... returns 403: GitHub access is not enabled for this session. An org admin must connect the Claude GitHub App for this organization. The refusal is the agent proxy's, not GitHub's.

    That instruction existed because MCP list_issues's labels parameter is an OR, not an AND — re-confirmed independently at takeover: domain:ui ∩ pm:dispatched returned 135 items against the lane's own 132, and a result wider than either input is the tell. With REST unavailable the working method is to request one label and intersect client-side over two pages. Recorded in §5 so the next session does not spend a round rediscovering a 403.

    Generated by Claude Code

  8. os-warren commented on Aug 24, 2026

    @os-warren
    os-warren
    on Aug 24, 2026 – with Claude
    Collaborator

    Round-open marker — R34 dispatched 2026-08-24 ~04:08Z by session_019ZyKZejBWZoCSj1NP35wcp. Audit only; the body remains authoritative and refreshes at the round boundary.

    Five cards, all mode:subagent, all model: opus (Fable quota exhausted per the maintainer's 2026-08-23 instruction — a tier fact, not a density one, so density stays at five).

    card surface (full path, verified before fencing) note
    #5522 apps/console/.env.production + packages/app-shell/src/observability/sentry.ts Bug. ⚠️ a same-named branch already exists on the remote — dev told to read it and declare continue-or-replace
    #5721 packages/data-objectstack/src/index.ts Bug. Envelope shape for this route face is unmeasured — briefed as a measurement, not a spec
    #5631 packages/components/src/renderers/basic/icon.tsx Ruled (2026-08-22, option A). Clause-②: yes — see below
    #5916 packages/plugin-detail/src/renderers/record-path.tsx Bug. ⚠️ premise at risk — file rewritten hours ago by PR #5917
    #5909 packages/app-shell/src/views/InterfaceListPage.tsx ⚠️ file moved twice today (#5860, #5908)

    Fences are disjoint by full path, not by basename. #5522 and #5909 both sit inside packages/app-shell but in src/observability/ and src/views/ respectively — different files, different directories. This is the check the seat post's §5 exists to enforce, and it was run rather than assumed.

    #5632 is deliberately held out of this round. The #5631 ruling's own sequencing note requires the ui:icon key change to land before the BARE_SPREAD_ON_SVG burn-down batch, or for that batch to exclude ui:icon's row. Dispatching both concurrently would have raced exactly the row the ruling names.

    #5631's clause-② handling, stated openly rather than left as a gap. The card changes which authoring key ui:icon consults, so a node authoring name stops resolving — that is accept/reject behaviour on an authoring surface, and the honest declaration is yes. The contract-review tier is Fable and Fable is exhausted; needs:contract-review does not exist as a label in this repo. So it goes out at Opus under the recorded quota exemption, declared in the claim comment. ⛔ The exemption covers the tier, not the scope — the dev is fenced to the ruling's four parts.

    Two cards carry an explicit falsification licence. #5916's file was rewritten by PR #5917 (which closed a different card, #5768) and #5909's twice today, so both briefs say premise_still_valid: false with no PR is a legitimate delivery. The predecessor's most expensive failures came from dispatching against stale premises; these two are the shapes most likely to reproduce it.

    Generated by Claude Code

  9. os-warren
    changed the title [-][pm:seat] domain:ui — objectui execution seat · 🟢 session_019ZyKZejBWZoCSj1NP35wcp · R34 open ~04:00Z 08-24 · in flight 0 · 5 half-states repaired at takeover[/-] [+][pm:seat] domain:ui — objectui execution seat · 🟢 session_019ZyKZejBWZoCSj1NP35wcp · R34 closed 07:23Z 08-24 · 3 cards / 4 PRs merged · in flight 0 · 1 escalation[/+] on Aug 24, 2026
  10. os-warren
    changed the title [-][pm:seat] domain:ui — objectui execution seat · 🟢 session_019ZyKZejBWZoCSj1NP35wcp · R34 closed 07:23Z 08-24 · 3 cards / 4 PRs merged · in flight 0 · 1 escalation[/-] [+][pm:seat] domain:ui — objectui execution seat · ⚪ VACANT since 07:30Z 08-24 · last: R34 closed 3 cards / 4 PRs · in flight 0 · 1 escalation (#5631)[/+] on Aug 24, 2026

  11. yinlianghui commented on Aug 24, 2026

    @yinlianghui
    yinlianghui
    on Aug 24, 2026 – with Claude
    Contributor

    Round-open marker — R35 opening 2026-08-24T09:5xZ by session_01CSoz9uGhaaSgiq3hshtN7L, taking the seat left VACANT at 07:30Z. Audit only; the body stays authoritative and refreshes at the round boundary.

    Mutex — all four readings, including the one this seat added

    # reading result
    1 last shift briefing in the body 07:30Z, 2h13m stale — a clean, deliberate stand-down
    2 newest round-open marker R34 @ 04:09Z — older than the briefing
    3 newest non-self Claim: on a pm:dispatched card none — zero pm:dispatched cards in the lane
    4 newest CLOSED card in the lane (this post's own amendment) #4015, closed 08:08:34Z

    ⚠️ Reading 4 fired exactly as designed, and it is why this marker is worth reading. There is a write cluster at 08:08:00–08:08:41Z — eight cards touched 38 minutes after the seat closed (#5957, #5956, #5953, #5950, #5949, #5930, #5893, #4015). Under the three prescribed readings alone that is invisible, and it is precisely the shape that fooled the 04:00Z takeover.

    It resolves clear, on evidence rather than on absence: #4015's closing comment is signed "Unlock scan (triage Routine seat, hourly round)" — the triage Routine relabelling R34's findings and closing #4015 because upstream objectstack#11437 landed. Triage never claims and never dispatches, so it is not a competing execution seat. Corroborating liveness probes, all negative:

    Seat taken. Batch 5, tier opus (Fable exhausted — a tier fact, not a density one).

    Four inherited items corrected by measurement, not inherited

    1. ⛔ The body's Console/app-shell Sentry: a live DSN with sendDefaultPii: true is committed in apps/console/.env.production and baked into every production build — the VITE_SENTRY_ENABLED switch is build-time and absent from the inlined env, so a shipped bundle cannot be silenced #5522 warning is half-wrong, and the wrong half is the actionable one. It says the pre-existing branch claude/issue-5522-sentry-disableable-telemetry "carries real work — declare continue-or-replace". Those two commits (e94b85847, f751c0288) are PR console/app-shell: stop shipping an un-disableable Sentry DSN, and make sendDefaultPii opt-in (#5522) #5559, which merged 2026-08-21. Verified on origin/main: .env.production carries no DSN (and now carries a long warning comment), resolveSentryGate exists, sendDefaultPii is opt-in, the ratchet test is in place. The branch is spent, not WIP — the next dev replaces, it does not continue.
    2. Console/app-shell Sentry: a live DSN with sendDefaultPii: true is committed in apps/console/.env.production and baked into every production build — the VITE_SENTRY_ENABLED switch is build-time and absent from the inlined env, so a shipped bundle cannot be silenced #5522's real remaining scope is the consumer half, and its blocker is gone. objectstack#10805 closed 2026-08-23T16:57Z via merged PR objectstack#11382 ("serve a fail-closed SPA telemetry permission on /api/v1/runtime/config"). Triage released the card at 01:37Z flagged "P0-family security … treat as front-of-lane". Taken at front of lane accordingly.
    3. plugin-form: narrow navigateOnSuccess to the ruled relative-only acceptance set and escape the interpolated id (point 3 — points 1 and 2 landed in PR #5558) #5034 is NOT available — it carries assignee qq9340100. The R17 audit note recording it as cleared is stale. Not touched.
    4. Console AI chat (ADR-0057) — post-cleanup UX follow-ups #2477's item 2 appears already landed — packages/app-shell/src/views/studio-design/__tests__/studioChatDockPersistence.test.tsx exists on main. The card is the oldest in the lane and would otherwise have gone out this round; dispatching it against that premise would have bought a no-op. Deferred for re-scoping, reported to triage rather than relabelled here.

    fold-or-serial, answered rather than defaulted

    #5956 + #5957 — FOLD, pre-registered for R36 (both packages/plugin-detail/src/renderers/record-path.tsx). Five gates: ① same defect shape — both are accessible-name defects on the same stage readout, and #5916 already built the i18n seam they both land in (record-path.stageStateAccessibleName.i18n.test.tsx); ② one file, one changeset; ③ both graded by triage at 08:08Z, neither in the decision box; ④ independently checkable (state reaches the accessible name / labels localized + the role-less div given a role or its label dropped); ⑤ exclusion list — #5916 is merged and not a member.

    ⛔ Not folded and not co-batched: #3880. #5956/#5957 must add locale keys across packages/i18n/src/locales/*.ts, which is #3880's exact write surface. #3880 is 16 days older, so it goes this round and the record-path pair serializes behind it.

    Also serialized, and why — both are surface collisions, not judgements about the cards:

    Two cards were unblocked by upstream landings and nobody had noticed

    Stale-claim suspects for the next round

    #4795 and #3965 carry assignee yinlianghui — which is this seat's own GitHub identity, so the body's description of them as "non-agent assignees" is wrong; they are earlier sessions' claims under the shared identity. Both are >24h with no branch on the remote. They are stale-claim reclaim candidates; ⛔ not reclaimed this round (that needs the enquiry-and-silence window, not a same-minute decision).

    Generated by Claude Code

  12. yinlianghui
    changed the title [-][pm:seat] domain:ui — objectui execution seat · ⚪ VACANT since 07:30Z 08-24 · last: R34 closed 3 cards / 4 PRs · in flight 0 · 1 escalation (#5631)[/-] [+][pm:seat] domain:ui — objectui execution seat · 🟢 session_01CSoz9uGhaaSgiq3hshtN7L · R35 dispatched 09:55Z 08-24 · in flight 5 · queue ~70 · 1 escalation (#5631)[/+] on Aug 24, 2026
  13. yinlianghui
    changed the title [-][pm:seat] domain:ui — objectui execution seat · 🟢 session_01CSoz9uGhaaSgiq3hshtN7L · R35 dispatched 09:55Z 08-24 · in flight 5 · queue ~70 · 1 escalation (#5631)[/-] [+][pm:seat] domain:ui — objectui execution seat · 🟢 session_01CSoz9uGhaaSgiq3hshtN7L · R35 closed 10:43Z 08-24 · 5/5 accepted · 4 merged · in flight 0 · 1 awaiting human merge[/+] on Aug 24, 2026

  14. yinlianghui commented on Aug 24, 2026

    @yinlianghui
    yinlianghui
    on Aug 24, 2026 – with Claude
    Contributor

    Round-open marker — R36 dispatched 2026-08-24 ~10:50Z by session_01CSoz9uGhaaSgiq3hshtN7L. Audit only; the body stays authoritative and refreshes at the round boundary.

    Six cards, five dispatches (one folded pair), all mode:subagent, all model: opus. Dispatched immediately on R35's close — ⛔ a round boundary is not a wait-for-the-human point.

    dispatch cards surface (full path, resolved before fencing)
    1 #5930 packages/components/src/renderers/overlay/dropdown-menu.tsx + examples/schema-catalog/src/schemas/components-overlay-dropdown-menu/
    2 #5956 + #5957 (FOLD) packages/plugin-detail/src/renderers/record-path.tsx + packages/i18n/src/locales/*.ts
    3 #4600 examples/schema-catalog/src/schemas/plugin-dashboard/ + packages/types/src/complex.ts
    4 #3909 packages/types/src/data.ts
    5 #5949 packages/react/src/LazyPluginLoader.tsx

    Two collisions resolved by full-path fencing, not by basename: #4600 and #3909 both write packages/types (complex.ts vs data.ts); #4600 and #5930 both write examples/schema-catalog/ (plugin-dashboard/ vs components-overlay-dropdown-menu/). Both pairs fenced explicitly in their claims, and #4600 is told ⛔ not to add a catalog-wide gate — #4616 records 35 non-dashboard entries a wide gate would light up.

    ⛔ #5980 could NOT be dispatched, and the previous marker was wrong to promise it

    The R35 close-out named #5980 "front of R36". It carries no labels at all — no domain:*, no pm-state. Under the single-producer rule, domain:* comes only from the triage seat and 未打标签的 issue 任何人不得认领. Claiming it would have been this seat producing a routing label.

    Reported to triage instead; it goes out the round after it is graded. ⚠️ Recording the near-miss because the pull was real: the card is a doc teaching a shape #5981 just made refused, so it feels urgent — and that is exactly when a seat is most likely to reach across the single-producer line.

    Two cards carry embedded judgements, and the briefs say which kind

    #5956/#5957 both name a decision (what a won terminus should announce; whether the lost group should be announced at all). Briefed as accessibility/copy judgements inside the fence — make them and justify them, ⛔ do not escalate a wording choice — with a stop-and-report if either turns out to change what a stage means rather than what it says.

    #5930 self-describes as a contract question with three options. Two are already settled by evidence on the tree (⛔ LazyIcon ruled out by #5622/#5633 — it degrades an unknown name to the Database glyph, trading a no-icon failure for a wrong-icon one; ⛔ retiring the key is the manual floor). So it went out as a ruling with a falsifiable premise attached: route is resolveIcon, premise is that resolveIcon is reachable from renderers/overlay/ without a layering inversion, and ⛔ if the premise fails the dev reports the fork rather than silently switching options.

    🎉 The decision inbox is EMPTY — and that is new state this seat did not produce

    needs-user-decision in objectui: 0. The maintainer drained it in a live PM chat between ~09:50Z and ~10:34Z; the triage seat recorded each ruling verbatim on its card. #5631 — this lane's one escalation — is ruled A′ (2026-08-24, 「5631 A′，按一次正经的契约迁移立项。」): the full chartered contract migration at its true measured price, ~29 files across four workspace entries, Clause-②: yes, and the #5632 SVG burn-down keeps excluding ui:icon's ledger row until it lands.

    ⚠️ Consequence for whoever dispatches next: five freshly-ruled, high-value cards landed in pm:queue while R35 was in flight — #5631, #5853 (canonical = the renderer's live read set), #5927, #5293, #5913. ⛔ Read each ruling before dispatching. R35's own lesson was that a ruled card and an unruled one are label-identical; these are the same shape, one day fresher.

    Generated by Claude Code

  15. yinlianghui
    changed the title [-][pm:seat] domain:ui — objectui execution seat · 🟢 session_01CSoz9uGhaaSgiq3hshtN7L · R35 closed 10:43Z 08-24 · 5/5 accepted · 4 merged · in flight 0 · 1 awaiting human merge[/-] [+][pm:seat] domain:ui — objectui execution seat · 🟢 session_01CSoz9uGhaaSgiq3hshtN7L · R38 dispatched 12:45Z 08-24 · in flight 5 · 1 rework · 5 awaiting a human[/+] on Aug 24, 2026

  16. 589 remaining items

  17. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 19, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 19, 2026
    Contributor

    Cross-lane declaration from objectui domain:devx seat 1 (objectui#5748) · os-warren · session_01FM29ZqLTrnPNXxijioZwMp · 2026-10-19T04:54Z. ⛔ Not a claim on any card of your lane. A reply is owed only on an objection.

    Generated by Claude Code

  18. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 19, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 19, 2026
    Contributor

    Delta · domain:ui seat 1 · session_0188TsgPV8kQXfuRuKmkj2ks · 2026-10-19T07:29Z

    Supersedes delta 6259881048 where they conflict:

    Generated by Claude Code

  19. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 19, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 19, 2026
    Contributor

    Clock-out brief · domain:ui seat 1 · sunhaolin · session_0188TsgPV8kQXfuRuKmkj2ks · 2026-10-19T14:40Z

    This seat is ⏳ vacant, on the maintainer's 「当前任务处理完，合并后就下班」. This brief is the release marker: a successor takes the seat at once with /pm-dispatch 接手, then reads the body above.

    • In flight: none. No stay-behind, and no timer left: the seat Routine trig_014AfuNugxWEq73hyToHVvNE is deleted.
    • This sitting's last work: ruling B on objectui#12955, landed in both repositories and verified end to end. The verification comment is on objectui#12955.
    • First for a successor: the released queue in body §2. The two p1s are objectui#12932 and list-view: the spec's new ComponentPropsMap row judges list-view — measure its 38 unpublished spec keys against ListViewBlock, publish the ones it honours, and strike the OWED rows objectui#12971 books #13047; both strike rows in registry-inputs-spec-parity, so run them one at a time.
    • check-handover.mjs (objectui and objectstack): run before this write, exit 0 on both.
    • ⚠️ Correction to body §1: an earlier sitter's timer IS listable from this account. trig_015jTgLscLAc6CjWoeA9Jsed ("ui seat 1 PM fire", 44 * * * *, enabled) fires into cse_013r2cLzuhBQfmLZv7Cxh9nt, and its last run (13:45Z) succeeded. It is not this session's, so it was not deleted here; whether it should be is the maintainer's call. Its prompt continues the seat loop in that session. If it fires, its read must meet this brief and the vacant body, and a takeover from it is a seating like any other.

    Generated by Claude Code

  20. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 19, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 19, 2026
    Contributor

    Opening marker · seating · domain:ui seat 1 · huangyiirene · session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 · 2026-10-19T16:06Z

    Takeover audit. ⛔ Not a claim on any card.

  21. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 20, 2026
    Contributor

    Delta · domain:ui seat 1 · session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 · 2026-10-20T02:21Z

    This comment supersedes §2's posture line until the next fold.

  22. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 20, 2026
    Contributor

    Delta · domain:ui seat 1 · session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 · 2026-10-20T04:49Z

    This comment supersedes §1's dispatch posture and §2's in-flight line until the next fold.

  23. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 20, 2026
    Contributor

    Delta · domain:ui seat 1 · session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 · 2026-10-20T06:15Z

    This comment supersedes the earlier deltas' in-flight lines until the next fold. Posture: concurrent, batch 3 (「并发3」).

  24. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 20, 2026
    Contributor

    Delta · domain:ui seat 1 · session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 · 2026-10-20T07:30Z

    This comment supersedes the earlier deltas' in-flight and landing lines until the next fold. Posture: concurrent, batch 3 (「并发3」).

  25. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 20, 2026
    Contributor

    Delta · domain:ui seat 1 · session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 · 2026-10-20T08:56Z

    This comment supersedes the earlier deltas' in-flight and landing lines until the next fold. Posture: concurrent, batch 3 (「并发3」).

  26. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 20, 2026
    Contributor

    Delta · domain:ui seat 1 · session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 · 2026-10-20T10:23Z

    This comment supersedes the earlier deltas' in-flight and landing lines until the next fold.

    Posture: concurrent, batch 5, with cloud dispatch allowed. These are the maintainer's 「任务很多，并发加到5」 and 「可以派云卡」, which supersede 「并发3」. Cloud stays reserved for L/XL cards, or when the local verify-lock depth reaches 2. The hourly fire (trig_01GXw4Cq8f3SaB5aEUb7oDkG) carries the new posture.

  27. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 20, 2026
    Contributor

    Delta · domain:ui seat 1 · session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 · 2026-10-20T12:20Z

    This comment supersedes the earlier deltas' in-flight and landing lines until the next fold. Posture unchanged: batch 5, cloud allowed.

  28. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 20, 2026
    Contributor

    Delta · domain:ui seat 1 · session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 · 2026-10-20T13:47Z

    This comment supersedes the earlier deltas' in-flight and landing lines until the next fold.

  29. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 21, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 21, 2026
    Contributor

    Delta · domain:ui seat 1 · session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 · 2026-10-21T00:26Z

    This comment supersedes the earlier deltas' in-flight and landing lines until the next fold.

    • Posture unchanged: batch 5, cloud allowed, priority:p3 cards only (「当前任务处理完，后续只派 p3 的卡」), write budget at the default 40 per hour.
    • Gap: this seat's worker was down from about 14:40Z to 00:15Z. The hourly fires in that span queued and were answered together at 00:17Z.
    • Landed since 6292376455: objectui#13254, part 2 → PR fix(app-shell): the language menu asks before a switch drops a page's unsaved edits (objectui#13254) #13263 588d11d (the language menu asks first). The card is closed completed by the seat's hand, with both PRs named in its landing note.
    • Unlocked by the pin bump to 06cab4849a8a (PR chore(deps): move .objectstack-sha to objectstack 18.0.0 version commit 06cab4849a (objectui#13261) #13266):
      • objectui#13216: it needed objectstack 99e4eaa227. Re-claimed 6304863865, route A (a field-face resolver seam), Clause-②: yes.
      • objectui#12484: it needed objectstack b9d0c48a5d; objectstack triage moved it to pm:queue at 6296388913. Claimed 6304855892.
      • objectui#13119 was closed by another seat at 18:42Z.
    • In flight (2 of 5): objectui#12484 and objectui#13216. Their file surfaces are disjoint: apps/console approvals for the first, packages/components and packages/fields for the second.
    • Queue: no other pm:queue priority:p3 domain:ui card is open in objectui or objectstack at this delta.

  30. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 21, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 21, 2026
    Contributor

    Delta · domain:ui seat 1 · session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 · 2026-10-21T02:15Z

    This comment supersedes the earlier deltas' in-flight and landing lines until the next fold.

    • Posture: concurrency 1, per the maintainer's 「并发1」 (about 01:45Z). It supersedes 「任务很多，并发加到5」, 「并发3」 and 「串行派发」. Cards are still priority:p3 only, cloud dispatch is still allowed, and the write budget is the default 40 per hour. The hourly fire's stored prompt says the same.
    • Landed since 6304906771:
    • Closed: objectui#12045 (B1), whose last step was objectui#12484. A pointer on the epic objectui#2763 names what is left there: B2 (the list view) is unfiled, and B3 is half done.
    • In flight: none.
    • Queue: no pm:queue priority:p3 domain:ui card is open in objectui or objectstack at this delta.

  31. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 21, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    objectstack-fleetBot
    on Oct 21, 2026
    Contributor

    Clock-out brief · domain:ui seat 1 · huangyiirene · session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 · 2026-10-21T08:33Z

    The seat is vacant from this comment on. The maintainer's word, in this session's chat: 「你可以下班了。」 The body was refreshed to ⏳ vacant with the successor's ledger just before this comment. This comment is the release marker: a successor may sit at once.

    • In flight: none. No claim of this session is open: check-handover.mjs --session=session_014MXhk1yjWh37d634hLy3p7 --account=huangyiirene exits 0. No PR of this seat is open or in the merge queue. No dev agent or cloud session is running.
    • Stay-behind: none. This session writes nothing more on the lane.
    • Timers: the seat's scheduled fire trig_01GXw4Cq8f3SaB5aEUb7oDkG is deleted. No one-shot check-in of this session is pending.
    • Worktrees: none left on disk. Every dev removed its own after its last push.
    • The sitting's record: the opening marker 6271608923, the delta comments 6281838869 through 6306334791, and each card's LANDED note.
    • Posture, ⛔ not inherited: concurrency 1 and priority:p3 only were said to this session. A successor starts from the protocol default unless the maintainer restates them.
    • Carried on cards, not this body:
    • Seat correction on the record: the two contract-review records on PR fix(components,fields): head a widget-hinted nameField through its face (objectui#13216) #13291 read Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER. The line was carried from an earlier template, not read from --tier. They were this seat's own in-session review of a Clause-②: yes declaration face, which the charter serves at TIER_DEFAULT.

    Successor: /pm-dispatch 接手, then read the body and any comment newer than it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    pm:seat

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions