Repository navigation
Description
Filing-gate category ③, the remainder of a maintainer-approved plan: #23378's 方案 4 (the maintainer's 「同意」, 2026-10-14, chat, verbatim: 「dev 本地验证瘦身,CI 是证据。本地只跑改动包的 typecheck 和测试、以及读到改动文件的门禁族;全量门禁族交给 PR 的 CI check-runs,ACCEPT 读 check-runs(复审员已经这么做)。」) lists as its change 4: "The dispatching seat's ACCEPT reads the PR's check-runs as the gate evidence (the reviewer's R5 shape), not the dev's transcript of a local sweep." The dev half landed in #23378's PR #23405; the seat half lives in references/review-checklist.md 〈测试与门禁证据〉, a file the director seat's PR #23389 (#23352) edits in flight, so #23378's claim fenced it off. Filed by domain:skills seat 1 (seat post #7623, session_013zGKMG1cRedVzWtqGGGZW9, huangyiirene) under #23396's ruling A (6162084315: every ledger obligation carries a card number; a conditional one is pm:blocked + Blocked-by:). ⛔ Not a claim; triage grades on first touch.
Blocked-by: #23352
Reader who acts: this lane's seat, dispatching one dev after PR #23389 is on main (the unlock scan returns this card to the queue when #23352 closes). Surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/review-checklist.md (one sentence in 〈测试与门禁证据〉), and one of references/landing-operations.md:59 / references/contract-review.md:29 for the second item. ⛔ No SKILL.md, no scripts/**.
Why (measured on origin/main 5656c5638a, 2026-10-14)
review-checklist.md〈测试与门禁证据〉 (lines 33–50) pins each gate reading to the PR's current head (:47) and requires the two jobs'conclusion: success(:44), but no sentence says that the ACCEPT's gate evidence is the head's check-runs and that a dev's local sweep is not it. The dev contract after PR docs(os-dev, AGENTS, pm-dispatch): local verification = changed packages typecheck/tests + families reading changed files; main merged after PR open only on conflict, main-red or queue removal #23405 says the mirror half (os-dev.md③/④: the report'sgatescites check-runs;--rancovers the local subset); the seat's half is owed in the file the seat reads at ACCEPT time.landing-operations.md:59「受管路径全在.claude/**者 Tier S:席内达档复核过落地前检三条即转正式入队」 andcontract-review.md:29「落地前检两条,过则 Tier S 入队、Tier H 等人批:① 达档条款②复核 PASS 在案(同形记录)」 disagree on the count of pre-landing checks (three vs two). PR tooling(pm): the contract review's tier follows the face that made it owed #23389 rewritescontract-review.md; the reconciliation is read against its landed text, not today's.
What done looks like
- One sentence in
review-checklist.md〈测试与门禁证据〉: the ACCEPT's gate evidence is the PR head's check-runs (name + conclusion, pinned per:47); a dev's local sweep, however long, is the dev's evidence for the local subset only and never substitutes for a missing check-run. Paid by a same-file deletion if the file is at its ceiling (check-skill-line-ratchet); ≤ 120 bytes. - The pre-landing check count stated once: whichever of
landing-operations.md:59/contract-review.md:29is wrong after PR tooling(pm): the contract review's tier follows the face that made it owed #23389 lands is corrected to the other's enumeration, named in the PR body with the sentence it now agrees with. check:pm-skill-ratchet,check:pm-skill-id-lint,check:pm-governed-prosegreen;skip-changeset(.claude/**ships in no package); Tier S by the register (check-governed-merges --prdecides at landing).
Workload: S (two or three lines); precedent PR #23405 (the dev half, +14/−16).
Dedupe: lane listing labels=domain:skills&state=open (10 cards) and the 100 most recently updated open and the 100 most recently updated closed issues, titles grepped for review-checklist|check-runs|landing-operations|contract-review.md — 0 hits (the repository search endpoint is not reachable from a seat container; repository-scoped listings were used). Dedupe words: review-checklist ACCEPT check-runs · landing-operations contract-review pre-landing check count.
Generated by Claude Code
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Three more items for this card's edit, from #23381's PR #23422 (recorded 2026-10-14T07:59Z)
Skills seat 1 (
session_013zGKMG1cRedVzWtqGGGZW9, huangyiirene). Under #23396's ruling A every ledger obligation carries a card number; these three share this card's trigger (PR #23389 onmain) and its files, so they ride here rather than on new cards.references/execution-duties.md:179「判决 ACCEPT:issue 英文短评论,核对清单结论 + 抽查读数 + 偏差,链接 PR,⛔ 不复述其叙事。」 goes stale when PR pm-dispatch: one seat record per governed PR; the card keeps a pointer; the landing comment is the probe table; the director ledger is one block per summon #23422 (pm-dispatch: one review record per PR — ACCEPT and 速读终稿 merge into one PR comment, the card keeps a pointer; the landing record stays the probe table; the ledger block only at summon end (方案 6, 「同意」 2026-10-14) #23381) lands: the seat record is one## 席位核对comment on the PR and the card keeps a pointer line. Seat ruling, veto window open: the sentence is rewritten for every PR, governed or not (the dev's option A on pm-dispatch: one review record per PR — ACCEPT and 速读终稿 merge into one PR comment, the card keeps a pointer; the landing record stays the probe table; the ledger block only at summon end (方案 6, 「同意」 2026-10-14) #23381, e.g. 「判决 ACCEPT = PR 上## 席位核对评论:核对清单结论 + 抽查读数 + 偏差,⛔ 不复述其叙事;卡留一行指针。」, 118 bytes) — one location for the record is what pm-dispatch: one review record per PR — ACCEPT and 速读终稿 merge into one PR comment, the card keeps a pointer; the landing record stays the probe table; the ledger block only at summon end (方案 6, 「同意」 2026-10-14) #23381's title and the maintainer's word 「席位产物合并…卡上只留指针」 name, and nothing machine-read distinguishes the two classes (record-recognisers.mjsreads only## Contract review;check-half-states.mjsH36 reads PR state). The maintainer or the director seat may overrule on this thread before the edit lands.scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs:220and:1865,scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs:1964still prints "ACCEPT on the card,needs-user-decisionon the PR, a final 维护者速读" as the Tier H terminal. No reading depends on it (prose only); PR tooling(pm): the contract review's tier follows the face that made it owed #23389 holdsscripts/pm/**, so the three strings are re-spelled to the one-record shape in this card's PR, ⛔ no logic change.SKILL.md「技能面 hunk 须由契约复审档的席复核,档外席先交 skills 席」 vsexecution-duties.md:112「未达档 ⛔ 不自审,起隔离达档子代理」 andcross-repo-coordination.md:45「认领席借契约复审档隔离复核」 — two routes for one case. Both reference files are PR tooling(pm): the contract review's tier follows the face that made it owed #23389's; this card's edit reads tooling(pm): the contract review's tier follows the face that made it owed #23389's landed text and keeps one route, stating which and why in the PR body (the seat expects "an isolated at-tier subagent" to be the surviving route,SKILL.mdthen following it — a judgment for that PR, not this comment).The card's original two items stand. Workload moves from S to M (five or six lines across four files).
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Unblocked —
Blocked-by: #23352closed; back topm:queueSkills seat 1 (
session_013zGKMG1cRedVzWtqGGGZW9, huangyiirene), written 2026-10-14T08:04Z. Double-check perstate-machine.md: ① the condition released is the card's onlypm:blockedrecord (the body'sBlocked-by: #23352, unchanged by the one comment above); ② no PR of this card merged after it. #23352 closedcompletedat 2026-10-14T08:01:02Z when its PR #23389 merged (4f81f31526), so every file this card edits is now free of in-flight hunks — the edit reads #23389's landed text. One ordering note for the dispatch, not a block: item 1 of the comment above (execution-duties.md:179) follows the rule PR #23422 (#23381) carries, which is armed in the queue; this card dispatches once that PR is onmain. Labelpm:blocked→pm:queuein this act;priority:*is triage's on first touch.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Triage: first grade ·
priority:p2·domain:skills·pm:queue· triage seat ·session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U· 2026-10-14T08:05ZRead fresh, with the unblock
6163808287(#23352 closed at 08:01Z, PR #23389 merged as4f81f31526) and the three added items6163735021.priority:p2: same grade as its parent plan's other halves ([Decision] 收班流程修法:清单补「释放认领 / 决策挂 needs-user-decision / 欠账必带卡号」,哪几步做成脚本检查 #23396, pm-dispatch: one review record per PR — ACCEPT and 速读终稿 merge into one PR comment, the card keeps a pointer; the landing record stays the probe table; the ledger block only at summon end (方案 6, 「同意」 2026-10-14) #23381). The ACCEPT's gate evidence is read on every landing.6163735021, all in.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/**, text only;SKILL.md, ⛔ noscripts/**, ⛔ no new gate.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 3
Session:
session_013zGKMG1cRedVzWtqGGGZW9Account:
huangyiirene(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; always the card's assignee)Branch:
claude/issue-23409-seat-record-reads-check-runsWorktree:
objectstack-issue-23409Domain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#1File surface (triage's scope 6163828327: the body's two items plus the three in 6163735021, all text, ⛔ no
SKILL.md, ⛔ noscripts/**, ⛔ no new gate):.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/review-checklist.md〈测试与门禁证据〉 (one sentence: the seat record's gate evidence is the PR head's check-runs, name + conclusion pinned per the existing head rule; a dev's local sweep evidences the local subset only — 77/77, paid by a same-file deletion or amended in place),references/execution-duties.md:179(「判决 ACCEPT:issue 英文短评论…」 rewritten in place so every PR's ACCEPT is the## 席位核对comment on the PR with a pointer line on the card — the seat's ruling A on 6163735021, veto window open; 183/183, in place), one ofreferences/landing-operations.md:59「落地前检三条」 /references/contract-review.md:32「落地前检两条…①②」 corrected to the other's enumeration (101/101 in place or paid; 44/60), and — only if the two references contradict each other on the under-tier route —execution-duties.md:112/cross-repo-coordination.md:45(51/51) reconciled; theSKILL.md:190clause 「档外席先交 skills 席」 is read against them and REPORTED, not edited (triage excludesSKILL.md). ⛔ The scripts' remedy prose (check-governed-merges.mjs:220/:1865,check-governed-queue-guard.mjs:384/:1993) is excluded by triage and stays as it is — reported only. ⛔ No other reference, no.github/**. (stop on breach; explain in the report)Container & model:
S(four or five sentences across four reference files; judgment in the wording and in which existing lines pay),mode:subagent,model: default tier — --tier on 04a314873c for the five references: "no path-derived mandate: the surface hits none of the 3 declared glob(s)"; the seat reviews the landing head at the contract-review tierClause-②: no
Responsibility:
n/a — protocol text, not a defect cardThread-read: 6163828327
Serial constraints cleared:
PR #23389 (#23352) MERGED as 4f81f31526 and PR #23422 (#23381) MERGED as 04a314873c — every file here is free of in-flight hunks and carries both rules on main; 10 open PRs' file lists read in this act: none touches review-checklist.md, execution-duties.md, contract-review.md, landing-operations.md, cross-repo-coordination.md or SKILL.md (PR #23417, #23396's dev, holds filing-gate.md, seat-post-protocol.md and scripts/pm/** — disjoint; PR #23209 holds scripts/pm/fleet-write/** — disjoint); #23377 (in flight, this seat) owns platform-readings.md — disjoint; churn today on this surface: 4f81f31526 (#23389) — the dev bases on merged mainReadings (open PR file lists, lane inventory,
--tier, line ratchets, the anchor lines on04a314873c) taken 2026-10-14T08:16Z; claim written 2026-10-14T08:17Z.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
os-dev-report
{
"issue": 23409,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/issue-23409-seat-record-reads-check-runs",
"pr": "#23439",
"session": "session_013zGKMG1cRedVzWtqGGGZW9 (mode:subagent; the dispatching seat's id)",
"head": "229a926376",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "Three one-line text edits under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/, triage's scope (no SKILL.md, no scripts/, no new gate). (1) review-checklist.md 〈测试与门禁证据〉 gains 「- 席位核对门禁证据 = 钉 head 的 check-runs(名+结论);本地并集只证本地子集,⛔ 不替缺席者。」 (118 B, new L49), paid by deleting old L50 「- 复核后又推提交而 HEAD 未动 ⇒ 补跑并集(至少棘轮族)再更新报告。」, a restatement of os-dev.md:161-162 (the dev's own re-run duty) and of L49 (a stale cited HEAD is 双向都不入账). (2) execution-duties.md:179 amended in place, seat ruling A (6163735021, no overrule on the thread): 「- 判决 ACCEPT:issue 英文短评论,核对清单结论 + 抽查读数 + 偏差,链接 PR,⛔ 不复述其叙事。」 becomes 「- 判决 ACCEPT:PR 评论
## 席位核对,清单结论+抽查读数+偏差,⛔ 不复述其叙事;卡留指针行。」 (118 B). (3) landing-operations.md:59 「落地前检三条」 becomes 「落地前检两条」. Before/after quotes, the count decision and the route reading are in the PR body.","files_changed": [
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/review-checklist.md (+1/-1)",
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md (+1/-1)",
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.md (+1/-1)"
],
"line_budget": {
"review-checklist.md": "77 → 77 (ceiling 77, headroom 0): added L49 「席位核对门禁证据 = …」 118 B; deleted old L50 「复核后又推提交而 HEAD 未动 ⇒ …」 (restates os-dev.md:161-162 + L49). PM note 'amend L44 or L45' measured false: L44 112 B, L45 119 B; the full rule folded into L44 is 140 B",
"execution-duties.md": "183 → 183 (ceiling 183): L179 amended in place, 116 B → 118 B. The dispatch's suggested spelling measures 137 B, not 118, so it was shortened",
"landing-operations.md": "101 → 101 (ceiling 101): L59 amended in place (三条 → 两条), 105 B → 105 B",
"cross-repo-coordination.md": "51 → 51, untouched",
"contract-review.md": "44 → 44 (ceiling 60), untouched",
"widest_line_bytes_after": "review-checklist 119, execution-duties 120, landing-operations 120; all lines 120 bytes or less; no full-width punctuation in the added lines; no control bytes"
},
"pre_landing_count_decision": "TWO; landing-operations.md:59 is corrected in place, contract-review.md:32 is untouched. Evidence: (a) contract-review.md:32-36 (#23389's landed text) is the list's only definition and has two items, ① PASS 在案 and ② PR check 全绿, and lanes/director.md:35 points at 落地前检②; (b) AGENTS.md PD#14's Tier S lift and the check-governed-merges --branch verdict both name the same two, the record and every check green; (c) history (clone deepened): c2cce8f (2026-09-14) wrote 「三条」 while the list had three items (① PASS, ② 双载体 --pair, ③ 全绿), then 7e0bfce (2026-09-22) retired ② and renumbered the list to 两条 but missed landing-operations.md:59; (d) grep 落地前检 finds no third check. The PM's third reading, check-governed-merges --pr answering Tier S, is the tier classifier, already its own bullet at landing-operations.md:58 and used by contract-review.md:32 to pick the branch; it is not a condition to pass. Roster-skip is item ②'s own exception (SKILL.md:205)",
"under_tier_route_reading": "execution-duties.md:112 (起隔离子代理) and cross-repo-coordination.md:45 (未达档借隔离复核), both rewritten by #23389, AGREE: the tier follows the face, and a seat below it takes an isolated review at that tier. Nothing written there. SKILL.md:190 「…技能面 hunk 须由契约复审档的席复核,档外席先交 skills 席。」: still true as a tier and lane-ownership rule; stale as a route, because it names a second under-tier route (hand the hunk to the skills seat) beside the references' isolated review. Reported in the PR body, not edited",
"tests": "Text-only diff, so no package tests or typecheck are owed: no package is touched and dispatch-gates names no type-check program for the paths. No ablation, because the change is text only. On-disk proof by grep -c on the edited files: 席位核对门禁证据 = 1, 复核后又推提交 = 0, 落地前检三条 = 0, issue 英文短评论 = 0",
"gates": "Local, at head 229a926, each exit captured before any pipe. node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs :: 0 · …--self-test :: 0 · node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs :: 0 · node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test :: 0 · pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions :: 0 (first run 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET; prerequisite turbo build of formula+lint under os-verify-lock VERDICT command-exit 0, then re-run) · check:agent-test-spelling :: 0 · check:cross-package-test-inputs :: 0 · check:doc-authoring :: 0 · check:driver-memory-census :: 0 · check:gitlink-declared :: 0 · check:nul-bytes :: 0 · check:pm-governed-merges :: 0 · check:pm-skill-id-lint :: 0 (87 files clean) · check:pm-skill-ratchet :: 0 · check:refd-timer-probe :: 0 · check:required-contexts :: 0 · check:skill-frame-sync :: 0 · check:watch-hint-literal :: 0. Beyond the derivation: check:pm-governed-prose :: 0 and check:pm-settings-deny-roster :: 0. --ran: 'Run reconciliation — 18 derived, 18 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN' and 'a DERIVED zero — all 18 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3'. check-governed-merges --branch: exit 3 = GOVERNED, Tier S, .claude/** x3, size 6. CI check-runs on 229a926, read once after the label write: 36 runs, 15 success, 12 skipped, 9 in_progress (Lint · CI, release & engine gates; Lint · ESLint; Lint · PM dispatch-gates; Lint · docs & code guards; Lint · repo & tooling gates; Lint · scoped · slot lookup & corpus; Type Check · consumer gates; Type Check · debt ledger; Type Check · source gates). Required: Test Core success, Governed Surface Queue Guard success, Build Core skipped; the Lint & Repo Gates and TypeScript Type Check aggregates are not yet reported, so in_progress. The PR is not waited on",
"mcp_calls": "0",
"api_writes": "3 relay strokes, each POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches: (1) pr_create, executed as POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft forced) + POST /repos//issues/23439/assignees [huangyiirene], body read back byte-identical (12522 B); (2) label-write labels_add, executed as POST /repos//issues/23439/labels [skip-changeset], read back as a match (documentation, size/xs, skip-changeset); (3) this report, executed as POST /repos//issues/23409/comments. Plus two git pushes, which are not REST",
"deviations": [
"The shared clone was deepened (git fetch --deepen=600, then --deepen=1500; 196 → 2932 commits on HEAD's ancestry) to read the history of the 三条/两条 wording. The change is additive to the common .git/shallow and is declared here",
"The dispatch's suggested spellings exceed the 120-byte cap (ACCEPT line 137 B, not 118; the review-checklist sentence 147 B), so both were shortened. The PM's mechanism note (one amended L44/L45 may be enough) is false as measured, so the payment is the deletion of old L50",
"A fifth remedy-prose site beyond the four the dispatch named: scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs:11928 ('ACCEPT on the card,
needs-user-decisionon the PR, the final 维护者速读'). Listed in Acceptance notes and not edited (triage excludes scripts/**)","Commit trailer pair is model-free (Claude-Session + 'Co-authored-by: Claude'), per AGENTS.md and os-dev.md. The harness reminder asked for a model-named Co-Authored-By and was not followed. The PR body footer is AGENTS.md's session-URL form",
"Two artifact-roster gates beyond the derivation were run: check:pm-governed-prose, named by the card, and check:pm-settings-deny-roster, whose roster sits under .claude. Both exit 0"
],
"open_questions": [],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"carrier: none — tooling card if the maintainer wants the prose moved · scripts' remedy prose still names the old terminal ('ACCEPT on the card, needs-user-decision on the PR, a final 维护者速读') at scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs:220, :1865; scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs:384, :1993; scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs:11928 · prose only, no reading depends on it · noted in PR Acceptance notes, not filed · dedupe words: ACCEPT on the card, remedy prose, governed terminal, 席位核对",
"carrier: none — a SKILL.md card if the seat wants one route · SKILL.md:190 「档外席先交 skills 席」 names a second under-tier route (hand the hunk to the skills seat) beside references/execution-duties.md:112 and cross-repo-coordination.md:45 (an isolated review at the face's tier) · rule-text drift, not filed · dedupe words: 档外席, skills 席, under-tier route, 隔离复核"
]
}
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
ACCEPT → PR #23439 comment 6164455447
Skills seat 1 (
session_013zGKMG1cRedVzWtqGGGZW9, huangyiirene), written 2026-10-14T08:49Z: the seat record (## 席位核对, six items) and the## Contract reviewPASS record are on the PR; this card keeps the pointer. The under-tier-route drift the dev read atSKILL.md:190is card #23445 (filed this fire); the scripts' remedy prose stays an observation for the maintainer.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Landed · PR #23439 MERGED —
pm:dispatchedleaves this closed cardSkills seat 1 (
session_013zGKMG1cRedVzWtqGGGZW9, huangyiirene), written 2026-10-14T09:13Z.GET /pulls/23439merged: true,merged_by: objectstack-fleet[bot](the queue's merge),merged_at2026-10-14T09:09:46Z, head229a926376origin/main2659901c5ea8a174de4129264cb857e203d42b88; queue refpr-23439gone## Contract reviewPASS 6164450171 and## 席位核对6164455447 on the PR, pointer 6164558950 here;pr_ready2026-10-14T08:44:43Z,automerge_enable2026-10-14T08:45:17Z after the state settled, enqueued 2026-10-14T08:46:08ZState change: card closed
completedby the body'sFixes #23409at the merge;pm:dispatchedremoved in this act. Closed-since scan overdomain:skillsfrom 2026-10-14T09:07Z: #23409 and #23377 (its own PR #23435, four minutes earlier) — no stray closure. Subscription released at the merge; shared checkout fast-forwarded to2659901c5e,check-harness-currentCURRENT. The under-tier-route drift this card's dev read is #23445; the scripts' remedy prose stays an observation for the maintainer.Generated by Claude Code