[PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 os-warren · 第 38 场 session_013UzShSJnH3HuoZgVrYF9i8 并行在席 · 第 37 场(os-zhuang)、第 39–41 场(os-steve)、第 42 场(os-sales)与第 43 场(os-zhuang)已收班 · 台账在评论 #12708

Activity

1. os-litant

   self-assigned this

   on Aug 27, 2026
2. os-litant

   added

   pm:seatPM seat registry issue - single-writer body, index = this labelPM seat registry issue - single-writer body, index = this label

   on Aug 27, 2026
3. hotlong commented on Aug 30, 2026

   

   hotlong

   on Aug 30, 2026

   Contributor

   More actions

   Seat takeover audit: session local_c32e5a25-0581-4665-952f-60c1be74b250 assumes the director seat for session 4 (maintainer summon in-session: "处理 needs contract reviews", 2026-08-30T04:5xZ). Fuse machine-read: claude-fable-5 = CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER. Scope this session: needs:contract-review backstop over the 6 objectstack draft PRs + paired cards; objectui #6121/#6124 excluded (fresh triage-queue cards, no reviewable increment; triage timed round owns them). Prior seat (os-litant, session 3) closed its adjudication run 2026-08-29; its in-flight items are carried in the ledger.
4. zhuangjianguo commented on Aug 30, 2026

   

   zhuangjianguo

   on Aug 30, 2026 – with Claude

   Collaborator

   More actions

   Round-start marker — director seat, summon #5.
   Session: session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m
   Fire: 2026-08-30T10:45Z, maintainer summon via /pm-dispatch director ("总监处理决策卡").
   Predecessor's close-out briefing (2026-08-30T10:06Z, "收班") stands — seat explicitly released; explicit maintainer summon arbitrates, seat taken.
   Tier fuse (machine-read): get_session → last_served_model = claude-fable-5 = CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER → all four duties active this summon.
   Scope: decision inbox (objectstack 24 + objectui 12 open needs-user-decision cards), pm:awaiting-maintainer ledger (10), governed-merge audit window from the recorded anchor. needs:contract-review carrier #12009 is left to the triage timed round per the anti-double-run fence (backstop only if found stalled).

   ---

   Generated by Claude Code
5. zhuangjianguo

   changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 os-litant (session_016SG9S6V15MqeAgkehDcTwk) · 第 3 场决裁毕(58 张,双仓清零) · 在飞:2 PR + 1 dev[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场决裁中(决策箱 36:os 24 + ui 12)[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
6. zhuangjianguo

   changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场决裁中(决策箱 36:os 24 + ui 12)[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 一类自裁 6 毕 · 呈裁批 #1/6 已呈(决策箱余 30)[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
7. zhuangjianguo

   changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 一类自裁 6 毕 · 呈裁批 #1/6 已呈(决策箱余 30)[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 11 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1 裁 5)· 决策箱余 25 · 呈裁批 #2 拟[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
8. zhuangjianguo

   changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 11 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1 裁 5)· 决策箱余 25 · 呈裁批 #2 拟[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 16 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1/#2 裁 10)· 决策箱余 20[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
9. zhuangjianguo

   changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 16 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1/#2 裁 10)· 决策箱余 20[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 21 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1–#3 裁 15)· 决策箱余 15[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
10. zhuangjianguo

    changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 21 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1–#3 裁 15)· 决策箱余 15[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 26 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1–#4 裁 20)· 决策箱余 10[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
11. zhuangjianguo

    changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 26 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1–#4 裁 20)· 决策箱余 10[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 31 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1–#5 裁 25)· 决策箱余 5(末批呈)[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
12. zhuangjianguo

    changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 31 卡处置毕(自裁 6 + 批 #1–#5 裁 25)· 决策箱余 5(末批呈)[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 决策箱清零(自裁 7 + 批 #1–#9 裁 40)· 复审链 5 PASS + 1 FAIL 交接[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
13. zhuangjianguo

    changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 决策箱清零(自裁 7 + 批 #1–#9 裁 40)· 复审链 5 PASS + 1 FAIL 交接[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 决策箱清零(自裁 7 + 批 #1–#9 裁 44)· 复审 6 PASS 全 MERGED · 直派 3 PR 全 MERGED[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
14. zhuangjianguo

    changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5 场 · 决策箱清零(自裁 7 + 批 #1–#9 裁 44)· 复审 6 PASS 全 MERGED · 直派 3 PR 全 MERGED[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5-6 场 · 批 #1–#10 裁 49 + 自裁 7 · 复审 8 PASS · 批 #11 已呈[/+] on Aug 31, 2026
15. zhuangjianguo

    changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5-6 场 · 批 #1–#10 裁 49 + 自裁 7 · 复审 8 PASS · 批 #11 已呈[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 session_01DxbNgzPMo4YuRBmGmCQp9m · 第 5-6 场 · 批 #1–#11 裁 50 + 自裁 7 · 批 #11 余四张维护者自留[/+] on Aug 31, 2026
16. 746 remaining items

    Load more

    Load more actions
17. objectstack-fleet

    changed the title [-][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 os-warren · 第 38 场 session_013UzShSJnH3HuoZgVrYF9i8 并行在席 · 第 37 场(os-zhuang)、第 39–41 场(os-steve)与第 42 场(os-sales)已收班 · 台账在评论[/-] [+][PM seat] director(项目总监) — 🟢 os-warren · 第 38 场 session_013UzShSJnH3HuoZgVrYF9i8 并行在席 · 第 37 场(os-zhuang)、第 39–41 场(os-steve)、第 42 场(os-sales)与第 43 场(os-zhuang)已收班 · 台账在评论[/+] on Oct 16, 2026
18. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 16, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #43, continuation 1 — opening marker, director seat, session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax, 2026-10-16T10:46Z. Re-summoned by the maintainer's 「总监决裁」 in this session's chat after the closing brief (6212335085). Concurrent-summons rule: no takeover, no handover; this continuation keeps the global series, first batch #355 (no Ruling: line newer than batch #354's four on the four boards).

    • Identity and tier. Unchanged: GET /user os-zhuang (in GOVERNED_APPROVERS; no review, no click; writes as objectstack-fleet[bot] through the relay, read back); get_session in this act: last_served_model = configured_model = claude-fable-5-1 = CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER; rate_limit_info.status allowed_warning (seven-day); permission_mode auto.
    • Harness reading. check-harness-current.mjs: STALE — 3 harness-loaded files on origin/main (7a6ba03109 at this read) are not in the shared HEAD 3fed1eb00a: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md, references/execution-duties.md, references/triage-duties.md (PR docs(pm-dispatch): let an execution seat accept a filer-labelled card when the lane fits the domain table and the body passes the filing gate; triage spot-checks after #23751, landed 2026-10-16T09:47Z as Tier S on an in-seat record). Per the rule: noted here, no batch interrupted; the diff was read from origin/main in this act: a second exception to 「domain:* 只由分诊席产出」 — a filer-labelled card whose lane fits the domain table and whose body passes the filing gate's three items is claimable by the execution seat, with triage spot-checking afterwards; the Unlock-action: spelling line and one dev-budget line left SKILL.md / execution-duties; nothing in the director's duties changed. The next summon starts in a fresh session.
    • Inbox reading (objectstack, objectui, cloud, hotcrm). needs-user-decision issues: objectstack 1 — [Decision] The ownership ceremony classes the 8 shipped permission sets an old seeder stored as managed_by='admin' as authored and says to rename them: mirror them, keep blocking with the true remedy, or ask per row? #23873 (filed 2026-10-16T10:31Z from a side session of the maintainer's local hotcrm upgrade; no lane label and no triage intake at this read; the face is complete: six items, four facets, prior rulings, after-the-ruling) · objectui 0 · cloud 0 · hotcrm 0. Open draft PRs carrying the label: objectstack ci(spec-shape-gate): the workflow header says objectui deleted its copy and names the commit that last has it #23823 (Tier H by .github/workflows/spec-shape-gate.yml, comment-only +9/−7; domain:spec seat 1's ACCEPT 6209779754 with the 速读 in the body; review requested from both approvers; CI 31 success / 19 skipped; no ## Contract review record on the PR) and docs: guest has no bind door until ADR-0138 D3 item 5's door is built (ADR-0090 D9 line, two docblocks) #23780 (Tier H by docs/adr/** ×2 plus comment-only edits in packages/lint and packages/spec, +17/−14; ACCEPT 6206819721 with the 速读 in the body; both approvers requested; CI 38 success / 14 skipped; no ## Contract review record) · objectui 0 · cloud 0 · hotcrm 0. PR fix(release): refuse a Version Packages PR whose queue build lands behind main; mark next.2's 11 missed changesets #23833 (the 43rd summon's withdrawn PR line) and docs(skills): objectstack-api stops teaching an app to mount routes on http.server (#23787) #23807 both merged at 2026-10-16T09:40Z. Class-1 self-rulings: 0. ⇒ Batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #355 = [Decision] The ownership ceremony classes the 8 shipped permission sets an old seeder stored as managed_by='admin' as authored and says to rename them: mirror them, keep blocking with the true remedy, or ask per row? #23873 (item 1), delta on the card in this act; the PR lines = ci(spec-shape-gate): the workflow header says objectui deleted its copy and names the commit that last has it #23823 and docs: guest has no bind door until ADR-0138 D3 item 5's door is built (ADR-0090 D9 line, two docblocks) #23780 (one line each: approve or not; the lane's at-tier record is owed before either lands).
    • Duty one, the audit, run in this act (--since-ref objectstack=3fed1eb00af6 --since-ref objectui=726d8c9fcf5f --since-ref hotcrm=e50d048b9146, exit 0, 3 of 3 audited; cloud --since-ref cloud=837e24a4b8b4, 1 of 1): 3 governed merges, 0 oversized, 0 recognition rows. objectstack docs(pm-dispatch): let an execution seat accept a filer-labelled card when the lane fits the domain table and the body passes the filing gate; triage spot-checks after #23751 (.claude/** ×3, Tier S, objectstack-fleet[bot] on in-seat record 6205062630 PASS at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER), docs(os-dev): run the scoped platform-checklist check before push on an exported-symbol rename or removal #23766 (.claude/agents/os-dev.md + scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs, Tier S, record 6205619558 PASS), docs(skills): objectstack-api stops teaching an app to mount routes on http.server (#23787) #23807 (docs/adr/** + skills/** ×2, fleet bot on os-zhuang's APPROVED 5542940388 and record 6207942851 PASS — the authorised landing whose labels this summon cleared). objectui 0 · hotcrm 0 · cloud 0. Next round, exactly: --since-ref objectstack=7a6ba03109db --since-ref objectui=8a8bcf3dde5e --since-ref hotcrm=4f82b8152805 --since-ref cloud=58a0216b7349.
    • Duty three, pm:awaiting-maintainer. cloud feat(approvals): SLA escalateTo resolves positions via sys_user_position (ADR-0090 D3 follow-up) #2767 — exit taken in this act: hotlong posted both Workers' OS_STORAGE_* / OS_S3_* secret names at 6212040326 (2026-10-16T09:05Z; no partial OS_STORAGE_S3_* set on either plane), the Maintainer-action: line's 「done when」; the label leaves and pm:dispatched returns (assignee hotlong, PR feat(ui): position assignment panels as pure SDUI — Positions tab on sys_user, Holders/Permission Sets tabs on sys_position #2770 in flight) with an evidence comment; the repo:cloud#1 seat merges main into PR feat(ui): position assignment panels as pure SDUI — Positions tab on sys_user, Holders/Permission Sets tabs on sys_position #2770 and lands it. The other four unchanged, no exit: objectstack mcp distribution: verify the remote MCP + OAuth surface against ChatGPT connectors and Codex CLI, and submit the metadata-only registry listings — the remainder of #2714 #20791, hotcrm feat(app-showcase): re-instate grid KPIs, role-gated note, History tab #2066, cloud [11.0][A2] Remove dead author-facing metadata properties (ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove) #2377 (the week of day columns due from 2026-10-18), cloud chore: version packages #786.
    • Writes planned in this act: this marker; the delta on [Decision] The ownership ceremony classes the 8 shipped permission sets an old seeder stored as managed_by='admin' as authored and says to rename them: mirror them, keep blocking with the true remedy, or ask per row? #23873; the evidence comment and one label write on cloud feat(approvals): SLA escalateTo resolves positions via sys_user_position (ADR-0090 D3 follow-up) #2767 — all through the relay as objectstack-fleet[bot], each read back. No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched.
19. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 16, 2026

    Last edited by objectstack-fleet

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #43 continuation 1 ledger (block B · batch #355 answered: A taken on #23873 and recorded, the card converted into a cli execution card; the two PR lines answered 「同意」 and recorded on each PR, both already approved by the maintainer's own click; cloud #2767's exit taken; one reading gap recorded) — director seat, session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax, 2026-10-16T10:58Z

    • Batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #355, the maintainer's word 「同意」 in this session's chat:
      • [Decision] The ownership ceremony classes the 8 shipped permission sets an old seeder stored as managed_by='admin' as authored and says to rename them: mirror them, keep blocking with the true remedy, or ask per row? #23873 → A. Ruling 6213944432; body Ruled:; needs-user-decision → pm:queue with domain:cli and priority:p1 set in the same act (the lane fits the domain table and the body passes the filing gate; target:v18 and area:* are triage's on first touch). The legacy managed_by='admin' rows with a shipped name are ADR-0131 D10 fate-2 mirrors, listed in the reviewed plan with their differing fields; no restamp outside the ceremony; one cli PR, precedent PR fix(cli): the ownership ceremony names the uncomposed security plugin, never removal, for a shipped set or built-in position #23540.
      • PR ci(spec-shape-gate): the workflow header says objectui deleted its copy and names the commit that last has it #23823 → 「同意」 recorded at 6213971697 (correction 6214072260); PR docs: guest has no bind door until ADR-0138 D3 item 5's door is built (ADR-0090 D9 line, two docblocks) #23780 → 「同意」 recorded at 6213978398 (correction 6214081574). os-zhuang had APPROVED both at 2026-10-16T10:50Z, before the records were written; the labels had left and both were ready. PR ci(spec-shape-gate): the workflow header says objectui deleted its copy and names the commit that last has it #23823: ready, auto-merge not armed, head 898d29727588. PR docs: guest has no bind door until ADR-0138 D3 item 5's door is built (ADR-0090 D9 line, two docblocks) #23780: ready, auto-merge not armed, head 781bb576e245. The at-tier ## Contract review record and the landing are the domain:spec seat 1's.
    • Reading gap 2 of this summon (recorded, no incident filed): the two PR records say 「none at this read」 about the approval; the seat's script posted pre-drafted text after a freshness read that already showed the approvals. Corrected on both PRs in the same act. With gap 1 (the withdrawn PR line of batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #354), the pattern is the same: a PR's thread and reviews must be re-read at the moment of writing, not at the moment of drafting.
    • Duty three: cloud feat(approvals): SLA escalateTo resolves positions via sys_user_position (ADR-0090 D3 follow-up) #2767 exit taken (6213814795; pm:awaiting-maintainer → pm:dispatched, PR feat(ui): position assignment panels as pure SDUI — Positions tab on sys_user, Holders/Permission Sets tabs on sys_position #2770 the in-flight work, the repo:cloud#1 seat lands it after merging main). The other four unchanged (objectstack mcp distribution: verify the remote MCP + OAuth surface against ChatGPT connectors and Codex CLI, and submit the metadata-only registry listings — the remainder of #2714 #20791, hotcrm feat(app-showcase): re-instate grid KPIs, role-gated note, History tab #2066, cloud [11.0][A2] Remove dead author-facing metadata properties (ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove) #2377, cloud chore: version packages #786).
    • Duty one: 3 governed merges in the window, each with an in-seat at-tier record or an authorised approval; 0 recognition rows (opening marker 6213799892). Next anchors objectstack=7a6ba03109db objectui=8a8bcf3dde5e hotcrm=4f82b8152805 cloud=58a0216b7349.
    • Writes in this continuation so far: 9 comments, 1 body rewrite, 2 label writes — all through the relay as objectstack-fleet[bot], read back identical. No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched.
    • Inbox after the batch, re-read in this act: objectstack issues 0 · labelled PRs 0; objectui 0 · 0; cloud 0 · 0; hotcrm 0 · 0. No batch to compose; the closing brief follows.
20. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 16, 2026

    Last edited by objectstack-fleet

    Contributor

    More actions

    收班简报 · 第 43 场续场 1 · director seat session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax（os-zhuang），2026-10-16T10:59Z

    维护者原话「总监决裁」（续场）与「同意」（批 #355）；决策箱清零（四仓 issue 0、带标签 draft PR 0），收班。清单逐步：

    1. 新派发：无（章程：无子代理、无 Routine、不派 dev）。
    2. 在手工件：零认领（本续场无 Claim:；上场 check-handover.mjs 读 clear，本续场未新增认领）。
    3. 本续场裁决：批 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #355 = [Decision] The ownership ceremony classes the 8 shipped permission sets an old seeder stored as managed_by='admin' as authored and says to rename them: mirror them, keep blocking with the true remedy, or ask per row? #23873 → A（6213944432；needs-user-decision → pm:queue，同笔挂 domain:cli p1；target:v18 / area:* 归分诊首触）。PR 行 ci(spec-shape-gate): the workflow header says objectui deleted its copy and names the commit that last has it #23823、docs: guest has no bind door until ADR-0138 D3 item 5's door is built (ADR-0090 D9 line, two docblocks) #23780 → 「同意」（6213971697、6213978398，更正 6214072260、6214081574）；os-zhuang 已于 10:50Z 亲批两 PR，标签已离、已 ready，至档记录与落地归 spec 席 1。
    4. 读数缺口 2：两 PR 记录写「none at this read」时批准已在案（脚本按预稿写入，未按鲜度读数改文）；已在两 PR 各补一条更正，块 B 已记。与缺口 1 同类：写入那一刻须重读线程与 review，不以起草时刻为准。
    5. 职责三：cloud#2767 出口已取（6213814795，pm:awaiting-maintainer → pm:dispatched，PR feat(ui): position assignment panels as pure SDUI — Positions tab on sys_user, Holders/Permission Sets tabs on sys_position #2770 由 cloud 席合 main 后落地）；objectstack#20791、hotcrm#2066、cloud#2377、cloud#786 不变。
    6. 审计：窗口 3 笔受管合并（docs(pm-dispatch): let an execution seat accept a filer-labelled card when the lane fits the domain table and the body passes the filing gate; triage spot-checks after #23751、docs(os-dev): run the scoped platform-checklist check before push on an exported-symbol rename or removal #23766 Tier S 席内记录；docs(skills): objectstack-api stops teaching an app to mount routes on http.server (#23787) #23807 授权落地），0 超线、0 待认；下轮锚 objectstack=7a6ba03109db objectui=8a8bcf3dde5e hotcrm=4f82b8152805 cloud=58a0216b7349，已写正文说明段。
    7. harness：STALE（PR docs(pm-dispatch): let an execution seat accept a filer-labelled card when the lane fits the domain table and the body passes the filing gate; triage spot-checks after #23751 改 SKILL.md、execution-duties.md、triage-duties.md；本续场已从 origin/main 读 diff，对本席职责无变动）；下一场开新会话。
    8. 贴正文已刷新（当前 PM 段续场句、状态块、审计锚、接手指引），标题不变（第 43 场已在标题）。
    9. 定时器：无本场条目。
    10. 接任指引：新会话 /pm-dispatch director，先读本贴与第 43 场开轮标记 6211476523、续场开轮 6213799892、块 B 6214015133 与本简报；维护者「继续决裁」即续场。
21. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 16, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #43 continuation 1 (block C · after the closing brief: the two PR corrections posted, and the garbled fields of block B and the brief repaired in place) — director seat, session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax, 2026-10-16T11:04Z

    • The two PR corrections (reading gap 2, the 「none at this read」 wording while os-zhuang's approvals were already in place): the first attempt was refused by the stamp contract (a bare approval time beside the act's own stamp in the drafted text), and the seat's chain did not stop on that refusal — the refusal text was captured where the comment ids should have gone, so block B (6214015133) and the closing brief (6214025391) were posted with that text inside their 「correction」 fields. Posted now with the time declared as a reading: PR ci(spec-shape-gate): the workflow header says objectui deleted its copy and names the commit that last has it #23823 → 6214072260, PR docs: guest has no bind door until ADR-0138 D3 item 5's door is built (ADR-0090 D9 line, two docblocks) #23780 → 6214081574.
    • Repair in place: the garbled fields of 6214015133 and 6214025391 were replaced with those two ids through the relay's comment_edit op, each body read back identical to what was sent; nothing else in either comment changed (their stamps are the original ones).
    • Reading gap 3, for this seat's own scripts, not a card: a write step that exits inside a command substitution does not abort the chain; the next continuation captures ids from the tool's output file and checks the exit code outside the substitution before any dependent write.
    • Nothing else moved: the box is still empty (four repositories, 0 issues, 0 labelled PRs at the brief's read); the brief's checklist and handover guidance stand. The maintainer's next word brings the seat back, in a fresh session (harness STALE).
22. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 16, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #43, continuation 2 — opening marker, director seat, session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax, 2026-10-16T12:46Z. Re-summoned by the maintainer's 「继续决裁」 in this session's chat after continuation 1's closing brief (6214025391) and block C (6214116772). Concurrent-summons rule: no takeover, no handover; this continuation keeps the global series, first batch #356 (no Ruling: line newer than batch #355's on the four boards).

    • Identity and tier. Unchanged: GET /user os-zhuang (in GOVERNED_APPROVERS; no review, no click; writes as objectstack-fleet[bot] through the relay, read back); get_session in this act: last_served_model = configured_model = claude-fable-5-1 = CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER; rate_limit_info.status allowed_warning (seven-day); permission_mode auto.
    • Harness reading. check-harness-current.mjs: STALE, the same three files as continuation 1 (PR docs(pm-dispatch): let an execution seat accept a filer-labelled card when the lane fits the domain table and the body passes the filing gate; triage spot-checks after #23751); their diff was read from origin/main then and nothing in the director's duties changed. No batch interrupted; the next summon starts in a fresh session.
    • Inbox reading (objectstack, objectui, cloud, hotcrm). needs-user-decision issues: objectstack 2 — [Decision] The metadata save door silently rewrites a retired flow spelling (ADR-0087, 2026-08-02) while #23543's ruling says every authoring door refuses it: keep healing, refuse only new legacy, or heal on read and refuse at save? #23903 (filed 2026-10-16T12:18Z by the domain:spec seat 1: the flow save door's retired spellings; it does not cite [Decision] The metadata save door lifts a retired flow spelling on a NEW flow and stores it, where every other authoring door refuses it — refuse on a new flow, or keep the door a rehydration seam? #23775, whose ruling 6212082860 of 2026-10-16T09:08Z already decided its A and B — read as a fork of that ruling) and [Decision] Setup's "Packages" and "Installed Apps" disagree about what is installed: one list with a plugin-owned marketplace door, one list replacing both, or two labelled lists? (item 2 of #23803) #23892 (filed 2026-10-16T11:38Z by the domain:engine seat 2, item 2 of Setup navigation: one audit entry, Packages and Installed Apps agree, User Preferences and Identity Links leave the main nav #23803: Setup's "Packages" and "Installed Apps") · objectui 0 · cloud 0 · hotcrm 0. Open PRs carrying the label, objectstack 4: feat(cli,runtime): os dev upgrades a v17-shape development database in place; the ownership ceremony covers the telemetry sibling and adopts legacy shipped-set seeds (ADR-0131) #23906 (ready, Tier H by docs/adr/0131, +1514/−86, Fixes #23871 #23872 #23873; 速读 + 席位核对 6215647152; os-zhuang requested, hotlong the author; CI still running at this read; no ## Contract review record yet), feat(metadata-protocol)!: the flow save door refuses a retired spelling on a NEW flow; a stored flow keeps the full chain #23902 (draft, Tier H by docs/adr/0087, +692/−57, Fixes #23775, the execution of batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #354 item 1's letter B; record 6215619986 PASS at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER; 速读终稿 + ACCEPT 6215638408; both approvers requested; one Test Core shard running), docs(qa): author the v18 line's capabilities into the platform checklist (48 since:v18 items) #23901 (draft, +3,535/−0 over the 3,000 line, docs/qa only, Fixes #23879; 速读 + ACCEPT 6215561472; both requested; CI green; main red on hourly full run: red on main (CI) #23885 so the lane lands only after main is green), docs(adr-0131): amend D5 — under a walled posture, deployment-level acceptance of package defaults is host configuration #23883 (draft, Tier H by docs/adr/0131 one line, Fixes #23385; record 6215582328 PASS; ACCEPT 6215621313; both requested; the one Check Changeset red is the pre-label run, the post-label run is skipped) · objectui 0 · cloud 0 · hotcrm 0. Class-1 self-rulings: 0 (the [Decision] The metadata save door silently rewrites a retired flow spelling (ADR-0087, 2026-08-02) while #23543's ruling says every authoring door refuses it: keep healing, refuse only new legacy, or heal on read and refuse at save? #23903 fork is put to the maintainer, since its new sub-question narrows the save door's accept set for existing rows). ⇒ Batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #356 = [Decision] The metadata save door silently rewrites a retired flow spelling (ADR-0087, 2026-08-02) while #23543's ruling says every authoring door refuses it: keep healing, refuse only new legacy, or heal on read and refuse at save? #23903 (item 1), [Decision] Setup's "Packages" and "Installed Apps" disagree about what is installed: one list with a plugin-owned marketplace door, one list replacing both, or two labelled lists? (item 2 of #23803) #23892 (item 2), deltas on the cards in this act; the PR lines = feat(cli,runtime): os dev upgrades a v17-shape development database in place; the ownership ceremony covers the telemetry sibling and adopts legacy shipped-set seeds (ADR-0131) #23906, feat(metadata-protocol)!: the flow save door refuses a retired spelling on a NEW flow; a stored flow keeps the full chain #23902, docs(qa): author the v18 line's capabilities into the platform checklist (48 since:v18 items) #23901, docs(adr-0131): amend D5 — under a walled posture, deployment-level acceptance of package defaults is host configuration #23883.
    • Duty one, the audit, run in this act (--since-ref objectstack=7a6ba03109db --since-ref objectui=8a8bcf3dde5e --since-ref hotcrm=4f82b8152805, exit 0, 3 of 3; cloud --since-ref cloud=58a0216b7349, 1 of 1): 5 governed merges, 0 oversized. With an at-tier PASS record: docs(adr-0069): record ruling C′'s enforcement and the API-key admission seam #23875 (docs/adr/0069, os-zhuang, PASS 6214838689 after a FAIL), ci(spec-shape-gate): the workflow header says objectui deleted its copy and names the commit that last has it #23823 (PASS 6214160554, written after the approval), feat(spec)!: retire the view form's visibleOn and the page component's visibility as keys; their ADR-0089 renames leave the load path (F4 of #23543) #23836 (skills/**, os-zhuang, +1,197/−679, PASS 6212287597 after a FAIL), docs(os-dev): admit the ruled ceiling raise in the ratchet block and point at the ratchet header #23868 (.claude/**, Tier S, fleet bot on PASS 6213448127). Recognition row, 1: docs: guest has no bind door until ADR-0138 D3 item 5's door is built (ADR-0090 D9 line, two docblocks) #23780 (docs/adr/** ×2 + comment-only edits in packages/lint and packages/spec), os-zhuang approved 2026-10-16T10:47Z and merged 2026-10-16T11:20Z with record 6214176883 standing at FAIL on ② (every ① judgment RIGHT; the FAIL is the skip-changeset call: the changed position.zod.ts docblock ships in @objectstack/spec's dist/*.d.ts, so a patch changeset was owed) and no PASS after it. Put to the maintainer in this continuation's chat: recognise, and say whether a one-file follow-up changeset is wanted. objectui 0 · hotcrm 0 · cloud 0. Next round, exactly: --since-ref objectstack=d5666be8769a --since-ref objectui=f78efdd1e3eb --since-ref hotcrm=4f82b8152805 --since-ref cloud=4c8e2df9a87a.
    • Duty three, pm:awaiting-maintainer. cloud feat(approvals): SLA escalateTo resolves positions via sys_user_position (ADR-0090 D3 follow-up) #2767 re-entered the state at 2026-10-16T12:00Z after PR feat(ui): position assignment panels as pure SDUI — Positions tab on sys_user, Holders/Permission Sets tabs on sys_position #2770 landed (4c8e2df9): the new Maintainer-action: line is the maintainer's secret bulk of PR feat(ui): position assignment panels as pure SDUI — Positions tab on sys_user, Holders/Permission Sets tabs on sys_position #2770's seven rows on objectos-staging then objectos after each plane's deploy, plus a redeploy; no evidence yet, no exit. The other four unchanged (objectstack mcp distribution: verify the remote MCP + OAuth surface against ChatGPT connectors and Codex CLI, and submit the metadata-only registry listings — the remainder of #2714 #20791, hotcrm feat(app-showcase): re-instate grid KPIs, role-gated note, History tab #2066, cloud [11.0][A2] Remove dead author-facing metadata properties (ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove) #2377, cloud chore: version packages #786).
    • From the earlier batches: [Decision] The ownership ceremony classes the 8 shipped permission sets an old seeder stored as managed_by='admin' as authored and says to rename them: mirror them, keep blocking with the true remedy, or ask per row? #23873 (batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #355 letter A) is pm:dispatched to the cli lane (hotlong), executed by PR feat(cli,runtime): os dev upgrades a v17-shape development database in place; the ownership ceremony covers the telemetry sibling and adopts legacy shipped-set seeds (ADR-0131) #23906 above, and triage added target:v18 and area:access; ADR-0139 E7 (comments): sys_comment gains a writer-stamped object_name + record_id pair with a backfill, and the comment-thread read gate emits one ReadableIds leaf per parent object over it (ruling on #23732, batch #354 item 2) #23857 (batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #354 item 2) is pm:dispatched to domain:services seat 2; PRs ci(spec-shape-gate): the workflow header says objectui deleted its copy and names the commit that last has it #23823 and docs: guest has no bind door until ADR-0138 D3 item 5's door is built (ADR-0090 D9 line, two docblocks) #23780 merged by the maintainer's hand.
    • Writes planned in this act: this marker; deltas on [Decision] The metadata save door silently rewrites a retired flow spelling (ADR-0087, 2026-08-02) while #23543's ruling says every authoring door refuses it: keep healing, refuse only new legacy, or heal on read and refuse at save? #23903 and [Decision] Setup's "Packages" and "Installed Apps" disagree about what is installed: one list with a plugin-owned marketplace door, one list replacing both, or two labelled lists? (item 2 of #23803) #23892 — through the relay as objectstack-fleet[bot], read back. No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched.
23. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 16, 2026

    Last edited by objectstack-fleet

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #43 continuation 2 ledger (block B · batch #356 answered 「同意」: two rulings recorded, three execution cards filed, one decision card closed; the four PR lines were already approved by the maintainer's own click and the word is recorded on each; the #23780 row recognised and its follow-up filed) — director seat, session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax, 2026-10-16T13:21Z

    • Batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #356, the maintainer's word 「同意」 in this session's chat:
      • [Decision] The metadata save door silently rewrites a retired flow spelling (ADR-0087, 2026-08-02) while #23543's ruling says every authoring door refuses it: keep healing, refuse only new legacy, or heal on read and refuse at save? #23903 → B′ (i) yes · C (ii) no. Ruling 6216220018; body Ruled: + Blocked-by: #23775; needs-user-decision → pm:blocked with domain:engine and priority:p2 in the same act. A retired spelling a re-save NEWLY INTRODUCES on a stored flow is refused like a new flow's (a conversion-hit diff against the stored row), as a follow-up PR extending PR feat(metadata-protocol)!: the flow save door refuses a retired spelling on a NEW flow; a stored flow keeps the full chain #23902's predicate after it lands; read-time canonicalization is not taken. Pointer on [Decision] The metadata save door lifts a retired flow spelling on a NEW flow and stores it, where every other authoring door refuses it — refuse on a new flow, or keep the door a rehydration seam? #23775: 6216252315.
      • [Decision] Setup's "Packages" and "Installed Apps" disagree about what is installed: one list with a plugin-owned marketplace door, one list replacing both, or two labelled lists? (item 2 of #23803) #23892 → B. Ruling 6216295104; body Ruled:; execution cards filed: Setup Packages is the one list of what is installed: Source column, marketplace row actions, and the "Installed Apps" entry opens Packages filtered to Source = marketplace (ruling B, objectstack-ai/objectstack#23892) objectui#12675 (domain:ui, p2, pm:queue: the Source column, the marketplace row actions, the Source = marketplace filter preset, the Installed Apps view retired) and cloud-connection: the "Installed Apps" entry opens Setup Packages filtered to Source = marketplace (ruling B on #23892; after the objectui card lands and the pin moves) #23933 (domain:cli, p2, pm:blocked, Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectui#12675: the cloud-connection entry's target); the decision card closed completed with its label removed (close-cards --stateless). Setup navigation: one audit entry, Packages and Installed Apps agree, User Preferences and Identity Links leave the main nav #23803 keeps items 3 and 4.
      • PR lines feat(cli,runtime): os dev upgrades a v17-shape development database in place; the ownership ceremony covers the telemetry sibling and adopts legacy shipped-set seeds (ADR-0131) #23906, feat(metadata-protocol)!: the flow save door refuses a retired spelling on a NEW flow; a stored flow keeps the full chain #23902, docs(qa): author the v18 line's capabilities into the platform checklist (48 since:v18 items) #23901, docs(adr-0131): amend D5 — under a walled posture, deployment-level acceptance of package defaults is host configuration #23883 → 「同意」. os-zhuang had APPROVED all four at 2026-10-16T12:45Z–2026-10-16T12:52Z, while the batch was being presented, and the lanes had already cleared needs-user-decision; the word is recorded on each PR with the approval read at the write (6216368586, 6216379905, 6216387551, 6216397089). One wording slip, noted rather than re-posted: each record's approval sentence says this seat clears the label 「in this act」, and there was nothing left to clear. States at this block: feat(cli,runtime): os dev upgrades a v17-shape development database in place; the ownership ceremony covers the telemetry sibling and adopts legacy shipped-set seeds (ADR-0131) #23906 merged; feat(metadata-protocol)!: the flow save door refuses a retired spelling on a NEW flow; a stored flow keeps the full chain #23902 merged; docs(qa): author the v18 line's capabilities into the platform checklist (48 since:v18 items) #23901 merged; docs(adr-0131): amend D5 — under a walled posture, deployment-level acceptance of package defaults is host configuration #23883 merged; The landings are the lanes': feat(cli,runtime): os dev upgrades a v17-shape development database in place; the ownership ceremony covers the telemetry sibling and adopts legacy shipped-set seeds (ADR-0131) #23906 still owes the at-tier ## Contract review record and green CI; feat(metadata-protocol)!: the flow save door refuses a retired spelling on a NEW flow; a stored flow keeps the full chain #23902 the engine seat's after CI; docs(qa): author the v18 line's capabilities into the platform checklist (48 since:v18 items) #23901 after main is green (hourly full run: red on main (CI) #23885); docs(adr-0131): amend D5 — under a walled posture, deployment-level acceptance of package defaults is host configuration #23883 the spec seat's.
    • Duty one, recognition: docs: guest has no bind door until ADR-0138 D3 item 5's door is built (ADR-0090 D9 line, two docblocks) #23780's FAIL-record merge recognised on 「同意」; the one-file changeset follow-up is Add the @objectstack/spec patch changeset PR #23780 owed: its position.zod.ts anchor docblock ships in dist/*.d.ts (contract review 6214176883 FAIL on the changeset; merged by the maintainer, follow-up recognised) #23935 (domain:spec, p3, pm:queue), noted on the PR at 6216348443. The other four rows of the window carry PASS records.
    • Duty three: cloud feat(approvals): SLA escalateTo resolves positions via sys_user_position (ADR-0090 D3 follow-up) #2767 re-entered pm:awaiting-maintainer for step (c) (the maintainer's secret bulk on both objectos planes after the deploy); no exit yet. The other four unchanged.
    • Harness: STALE (PR docs(pm-dispatch): let an execution seat accept a filer-labelled card when the lane fits the domain table and the body passes the filing gate; triage spot-checks after #23751's three files); the next summon starts in a fresh session.
    • Writes in this continuation so far: 11 comments, 3 body rewrites, 3 label writes, 3 issue creates, 1 close — all through the relay as objectstack-fleet[bot], read back identical; one relay refusal with zero writes (a 290-byte title over the 256 cap, retried shorter).
    • Inbox after the batch, re-read in this act: objectstack issues 0 · labelled PRs 0; objectui issues 2 ([finding] os dev --port is unvalidated and os start --port is unbounded — both forward to the serve child on a channel that renames the operator's input #12673 docs(spec): wrong-layer guidance for group/hideFields/rowColor on object userActions #12606) · labelled PRs 0; cloud issues 0 · labelled PRs 0; hotcrm issues 0 · labelled PRs 0; Two objectui cards ([finding] os dev --port is unvalidated and os start --port is unbounded — both forward to the serve child on a channel that renames the operator's input #12673, docs(spec): wrong-layer guidance for group/hideFields/rowColor on object userActions #12606) are in the box, so a batch follows: Unified version bump to 0.5.0 #357, composed in block C. (This sentence read 「No batch to compose; the closing brief follows」 when first posted and was repaired in place through the relay once the read above was re-read; the stamp is the original.)
24. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 16, 2026

    Last edited by objectstack-fleet

    Contributor

    More actions

    收班简报 · 第 43 场续场 2 · director seat session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax（os-zhuang），2026-10-16T13:22Z

    维护者原话「继续决裁」（续场）与「同意」（批 #356）；决策箱复读显示 objectui 新到 2 张（objectstack issues 0 · labelled PRs 0; objectui issues 2 (#12673 #12606) · labelled PRs 0; cloud issues 0 · labelled PRs 0; hotcrm issues 0 · labelled PRs 0; ）；这两张在本简报写出时已在箱内，本续场因此未收班，批 #357 随块 C 呈。以下清单是到此刻的状态（本句经中继就地修正，印章为原值）：

    1. 新派发：无（章程：无子代理、无 Routine、不派 dev）。
    2. 在手工件：零认领（本续场无 Claim:）。
    3. 本续场裁决：批 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #356 = [Decision] The metadata save door silently rewrites a retired flow spelling (ADR-0087, 2026-08-02) while #23543's ruling says every authoring door refuses it: keep healing, refuse only new legacy, or heal on read and refuse at save? #23903 → B′(i) 是 / C(ii) 否（6216220018；pm:blocked on [Decision] The metadata save door lifts a retired flow spelling on a NEW flow and stores it, where every other authoring door refuses it — refuse on a new flow, or keep the door a rehydration seam? #23775，domain:engine p2）、[Decision] Setup's "Packages" and "Installed Apps" disagree about what is installed: one list with a plugin-owned marketplace door, one list replacing both, or two labelled lists? (item 2 of #23803) #23892 → B（6216295104；执行卡 objectui#12675 与 cloud-connection: the "Installed Apps" entry opens Setup Packages filtered to Source = marketplace (ruling B on #23892; after the objectui card lands and the pin moves) #23933，本卡关闭 completed）。PR 行 feat(cli,runtime): os dev upgrades a v17-shape development database in place; the ownership ceremony covers the telemetry sibling and adopts legacy shipped-set seeds (ADR-0131) #23906、feat(metadata-protocol)!: the flow save door refuses a retired spelling on a NEW flow; a stored flow keeps the full chain #23902、docs(qa): author the v18 line's capabilities into the platform checklist (48 since:v18 items) #23901、docs(adr-0131): amend D5 — under a walled posture, deployment-level acceptance of package defaults is host configuration #23883：os-zhuang 已于 12:45–12:52Z 亲批，回批原话记于各 PR（6216368586、6216379905、6216387551、6216397089），落地归各车道。
    4. 职责一：docs: guest has no bind door until ADR-0138 D3 item 5's door is built (ADR-0090 D9 line, two docblocks) #23780 以 FAIL 记录亲合一行经「同意」认定，跟进卡 Add the @objectstack/spec patch changeset PR #23780 owed: its position.zod.ts anchor docblock ships in dist/*.d.ts (contract review 6214176883 FAIL on the changeset; merged by the maintainer, follow-up recognised) #23935（spec，补 @objectstack/spec patch changeset），PR 注记 6216348443。
    5. 职责三：cloud#2767 为步骤 (c) 重新入待人工态，无出口；objectstack#20791、hotcrm#2066、cloud#2377、cloud#786 不变。
    6. 审计：窗口 5 笔，4 笔有 PASS 记录；下轮锚 objectstack=d5666be8769a objectui=f78efdd1e3eb hotcrm=4f82b8152805 cloud=4c8e2df9a87a，已写正文说明段。
    7. 读数缺口：本续场无新缺口；四条 PR 记录的「本席本次摘标」一句无标可摘（车道已先摘），记于块 B，不另发更正。
    8. harness：STALE（PR docs(pm-dispatch): let an execution seat accept a filer-labelled card when the lane fits the domain table and the body passes the filing gate; triage spot-checks after #23751 三文件，续场 1 已读 diff）；下一场开新会话。
    9. 贴正文已刷新（当前 PM 段续场 2 句、状态块、审计锚、接手指引），标题不变。
    10. 定时器：无本场条目。接任指引：新会话 /pm-dispatch director，先读本贴与第 43 场各台账块（续场 2：开轮 6215805629、块 B 6216431031 与本简报）；维护者「继续决裁」即续场。
25. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 16, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #43 continuation 2 (block C · the box was not empty: two objectui cards arrived during the batch; block B and the brief corrected in place; batch #357 composed; #15204's state read on the maintainer's question) — director seat, session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax, 2026-10-16T13:29Z

    • Correction. The inbox re-read inside block B (6216431031) returned objectui [finding] os dev --port is unvalidated and os start --port is unbounded — both forward to the serve child on a channel that renames the operator's input #12673 and docs(spec): wrong-layer guidance for group/hideFields/rowColor on object userActions #12606, and the block's last line and the closing brief (6216439353) still said 「no batch」 / 「清零」: a template sentence written before the read. Both comments are repaired in place through the relay's comment_edit (their stamps are the originals); this continuation does not close. Reading gap 4: a closing sentence must be conditional on the read it follows.
    • Batch Unified version bump to 0.5.0 #357 = objectui docs(spec): wrong-layer guidance for group/hideFields/rowColor on object userActions #12606 (item 1 — in flight; domain:ui seat 4's decision 6216244614 on PR [finding] os serve --port abc is never validated — parseInt yields NaN and the boot dies on a raw ERR_SOCKET_BAD_PORT #12662: hiding Display on Setup lists also hides Refresh and Export; the seat recommends B) and objectui [finding] os dev --port is unvalidated and os start --port is unbounded — both forward to the serve child on a channel that renames the operator's input #12673 (item 2 — the domain:ui seat's card: lookup and record-pointer cells in console lists are plain text; the seat recommends A). Deltas on the cards in this act. check-prior-rulings reads objectstack's corpus only; both cards grep'd their governing texts themselves and the director re-ran the premise greps on objectui origin/main f78efdd1e3.
    • refactor(plugin-security,platform-objects,spec): retire the catalog seeders, the per-organization catalog machinery and the four catalog objects; Setup creation is an environment write under single and refused under a wall (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D5/D13) #15204 (C3 of ADR-0131), read on the maintainer's 「15204 还没处理完吗」: open, pm:epic + pm:dispatched, the epic PM marchtian (session_01Rerax7QTjKMPCUZxQUtPFR; seat post [PM seat] domain:cli — 🟢 os-sales · session_01BVm1pAXVXQ3PjC42j1kPFf · serial, p1/p2 + #24022 (maintainer) #6024 touched 2026-10-16T12:58Z). Landed: stages 7a (2026-10-14T06:18Z) and 7b, 8-post (C3 #15204 stages 7a ∥ 7b → 8-post, build ahead: delete the permission-set projection and the position write-through that stage 8 leaves unreferenced, then the post-stage-8 catalog gates and residue #22975), C7b (feat(objectql,cli): inventory + migration — four fates per object, mirrors deleted only after the id→name rewrite is verified, per-table boot report (ADR-0131 D10) #15211, feat(metadata-core,metadata-protocol,runtime): #15211 S2+S5 — the sys_metadata family drops organization_id, and the v18 boot refusal lands with it (C7b, split for seat 1) #23429, feat(plugin-security,cli): #15211 S3 — retire sys_user_permission_set.permission_set_id and its indexes, delete the boot grant-name backfill, add the named-grant unique index (C7b, split for seat 1) #23430), the S8 fix (fix(plugin-security): an environment kernel's security catalog serves permission sets and positions saved through the metadata door again (S8 regression) #23308). Open: feat(core,objectql,plugin-security,plugin-sharing): the catalog is read from the registry; assignment tables reference it by name (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D4) #15196 (stage 9, the registry read and the seeders' retirement) — pm:epic, unassigned; objectui [Direction · v18] Per-user scope for view personal configuration (parked from #7494) #7611 (C9) pm:on-hold; and the ordering question relayed from the maintainer's hotcrm session at 6213772296 (2026-10-16T10:45Z) — the ceremony's verified marker versus stage 9, a cycle the stage-0 addendum places in the epic PM's hands, unanswered since. A pointer with this reading goes on refactor(plugin-security,platform-objects,spec): retire the catalog seeders, the per-organization catalog machinery and the four catalog objects; Setup creation is an environment write under single and refused under a wall (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D5/D13) #15204 in this act; the order call stays the epic PM's; no dev is dispatched from this seat.
26. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 16, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 16, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #43 continuation 2 (block D · the maintainer's 「总监裁顺序」: the #15204 ordering cycle ruled β as a class-1 ruling on the maintainer's order; stage 9 filed as its own epic card; batch #357 still awaiting the word) — director seat, session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax, 2026-10-16T13:40Z

    • refactor(plugin-security,platform-objects,spec): retire the catalog seeders, the per-organization catalog machinery and the four catalog objects; Setup creation is an environment write under single and refused under a wall (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D5/D13) #15204 → β (ruling 6216760903; body Ruled:; the stale header and the two closed Blocked-by: lines corrected in the same write; Blocked-by: #15196 stays). Stage 9 (declared sharing rules read from the registry, bootstrapDeclaredSharingRules retired, the declared-rule-mirrors deleted by the ceremony) goes first; the ceremony's verified marker follows it; D13/D14's zero-NULL gate is read as satisfied by a D10 report whose only remaining NULL rows are the charted mirrors. Not taken: a verified marker over NULL rows (α), attribution under single (γ, undone by the next boot's organization-less seed pass). Interim: dev databases boot via PR feat(cli,runtime): os dev upgrades a v17-shape development database in place; the ownership ceremony covers the telemetry sibling and adopts legacy shipped-set seeds (ADR-0131) #23906's path; --allow-destructive drops wait (fix(cli)!: os migrate apply --allow-destructive holds back every organization_id drop until the organization-ownership ceremony verifies (#23684) #23699).
    • Stage-9 card filed: C3 stage 9 (#15204): declared sharing rules read from the registry, bootstrapDeclaredSharingRules retires, and the ceremony deletes the declared-rule mirrors; the verified marker follows (director ordering ruling) #23952 (pm:epic, priority:p1, domain:services, Part of #15204), with the addendum's owed items (a) (b) (c) as its first measurements; the epic PM (marchtian) dispatches it; no dev from this seat.
    • Batch Unified version bump to 0.5.0 #357 (objectui docs(spec): wrong-layer guidance for group/hideFields/rowColor on object userActions #12606 → B recommended; objectui [finding] os dev --port is unvalidated and os start --port is unbounded — both forward to the serve child on a channel that renames the operator's input #12673 → A recommended) has no word yet; it stays open.
    • Writes in this act: 1 issue create, 1 ruling comment, 1 body rewrite, this block — all through the relay as objectstack-fleet[bot], read back identical.
27. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 17, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 17, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #43, continuation 3 — opening marker, director seat, session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax, 2026-10-17T01:05Z. Re-summoned by the maintainer's 「总监决裁」 in this session's chat after continuation 2's closing brief (6216439353), block C (6216570996) and block D (6216785797). Concurrent-summons rule: no takeover, no handover; this continuation keeps the global series, first batch #358 (batch #357 closed when the domain:ui seat ruled objectui#12606 by its own class-1 reading, 6217025861, and the card landed; no Ruling: line newer than that on the four boards).

    • Identity and tier. Unchanged: GET /user os-zhuang (in GOVERNED_APPROVERS; no review, no click; writes as objectstack-fleet[bot] through the relay, read back); get_session in this act: last_served_model = configured_model = claude-fable-5-1 = CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER; permission_mode auto.
    • Harness reading. check-harness-current.mjs: STALE, the same three files as continuations 1 and 2 (PR docs(pm-dispatch): let an execution seat accept a filer-labelled card when the lane fits the domain table and the body passes the filing gate; triage spot-checks after #23751); their diff was read from origin/main in continuation 1 and nothing in the director's duties changed. No batch interrupted; the next summon starts in a fresh session.
    • Inbox reading (objectstack, objectui, cloud, hotcrm), re-read at this write. needs-user-decision issues, 9: objectstack 3 — [Decision] #23217 cannot land as ruled: four of the five request-to-context doors cannot import an internal function of @objectstack/runtime. Home it in @objectstack/core (a new export), keep five copies under a parity pin, or close #23982 (filed 2026-10-16T15:39Z by the domain:cli seat 2 at the claim attempt on runtime: one internal request-to-ExecutionContext resolver for the platform's five hand-rolled copies (rest, runtime, service-settings, service-storage, plugin-hono-server) — not a published export (ruling C′ on #23128, p3) #23217: the ruled home of the one request-to-context resolver, @objectstack/runtime, is unreachable from four of the five doors), security: the 18 migration text says organization admins assign positions and permission sets to their members; the shipped organization_admin sets are read-only on both assignment objects and the server refuses #23960 (a finding from objectui domain:ui seat 3, triaged 2026-10-16T15:58Z target:v18 area:access: the 18 migration text promises organization-admin assignment the shipped sets refuse), [Decision] cloud#2910 (the organisation page): which of four framework widenings to build — an invite action on sys_organization, an action disabled-reason key, an "only owner" predicate root, a record-scoped leave confirm? #24034 (filed 2026-10-16T19:54Z by the triage seat: which of four framework widenings cloud#2910's organisation page gets) · objectui 1 — feat(spec,security): OrgScopingEntitlement grows platform-global exemption + unbounded-admin suppression, consumed by Layer 0 arming #12704 (decision record 6222913929 + correction 6222939154 by the domain:ui seat: metric tile height is the authored layout.h, not a platform constant) · cloud 5 — feat(spec,plugin-security): A5 — 包级 capability 声明 API (#2920) #2932 (p1, filed 2026-10-16T16:56Z by the repo:cloud#1 seat: where a blueprint view's filters / sort are declared, PR feat(lint): bidirectional binding-root check for visibility predicates (ADR-0089 D3b) #2931 in flight), chore: version packages #2935, feat(plugin-security): C2-β — explain 引擎 record 粒度行级归因 (#2920) #2939, fix(plugin-security): #2936 — RLS field-existence/tenancyDisabled 网识别 canonical == #2942, chore(release): 破坏性授权变更 changeset 提级 major + v15 升级指南 #2950 (p2–p3 console UX cards, not yet read by this seat) · hotcrm 0. Open PRs carrying the label, objectstack 2, both already approved by os-zhuang before this continuation opened: docs(adr): ADR-0078 and ADR-0087 note the conversion-conflict channel's retirement #24046 (Tier H docs/adr/**, +3/−0, approved 2026-10-17T00:29Z on head 6a38a41781; its ordering term, PR feat(spec)!: retire the ADR-0078 conversion-conflict channel — onConflict / reservedNodeTypes, the notice types, the conflicts arrays and the FLOW_CONVERSION_CONFLICT 409 #24045 merged first, was met at 2026-10-16T22:28Z) and ci(rerun-safety): a truthful verdict, passes bounded by the job's time, and a card on a red night #23975 (Tier H .github/workflows/** ×2, +876/−213, approved 2026-10-17T00:28Z on head 240a2a565c). Neither carries a ## Contract review record at this read. Class-1 self-rulings: 0. ⇒ Batch [WIP] Update action step configuration based on job run #358 = [Decision] #23217 cannot land as ruled: four of the five request-to-context doors cannot import an internal function of @objectstack/runtime. Home it in @objectstack/core (a new export), keep five copies under a parity pin, or close #23982 (item 1), security: the 18 migration text says organization admins assign positions and permission sets to their members; the shipped organization_admin sets are read-only on both assignment objects and the server refuses #23960 (item 2), [Decision] cloud#2910 (the organisation page): which of four framework widenings to build — an invite action on sys_organization, an action disabled-reason key, an "only owner" predicate root, a record-scoped leave confirm? #24034 (item 3), objectui#12704 (item 4), cloud#2932 (item 5), deltas on the cards in this act; batch Fix link checker CI by excluding Fumadocs framework patterns #359 = cloud chore: version packages #2935, feat(plugin-security): C2-β — explain 引擎 record 粒度行级归因 (#2920) #2939, fix(plugin-security): #2936 — RLS field-existence/tenancyDisabled 网识别 canonical == #2942, chore(release): 破坏性授权变更 changeset 提级 major + v15 升级指南 #2950, read after [WIP] Update action step configuration based on job run #358's word; the PR lines = docs(adr): ADR-0078 and ADR-0087 note the conversion-conflict channel's retirement #24046, ci(rerun-safety): a truthful verdict, passes bounded by the job's time, and a card on a red night #23975 (the word stands; this seat records it and clears the label in this act).
    • Duty one, the audit, run in this act (--since-ref objectstack=d5666be8769a --since-ref objectui=f78efdd1e3eb --since-ref hotcrm=4f82b8152805 --since-ref cloud=4c8e2df9a87a, exit 0): 7 governed merges on objectstack, 1 oversized; objectui 0, hotcrm 0, cloud 0. With an at-tier PASS record: docs(adr-0018): dated note — http_request, http_call and webhook are reserved retired node names (F5-http of #23543) #23955 (6217920402), chore(claude): allow the edit tools on the os-dev worktrees' .changeset/pre notes #23930 (Tier S .claude/**, 6216485881), docs(adr-0131): amend D5 — under a walled posture, deployment-level acceptance of package defaults is host configuration #23883, feat(metadata-protocol)!: the flow save door refuses a retired spelling on a NEW flow; a stored flow keeps the full chain #23902. Oversized human merge, 1: docs(qa): author the v18 line's capabilities into the platform checklist (48 since:v18 items) #23901 (+3,535 docs/qa only, merged by the maintainer's hand after main went green, as its line said). Recognition rows, 2: feat(scripts): check:pnpm-flag-spellings — no committed pnpm call spells -s, --prod=VALUE, --production=VALUE or --no-production, which a global pnpm 11+/12 frontend rejects #23824 (.github/workflows/**, os-zhuang approved and merged, no ## Contract review record at any tier) and feat(cli,runtime): os dev upgrades a v17-shape development database in place; the ownership ceremony covers the telemetry sibling and adopts legacy shipped-set seeds (ADR-0131) #23906 (docs/adr/0131, +1514/−86, Fixes #23871 #23872 #23873, os-zhuang approved and merged, no record). Both are put to the maintainer in this continuation's chat as 受管合并认定. Re-run at this write for objectui and cloud (--since-ref objectui=f3a7b870a117 --since-ref cloud=c78bcd4b1808, exit 0, 2 of 2): 0 governed merges, 1 oversized landing on cloud, PR test(app-showcase): round-3 permission-model retest — issues register with evidence #2921 (+5,911/−270 over 23 files, no governed path, no review, merged_by hotlong at 2026-10-17T00:50Z) — a human-merge-size landing by an approver account, put to the maintainer as a third 受管合并认定 row. Next round, exactly: --since-ref objectstack=be076dad28a0 --since-ref objectui=d0a00d795020 --since-ref hotcrm=4f82b8152805 --since-ref cloud=98f0f3a4049f.
    • Duty three, pm:awaiting-maintainer. Five, unchanged: objectstack mcp distribution: verify the remote MCP + OAuth surface against ChatGPT connectors and Codex CLI, and submit the metadata-only registry listings — the remainder of #2714 #20791, hotcrm feat(app-showcase): re-instate grid KPIs, role-gated note, History tab #2066, cloud feat(approvals): SLA escalateTo resolves positions via sys_user_position (ADR-0090 D3 follow-up) #2767 (step (c), the maintainer's secret bulk on both objectos planes; no evidence yet), cloud [11.0][A2] Remove dead author-facing metadata properties (ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove) #2377, cloud chore: version packages #786.
    • From the earlier batches: C3 stage 9 (#15204): declared sharing rules read from the registry, bootstrapDeclaredSharingRules retires, and the ceremony deletes the declared-rule mirrors; the verified marker follows (director ordering ruling) #23952 (stage 9, ruling β on refactor(plugin-security,platform-objects,spec): retire the catalog seeders, the per-organization catalog machinery and the four catalog objects; Setup creation is an environment write under single and refused under a wall (ADR-0131 D2/D3/D5/D13) #15204) received triage's first touch 6217084440 (target:v18; interim os migrate organization-ownership never certifies a database whose packages declare sharing rules: it waits on the declared-rule-mirrors departure (D2) while the same release's boot still seeds them #23948 / PR feat(cli): os migrate organization-ownership reports the declared sharing-rule mirrors as advisory while this release's boot still seeds them #23988 landed) and the cli seat's hand-off 6220693269; cloud-connection: the "Installed Apps" entry opens Setup Packages filtered to Source = marketplace (ruling B on #23892; after the objectui card lands and the pin moves) #23933 (batch 🔗 Broken links detected in documentation #356 item 2's second execution card) is pm:blocked; objectui#12673 (ruled A) landed and closed.
    • Writes planned in this act: this marker; deltas on [Decision] #23217 cannot land as ruled: four of the five request-to-context doors cannot import an internal function of @objectstack/runtime. Home it in @objectstack/core (a new export), keep five copies under a parity pin, or close #23982, security: the 18 migration text says organization admins assign positions and permission sets to their members; the shipped organization_admin sets are read-only on both assignment objects and the server refuses #23960, [Decision] cloud#2910 (the organisation page): which of four framework widenings to build — an invite action on sys_organization, an action disabled-reason key, an "only owner" predicate root, a record-scoped leave confirm? #24034, objectui#12704 and cloud#2932; the word record and label clear on docs(adr): ADR-0078 and ADR-0087 note the conversion-conflict channel's retirement #24046 and ci(rerun-safety): a truthful verdict, passes bounded by the job's time, and a card on a red night #23975 — through the relay as objectstack-fleet[bot], read back. No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched.
28. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 17, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 17, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #43 continuation 3 ledger (block B · batch #358: four rulings recorded and executed, one item held in the box on the maintainer's two questions with a premise correction; the two PR lines recorded on the maintainer's own clicks; three recognition rows awaiting the word) — director seat, session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax, 2026-10-17T02:16Z

    • Batch [WIP] Update action step configuration based on job run #358, the maintainer's words in this session's chat, item by item:
      • [Decision] #23217 cannot land as ruled: four of the five request-to-context doors cannot import an internal function of @objectstack/runtime. Home it in @objectstack/core (a new export), keep five copies under a parity pin, or close #23982 → A (「23982 同意」). Ruling 6227928430; body Ruled:; needs-user-decision removed and the card closed completed (6227941684). runtime: one internal request-to-ExecutionContext resolver for the platform's five hand-rolled copies (rest, runtime, service-settings, service-storage, plugin-hono-server) — not a published export (ruling C′ on #23128, p3) #23217 is the execution card: pointer 6227947754, body Ruled: with item 1 of its scope amended (home @objectstack/core, exported from ., Clause-②: yes (widening), minor; later slices no), pm:blocked → pm:queue for the domain:cli seat.
      • security: the 18 migration text says organization admins assign positions and permission sets to their members; the shipped organization_admin sets are read-only on both assignment objects and the server refuses #23960 — in the box. Two questions, no letter: 「帮我具体分析这个开发复杂吗」 answered by delta 2 (6227987101: A is one sentence; B is an ADR-0090 D12 amendment, a third gate branch, the overrides, four test sites and the console reader — medium to large; a no-code route exists per deployment through an authored adminScope set); 「从实际业务的角度，具体解释目前的业务状态以及遇到的问题」 answered by delta 3 (6228146260), which corrects delta 1's premise 3: ADR-0131 D3 :323–:326 does name who writes an assignment (「created and removed by that organization's admins for its own members」), so the card is the ADR's promise against the code's guard, not text against product; the seat's recommendation is revised to B as the ADR's execution with the boundary 「only catalog items the organisation wall bounds」, A′ = narrow D3 (Tier H), C not recommended. The letter is the maintainer's; the card keeps needs-user-decision.
      • [Decision] cloud#2910 (the organisation page): which of four framework widenings to build — an invite action on sys_organization, an action disabled-reason key, an "only owner" predicate root, a record-scoped leave confirm? #24034 → B′ (「24034 同意」 after the seat's refined recommendation 6227990207 was put to him; read as B′, correctable by a word). Ruling 6228318638; body Ruled:; label removed; closed completed. platform-objects: sys_organization declares no invite action, so an organisation record page cannot offer 邀请成员 in its header (page:header ids resolve only against the object's own actions) #24016 (the declared invite action, carrying leave_organization confirm names neither the organisation nor what is lost: confirmText has no declared record scope for interpolation, and a host cannot override the platform bundle #24021's confirm copy) and leave_organization: no predicate root carries "the caller is this organisation's only owner", so the platform action cannot be disabled for the last owner before the click (better-auth refuses it only after the confirm) #24020 (a roll-up owner_count + a disabled predicate, after a measurement) carry Ruled: lines and left pm:on-hold for pm:queue + pm:retriage; spec: ActionSchema declares disabled but no authored reason, so a header action cannot say why it is unavailable (e.g. "You are the only owner; transfer ownership first") #24018 (6228375994) and leave_organization confirm names neither the organisation nor what is lost: confirmText has no declared record scope for interpolation, and a host cannot override the platform bundle #24021 (6228382654) closed not_planned (close-cards --expect-state pm:on-hold); cloud#2910 pointer 6228368862. No spec key.
      • objectui#12704 → B (「12704 同意」). Ruling 6227971389; body Ruled: re-scoping the card to the objectui regression pin; needs-user-decision → pm:queue, and the domain:ui seat has since dispatched it (pm:dispatched, os-sales). Execution cards filed: platform-objects: System Overview's six metric tiles declare layout.h: 2 and draw a half-empty box; set them to h: 1 (ruling B on objectui#12704) #24126 (platform-objects, System Overview's six tiles h: 2 → h: 1, domain:engine p2 pm:queue) and dashboards: every h: 2 metric tile draws a half-empty box at 1024 px; set them to h: 1, keep the two deliberate h: 4 (ruling B on objectui#12704) hotcrm#2135 (every h: 2 metric tile → h: 1, the two h: 4 kept, p2 pm:queue).
      • cloud#2932 → A (「2932 同意」). Ruling 6228116462; body Ruled:; label removed. Execution cards filed: spec(ai): BlueprintViewSchema and StrictView declare filters (ViewFilterRule[]) and sort, so an AI-built view carries its own filter (ruling A on cloud#2932) #24129 (domain:spec, p1, target:v18, area:ai: filters / sort on BlueprintViewSchema and StrictView) and objectstack-ai/cloud#2954 (pm:blocked, Blocked-by: spec(ai): BlueprintViewSchema and StrictView declare filters (ViewFilterRule[]) and sort, so an AI-built view carries its own filter (ruling A on cloud#2932) #24129: delete the cloud extension at the pin bump). cloud#2922: pointer 6228132356, body Ruled: with its Blocked-by: #2932 line removed, pm:blocked → pm:dispatched. The decision card stays open: close-cards refuses a card with an assignee (hotlong), so the cloud seat closes it when PR feat(lint): bidirectional binding-root check for visibility predicates (ADR-0089 D3b) #2931 lands.
      • PR lines docs(adr): ADR-0078 and ADR-0087 note the conversion-conflict channel's retirement #24046, ci(rerun-safety): a truthful verdict, passes bounded by the job's time, and a card on a red night #23975 → the maintainer's own clicks (2026-10-17T00:29Z / 2026-10-17T00:28Z), recorded on each PR (6227762525, 6227769677) and needs-user-decision cleared by this seat. States at this block: docs(adr): ADR-0078 and ADR-0087 note the conversion-conflict channel's retirement #24046 merged 2026-10-17T01:01Z; ci(rerun-safety): a truthful verdict, passes bounded by the job's time, and a card on a red night #23975 merged 2026-10-17T01:01Z. Whether an at-tier ## Contract review record was written before landing is the next audit round's row.
    • Duty one, recognition: three rows put to the maintainer in this continuation's chat and not yet answered — feat(scripts): check:pnpm-flag-spellings — no committed pnpm call spells -s, --prod=VALUE, --production=VALUE or --no-production, which a global pnpm 11+/12 frontend rejects #23824 and feat(cli,runtime): os dev upgrades a v17-shape development database in place; the ownership ceremony covers the telemetry sibling and adopts legacy shipped-set seeds (ADR-0131) #23906 (os-zhuang approved and merged, no ## Contract review record) and cloud PR test(app-showcase): round-3 permission-model retest — issues register with evidence #2921 (+5,911/−270, hotlong, no governed path, over the human-merge line). Next round anchors stand as the opening marker says.
    • Duty three: five unchanged (objectstack mcp distribution: verify the remote MCP + OAuth surface against ChatGPT connectors and Codex CLI, and submit the metadata-only registry listings — the remainder of #2714 #20791, hotcrm feat(app-showcase): re-instate grid KPIs, role-gated note, History tab #2066, cloud feat(approvals): SLA escalateTo resolves positions via sys_user_position (ADR-0090 D3 follow-up) #2767 step (c), cloud [11.0][A2] Remove dead author-facing metadata properties (ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove) #2377, cloud chore: version packages #786).
    • Harness: STALE (PR docs(pm-dispatch): let an execution seat accept a filer-labelled card when the lane fits the domain table and the body passes the filing gate; triage spot-checks after #23751's three files); the next summon starts in a fresh session.
    • Handling notes, zero bad writes: (a) delta 1 on security: the 18 migration text says organization admins assign positions and permission sets to their members; the shipped organization_admin sets are read-only on both assignment objects and the server refuses #23960 misread ADR-0131 D3; corrected on the card in delta 3 before any letter. (b) post-stamped --body on an execution card must --ack-through that card's own newest comment, not the ruling on the decision card — refused once on platform-objects: sys_organization declares no invite action, so an organisation record page cannot offer 邀请成员 in its header (page:header ids resolve only against the object's own actions) #24016, re-run with the right id. (c) close-cards --stateless skips a card carrying a pm-state (re-run with --expect-state pm:on-hold) and a card with an assignee (cloud#2932 left open, above). (d) The 40-writes-an-hour pace paused the [Decision] cloud#2910 (the organisation page): which of four framework widenings to build — an invite action on sys_organization, an action disabled-reason key, an "only owner" predicate root, a record-scoped leave confirm? #24034 chain sixteen minutes; no write was forced.
    • Writes in this continuation so far: 44 through the relay as objectstack-fleet[bot] — comments, 8 body rewrites, 10 label writes, 4 issue creates, 4 closes — every one read back identical; three tool refusals with zero writes.
    • Inbox after the batch, re-read at this write: objectstack issues 1 (security: the 18 migration text says organization admins assign positions and permission sets to their members; the shipped organization_admin sets are read-only on both assignment objects and the server refuses #23960, in the box) · labelled PRs 0; objectui 0; cloud 4 (chore: version packages #2935, feat(plugin-security): C2-β — explain 引擎 record 粒度行级归因 (#2920) #2939, fix(plugin-security): #2936 — RLS field-existence/tenancyDisabled 网识别 canonical == #2942, chore(release): 破坏性授权变更 changeset 提级 major + v15 升级指南 #2950 — batch Fix link checker CI by excluding Fumadocs framework patterns #359, read once [WIP] Update action step configuration based on job run #358 item 2 has its letter); hotcrm 0.
29. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 17, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 17, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #43 continuation 3 ledger (block C · batch #358 item 2 ruled B after three questions; batch #359 answered 「同意」, five rulings recorded and executed; batch #360 deltas written) — director seat, session_01QJC7i981TSs9L1CGJK59Ax, 2026-10-17T03:37Z

    • Batch [WIP] Update action step configuration based on job run #358 item 2, security: the 18 migration text says organization admins assign positions and permission sets to their members; the shipped organization_admin sets are read-only on both assignment objects and the server refuses #23960 → B (「同意」 on the seat's revised recommendation, after 「帮我具体分析这个开发复杂吗」 → delta 2 6227987101, 「从实际业务的角度…」 → delta 3 6228146260 with the premise-3 correction, 「如果选择B…」 → delta 4 6228658787). Ruling 6228728551; body Ruled:; label removed; closed completed. Execution cards: docs(adr): ADR-0090 D12 names the organisation administrator's assignment boundary (wall-bounded sets only) and ADR-0131 D3 notes it (ruling B on #23960) #24135 (domain:spec, p1, target:v18, needs:contract-review, pm:queue: the ADR-0090 D12 boundary amendment — an organisation administrator assigns only sets with no superuser wildcard, no adminScope, only scope: 'org' capabilities — and the ADR-0131 D3 note; lands first) and plugin-security: organisation admins assign positions and permission sets to their own members inside the D12 boundary — gate branch, overrides, explain and my-delegable-scope, three-posture acceptance (ruling B on #23960) #24136 (domain:services, p1, target:v18, area:access, pm:blocked, Blocked-by: #24135: the gate's third branch, the overrides, the rewritten pin, the two doors, the three-posture acceptance). The v18 migration text stays and becomes true.
    • Batch Fix link checker CI by excluding Fumadocs framework patterns #359, the maintainer's word 「同意」 in this session's chat (B′ / A / A / B / A, Q2 「打开」), deltas 6228803179 / 6228806484 / 6228809852 / 6228814892 / 6228820108:
      • objectui#12704 → B′ (re-opened by ruling B's fallback, dev report 6228515130). Ruling 6229016120; second Ruled: line with the measured acceptance (content height, about 118–125 px, no empty lower half; a geometry pin; fallbackSpan h: 1 for a layout-less metric; chrome unchanged; a server-only stub → letter D); needs-user-decision → pm:queue.
      • cloud#2939 → A, Q2 「打开」. Ruling 6229029648; body Ruled:; label removed; pointer on cloud#2773 6229046258 (its naming clause superseded, its other three items stand). PR feat(core,plugin-security): B2+B4 — posture 阶梯 + capability 派生 (ADR-0095 D2/D3, #2920) #2938 lands by the seat, which files the three follow-up cards.
      • cloud#2942 → Q1 A · Q2 A. Ruling 6229051541; body Ruled:; label removed. cloud#2913 and cloud#2917 re-scoped by Ruled: lines (the reversing targets struck, the new asks kept), their Blocked-by: #2942 lines removed, pm:blocked → pm:queue.
      • cloud#2935 → B (re-scoped to [Decision] cloud#2910 (the organisation page): which of four framework widenings to build — an invite action on sys_organization, an action disabled-reason key, an "only owner" predicate root, a record-scoped leave confirm? #24034 B′; objectui#12764 landed). Ruling 6229091863; body Ruled:; label removed; fallback A′ (maxVisible: 0) recorded; cloud#2910 waits on objectstack#24016 (+ leave_organization: no predicate root carries "the caller is this organisation's only owner", so the platform action cannot be disabled for the last owner before the click (better-auth refuses it only after the confirm) #24020).
      • cloud#2953 → A, D meanwhile. Ruling 6229113608; body Ruled:; label removed. Execution card cloud#2958 (p2, pm:queue: stale-while-error shard identity in apps/objectos/cloudflare/shard-identity.ts).
      • The five cloud decision cards and feat(plugin-security): C2-β — explain 引擎 record 粒度行级归因 (#2920) #2939's PR line are assigned to hotlong, so close-cards leaves them to their owner: each carries its Ruled: line with the label cleared, and the cloud seat closes it.
    • Batch chore: version packages #360 composed and deltas written: [Decision] checklist-test files one open qa-run issue per re-run: 40 of 42 open qa-run issues are re-runs that verified ledger edits. Keep, one record per batch, or file only on a problem? #24127 (6229123659, C recommended: a verification re-run files no qa-run record when green) and cloud#2950 (6229126653, A recommended: no migration for the stranded Copilot drafts). Presented in this continuation's chat after this block.
    • Duty one, recognition: the three rows (feat(scripts): check:pnpm-flag-spellings — no committed pnpm call spells -s, --prod=VALUE, --production=VALUE or --no-production, which a global pnpm 11+/12 frontend rejects #23824, feat(cli,runtime): os dev upgrades a v17-shape development database in place; the ownership ceremony covers the telemetry sibling and adopts legacy shipped-set seeds (ADR-0131) #23906, cloud PR test(app-showcase): round-3 permission-model retest — issues register with evidence #2921) still await the word. Duty three: five unchanged. Harness: STALE; the next summon starts in a fresh session.
    • Handling notes, zero bad writes: the budget pace paused nothing this round (28 left at the chain's start); every write read back identical.
    • Inbox after the batch, re-read at this write: objectstack 1 ([Decision] checklist-test files one open qa-run issue per re-run: 40 of 42 open qa-run issues are re-runs that verified ledger edits. Keep, one record per batch, or file only on a problem? #24127) · objectui 0 · cloud 1 (chore(release): 破坏性授权变更 changeset 提级 major + v15 升级指南 #2950) · hotcrm 0 · batch chore: version packages #360 = [Decision] checklist-test files one open qa-run issue per re-run: 40 of 42 open qa-run issues are re-runs that verified ledger edits. Keep, one record per batch, or file only on a problem? #24127 and cloud#2950.
30. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 17, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 17, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #44 — opening marker, director seat, session_01MVLumUXJ6mkcQv27o7LR1V, 2026-10-17T22:03Z. Summoned by the maintainer's /pm-dispatch 项目总监决裁 in this session's chat. Concurrent-summons rule: no takeover, no handover; summon #38 stays open in parallel. This summon keeps the global series, first batch #361. Batch #360's item 1 (#24127) was ruled C on the domain:devx seat 2's direct channel (6230593290) and landed by PR #24172. Its item 2 (cloud#2950) is outside this session's reach (see Reach). No Ruling: batch line is newer than 6229135019 in either attached repo's comment stream read since 03:30Z.

    • Identity and tier. GET /user answers os-project-manager, which is not in GOVERNED_APPROVERS (os-zhuang, hotlong). This seat submits no review and clicks no merge. Writes go as objectstack-fleet[bot] through the relay and are read back. get_session in this act: last_served_model = configured_model = claude-opus-5-5; CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER = claude-fable-5-1. So this summon serves below the contract-review tier. It writes no ## Contract review record and clears no needs:contract-review label. Rulings are not tier-gated (the charter). permission_mode auto.
    • Harness. check-harness-current.mjs: CURRENT at b9ac35cbfe.
    • Reach. Attached: objectstack and objectui. add_repo refused cloud (no access). hotcrm is a public git read only, with no API. ⇒ The cloud and hotcrm decision boxes and their pm:awaiting-maintainer cards are not read in this summon. That is a reading gap, not a zero.
    • Inbox, re-read at this write. objectstack: 3 needs-user-decision issues, [Decision] #22444's page list-view row refuses the old objectName / viewType spelling at os validate and the page save door, but ruling C declared it yes (widening) on a warning-tier premise: declare the narrowing? #24219, [Decision] The organization administrator's assignment boundary: an assignable set with a wildcard read and no row scope reaches other organizations' SCIM rows in a deployment with no platform baseline #24164 and [Decision] Does ruling 208 R6's dispatch-gates.mjs freeze still bind derivation-truth fixes? Two p2 cards (#24037, #24073) ask the derivation to stop telling devs CI runs what it will not run, while the same files took eight merges since the freeze #24171; 0 labelled PRs. objectui: 0 issues, 0 PRs. Class-1 self-rulings: 0. On [Decision] #22444's page list-view row refuses the old objectName / viewType spelling at os validate and the page save door, but ruling C declared it yes (widening) on a warning-tier premise: declare the narrowing? #24219, criterion ① fails: the maintainer's ruling C item (2) points the other way, and its premise is false, which returns the item to the box. [Decision] The organization administrator's assignment boundary: an assignable set with a wildcard read and no row scope reaches other organizations' SCIM rows in a deployment with no platform baseline #24164 sits on a floor (a permission boundary). On [Decision] Does ruling 208 R6's dispatch-gates.mjs freeze still bind derivation-truth fixes? Two p2 cards (#24037, #24073) ask the derivation to stop telling devs CI runs what it will not run, while the same files took eight merges since the freeze #24171, criterion ① fails: whether a maintainer ruling still binds a class of work is not mechanical. ⇒ Batch [WIP] Remove all Chinese documents from the project #361 = [Decision] #22444's page list-view row refuses the old objectName / viewType spelling at os validate and the page save door, but ruling C declared it yes (widening) on a warning-tier premise: declare the narrowing? #24219 (item 1, blocks in-flight PR feat(spec): ComponentPropsMap gains a 'list-view' row — a page-embedded list view is judged as a list view; stored objectName / viewType convert to data / type (#22444) #24217), [Decision] The organization administrator's assignment boundary: an assignable set with a wildcard read and no row scope reaches other organizations' SCIM rows in a deployment with no platform baseline #24164 (item 2, blocks p1 plugin-security: organisation admins assign positions and permission sets to their own members inside the D12 boundary — gate branch, overrides, explain and my-delegable-scope, three-posture acceptance (ruling B on #23960) #24136), [Decision] Does ruling 208 R6's dispatch-gates.mjs freeze still bind derivation-truth fixes? Two p2 cards (#24037, #24073) ask the derivation to stop telling devs CI runs what it will not run, while the same files took eight merges since the freeze #24171 (item 3, blocks p2 dispatch-gates: a change under scripts/ does not derive check-position-name-fold-loaders, though that gate scans scripts/ — the local --ran reconciliation read 98/98 while CI's lint lane went red on it #24037 and dispatch-gates lists Dogfood Regression Gate as "scheduled BY YOUR PATHS" for a route-ledger.ts change, but its if: skips pull_request and merge_group, so neither PR CI nor the derived commands run the dogfood pins (main red after #24009) #24073). The deltas go on the cards in this act.
    • Duty one, the audit, run in this act. --repos objectstack,objectui --since-ref objectstack=be076dad28a0 --since-ref objectui=d0a00d795020, exit 0, 2 of 2 audited: 12 governed merges and 1 oversized landing.
      • With an at-tier PASS record: feat(fleet-write): pr_create carries labels; os-dev declares skip-changeset in the create's stroke #24175, docs(skills): previous is null on insert in objectstack-data and objectstack-formula, no longer unbound #24174, docs(checklist-test): a verification re-run files no qa-run record; sweeps still file one per run #24172, docs(pm-dispatch): a chat message that lists options and waits is the popup 「卡先于弹窗」 forbids; card first #23969, docs(adr): ADR-0090 D12 names the organization administrator's assignment boundary; ADR-0131 D3 notes it #24163 (FAIL 6232429140, then PASS 6232718234), feat(spec): BlueprintViewSchema and StrictView declare filters and sort, so an AI-built view carries its own filter #24152, feat(metadata-protocol)!: a flow re-save that newly introduces a retired spelling is refused like a new flow's #23986 and objectui#12903.
      • The maintainer's own clicks, recorded by summon Release version 0.1.x for ObjectStack Protocol packages #43 continuation 3: docs(adr): ADR-0078 and ADR-0087 note the conversion-conflict channel's retirement #24046 and ci(rerun-safety): a truthful verdict, passes bounded by the job's time, and a card on a red night #23975.
      • Oversized, merged by os-zhuang, with TIER_DEFAULT PASS records and no governed path: feat(service-print): print a record's print page to a PDF in headless Chromium as the requesting user, and archive it on the record #23811 (+4,074/−68).
      • Recognition rows, 2 new: ci(test-leftovers): report what each test job leaves in the tree; retire Rerun Safety #24211 (.github/workflows/** ×8, +1,008/−1,325; os-zhuang approved and merged; no ## Contract review record) and chore: version packages (next) #23825 (Version Packages, 12,917 changed lines including generated skills/** ×10; merged by os-zhuang). Carried from summon Release version 0.1.x for ObjectStack Protocol packages #43 continuation 3, still without the word: feat(scripts): check:pnpm-flag-spellings — no committed pnpm call spells -s, --prod=VALUE, --production=VALUE or --no-production, which a global pnpm 11+/12 frontend rejects #23824, feat(cli,runtime): os dev upgrades a v17-shape development database in place; the ownership ceremony covers the telemetry sibling and adopts legacy shipped-set seeds (ADR-0131) #23906 and cloud PR test(app-showcase): round-3 permission-model retest — issues register with evidence #2921.
      • Next round, exactly: --since-ref objectstack=b9ac35cbfe60 --since-ref objectui=5ec2175fdf58. hotcrm and cloud stay at 4f82b8152805 / 98f0f3a4049f (not run in this summon).
    • Duty three, pm:awaiting-maintainer. objectstack mcp distribution: verify the remote MCP + OAuth surface against ChatGPT connectors and Codex CLI, and submit the metadata-only registry listings — the remainder of #2714 #20791 is unchanged: its newest comment is from 2026-10-12, with no evidence that the act happened. objectui: 0. hotcrm feat(app-showcase): re-instate grid KPIs, role-gated note, History tab #2066 and cloud feat(approvals): SLA escalateTo resolves positions via sys_user_position (ADR-0090 D3 follow-up) #2767, [11.0][A2] Remove dead author-facing metadata properties (ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove) #2377 and chore: version packages #786 are not read (Reach).
    • Writes planned in this act: this marker, then the deltas on [Decision] #22444's page list-view row refuses the old objectName / viewType spelling at os validate and the page save door, but ruling C declared it yes (widening) on a warning-tier premise: declare the narrowing? #24219, [Decision] The organization administrator's assignment boundary: an assignable set with a wildcard read and no row scope reaches other organizations' SCIM rows in a deployment with no platform baseline #24164 and [Decision] Does ruling 208 R6's dispatch-gates.mjs freeze still bind derivation-truth fixes? Two p2 cards (#24037, #24073) ask the derivation to stop telling devs CI runs what it will not run, while the same files took eight merges since the freeze #24171, through post-stamped with each write read back. No Routine, no cron, no subagent, no dev dispatched.
31. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 18, 2026

    

    objectstack-fleetbot

    on Oct 18, 2026

    Contributor

    More actions

    Summon #44 ledger (block B · batch #361: two rulings recorded and executed, one item held in the box on the maintainer's question) — director seat, session_01MVLumUXJ6mkcQv27o7LR1V, 2026-10-18T00:15Z

    • The maintainer's word in this session's chat: 「24217 A 24171 B;24164 重新和我讨论分析完整的业务需求，并评估相关的开发工作量」.
      • [Decision] #22444's page list-view row refuses the old objectName / viewType spelling at os validate and the page save door, but ruling C declared it yes (widening) on a warning-tier premise: declare the narrowing? #24219 → A (「24217 A」, naming the PR the card rules on; against the seat's B). Ruling 6243467550; body Ruled:; needs-user-decision removed and closed completed (6243568081, close-cards --expect-state needs-user-decision --no-skip-pr-referenced, since PR feat(spec): ComponentPropsMap gains a 'list-view' row — a page-embedded list view is judged as a list view; stored objectName / viewType convert to data / type (#22444) #24217 references the card). PR feat(spec): ComponentPropsMap gains a 'list-view' row — a page-embedded list view is judged as a list view; stored objectName / viewType convert to data / type (#22444) #24217's changeset stays yes (widening), minor. Pointers on spec(ui): ComponentPropsMap has no list-view row, so a page-embedded list view's properties are judged by nothing: kanban.groupField and options.grid pass on a page while every list-view door refuses them #22444 (6243490831) and PR feat(spec): ComponentPropsMap gains a 'list-view' row — a page-embedded list view is judged as a list view; stored objectName / viewType convert to data / type (#22444) #24217 (6243498936): the domain:spec seat 1 re-renders the at-tier record with the ruling as its ② basis and files the hotcrm embeddedListView card at landing. Workload: 0 patch rounds.
      • [Decision] Does ruling 208 R6's dispatch-gates.mjs freeze still bind derivation-truth fixes? Two p2 cards (#24037, #24073) ask the derivation to stop telling devs CI runs what it will not run, while the same files took eight merges since the freeze #24171 → B (「24171 B」, the seat's recommendation). Ruling 6243472660; body Ruled:; needs-user-decision → pm:queue + priority:p2 + area:devpath (domain:skills stays): it is the execution card for the one-sentence edit at instrument-discipline.md L10 (Tier S). dispatch-gates: a change under scripts/ does not derive check-position-name-fold-loaders, though that gate scans scripts/ — the local --ran reconciliation read 98/98 while CI's lint lane went red on it #24037 (pointer 6243481773) and dispatch-gates lists Dogfood Regression Gate as "scheduled BY YOUR PATHS" for a route-ledger.ts change, but its if: skips pull_request and merge_group, so neither PR CI nor the derived commands run the dogfood pins (main red after #24009) #24073 (pointer 6243487446): body Ruled: with their terms (3 and 2), pm:blocked → pm:queue. Workload: 1 Tier S PR plus 2 M cards.
      • [Decision] The organization administrator's assignment boundary: an assignable set with a wildcard read and no row scope reaches other organizations' SCIM rows in a deployment with no platform baseline #24164 — in the box. The maintainer asked for the full business requirement and the workload. Delta 2 (6243615637) re-cuts the options: E, a platform default at the one RLS collection point (collectRLSPolicies): on a platform identity object with no held policy, the platform's own scope applies instead of no filter. It closes the class [finding] org_member can read every sys_invitation row in the org — other people's emails, granted roles, inviter — intended? #8095 / member_default gives every authenticated member read on sys_scim_user / sys_scim_group with no row policy and no tenant column: one organization's IdP-provisioned users (emails, names) are readable from any other #20001 / security (P0 suspect): the managed-object blanket gives non-admin shipped sets an object-level read on two access: private credential-bearing identity objects that the sets themselves declare deny-by-design #20027 were fixed in one instance at a time, and is now recommended over A′. Fallback A′. Measured: 0 '*' sets among real producers (objectstack examples and apps, hotcrm's 7 sets), and 0 fallbackPermissionSet: null outside tests. The letter is the maintainer's; the card keeps needs-user-decision.
    • Duty one, recognition: 5 rows await the word: ci(test-leftovers): report what each test job leaves in the tree; retire Rerun Safety #24211 and chore: version packages (next) #23825 (this summon), and feat(scripts): check:pnpm-flag-spellings — no committed pnpm call spells -s, --prod=VALUE, --production=VALUE or --no-production, which a global pnpm 11+/12 frontend rejects #23824, feat(cli,runtime): os dev upgrades a v17-shape development database in place; the ownership ceremony covers the telemetry sibling and adopts legacy shipped-set seeds (ADR-0131) #23906 and cloud PR test(app-showcase): round-3 permission-model retest — issues register with evidence #2921 (carried).
    • Writes in this summon so far: 18 through the relay as objectstack-fleet[bot] (10 comments, 4 body rewrites, 3 label writes, 1 close), every one read back identical. One close-cards dry run skipped the card on an open PR reference before the real run passed --no-skip-pr-referenced; it wrote nothing.