B.Tech AI/ML Student · Preparing for AI Safety Evaluator / Agent Safety & Safeguards roles
I am building the practical skills needed to evaluate tool-using AI agents safely and reproducibly. My focus is turning safety policies and tool-use risks into clear test cases, metrics, graders, mitigations, and regression suites that another person can independently run and verify.
I design controlled evaluations, measure both safety and useful-task performance, and document limitations honestly.
- Translating safety policies into measurable behaviors
- Designing realistic test cases (benign, harmful, ambiguous, over-refusal)
- Running controlled model and agent evaluations with full experimental metadata
- Building deterministic and model-based graders
- Calculating core safety and usefulness metrics (attack success rate, correct-refusal, over-refusal, task completion)
- Proposing and testing mitigations while checking for new trade-offs
- Creating held-out regression tests and one-command reproducible suites
- Writing clear technical reports with honest limitations
Lightweight Python for evaluation work Variables, functions, CSV/JSONL handling, API calls, error handling & retries, saving prompts/responses/parameters, basic pandas, simple pytest assertions
Model & Agent Fundamentals Tokens & context windows · System / developer / user / tool instructions · Refusal vs safe-completion behavior · Direct & indirect prompt injection · Multi-turn manipulation · Tool selection & authorization · Memory poisoning · Sensitive-data disclosure · Under-refusal & over-refusal · Trusted vs untrusted content
Evaluation Design Threat models · Behavioral specifications · Positive & negative controls · Binary / ordinal / multi-label rubrics · Deterministic, model-based, and human graders · Development vs held-out sets · Repeated trials · Full reproducibility
Basic Statistics for Safety Work Success/failure rates · Attack-success rate · Correct-refusal & over-refusal rates · Task-completion rate · Precision/recall · False positives/negatives · Confidence intervals
I previously built practical Android applications (Jetpack Compose, foreground services, overlays, state machines, privacy controls, offline fallbacks, unit-tested behavior engines).
That work trained me to:
- Prefer small, understandable systems with explicit boundaries
- Document what a system can and cannot do
- Turn vague requirements into testable behavior
- Write tests and keep clear records of limitations
These habits map directly to evaluation design and reproducible safety work.
| Project | What it shows |
|---|---|
| Sparrow | Offline Android floating companion — overlay service, gesture handling, local persistence, unit-tested behavior |
| Charging- | Jetpack Compose dashboard with telemetry, state classification, thermal warnings, automated tests |
| Pocket Pet / OrangePet | Modular overlay companions with behavior schedulers, privacy controls, and explicit platform limits |
| Obsession Icon Pack | Custom visual design + launcher integration |
(Evaluation harnesses and safety test suites are in active preparation and will be added here as they become reproducible.)
- Clear architecture and documented limitations
- Unit testing and modular design
- Full recording of prompts, responses, parameters, and timestamps
- Preference for work another person can independently reproduce
- Honest reporting of remaining risks and over-refusal trade-offs
- Controlled evaluation pipelines for tool-using agents
- Grader construction and validation
- Mitigation experiments with safety–usefulness measurement
- Regression suites that run with one command
- Professional evaluation reports with threat models, methodology, results, and limitations
- GitHub: @maxew6
- X: @maheshngxt
- Email: maheshkonda564@gmail.com
- Location: India
This profile is a record of deliberate skill-building toward AI Safety Evaluator work — focused on reproducibility, clear measurement, and honest documentation of limitations.