Repository navigation
Add Court Rules to Public Records / Court / Criminal Records - #789
Open
foklepoint wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
foklepoint wants to merge 1 commit into
foklepoint wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds Court Rules to the Court / Criminal Records category, following the enriched
arf.jsonformat in the README.Court Rules is free and available for public use with no account. It organizes U.S. federal court rules, district local rules, individual judge standing orders and court holidays by court, and adds a filing deadline calculator that counts calendar, business and court days for each district. It also serves the same data over an open API (https://www.courtrules.app/api) and an MCP server (https://mcp.courtrules.app/mcp), which is why
apiis set to true.It sits next to CourtListener, PACER and Caselaw Access Project because it answers a question those case-law sources do not: which rule and which judge's standing order apply to a filing, and what the resulting deadline date is.