Skip to content

docs(citation): add CITATION.cff with the author's ORCID (0000-0002-3078-6652) - #34

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/citation-orcid
Oct 1, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/citation-orcid

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Adds the author's ORCID iD, 0000-0002-3078-6652, to this repo's citation metadata.

  • CITATION.cff: created

Part of an estate-wide rollout. The template's own 0000-0000 placeholder is fixed at source in hyperpolymath/rsr-template-repo#214. No licence fields were added or changed.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01B2ARtAVppZ7x7mVY5u6nAz

…078-6652)

- CITATION.cff: created

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3078-6652

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01B2ARtAVppZ7x7mVY5u6nAz
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 1, 2026 02:37
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review in Change Stack →

Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius.

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 57 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 72a3dcb5-d5bc-4a4e-bf29-e44295f5b1d6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1e9233c and 1c042b3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CITATION.cff

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 839e1c4d-c67d-408e-9c40-13bb2115c6fa

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d97ecaa and 1e9233c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CITATION.cff

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (22)
  • GitHub Check: copilot-pull-request-reviewer
  • GitHub Check: semgrep-cloud-platform/scan
  • GitHub Check: governance / Debt ratchet
  • GitHub Check: governance / Licence consistency
  • GitHub Check: governance / Guix packaging policy (Nix retired)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Allowlist Preflight
  • GitHub Check: governance / Trusted-base reduction policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Live Actions policy (credentialed advisory)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Security policy checks
  • GitHub Check: governance / Exemption ratchet
  • GitHub Check: governance / Language / package anti-pattern policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Workflow security linter
  • GitHub Check: governance / Well-Known (RFC 9116 + RSR)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Code quality + docs
  • GitHub Check: governance / Actions lockfile verify
  • GitHub Check: governance / Check Workflow Staleness
  • GitHub Check: secret-scan / gitleaks
  • GitHub Check: secret-scan / rust-secrets
  • GitHub Check: secret-scan / shell-secrets
  • GitHub Check: analyze (actions, none)
  • GitHub Check: Proof core and rejection controls
  • GitHub Check: Canonical Echo correspondence
🔇 Additional comments (1)
CITATION.cff (1)

1-29: LGTM!


📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added software citation information for epistemic-types, including its description, author details, repository link and keywords.

Walkthrough

The pull request adds a CITATION.cff record for epistemic-types. It includes a description, author and ORCID, repository URL, and keywords.

Changes

Citation metadata

Layer / File(s) Summary
Add software citation record
CITATION.cff
Adds citation metadata for the software, including its description, author and ORCID, repository URL, and keywords.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 1e923

The new citation metadata is valid and no concrete merge-blocking issue is established. The ORCID attribution could not be independently confirmed, but no conflicting evidence was found.

Architecture Summary

Architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to 1e923

The change affects 1 system.

Changed systems: CITATION.cff

Architecture concerns
No architecture-level concerns identified.

Review details

Systems and components

  • observed — CITATION.cff (service) was modified; 1 changed file maps to changed impact.

Before / after behavior

  • observed — Modified behavior in CITATION.cff: Adds citation metadata identifying the software, describing its scope, naming its author and ORCID, linking its repository, and listing associated keywords.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarises the main change: adding a CITATION.cff file that includes the author's ORCID.
Description check ✅ Passed The description directly explains the addition of the author's ORCID to the repository's citation metadata and identifies the created file.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
  • Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Autopilot is currently an internal CodeRabbit preview.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

A rabbit adds a citation with care,
A name and ORCID are recorded there.
The repository link joins the page,
Keywords mark the software’s range.
Then off hops the rabbit, pleased with the change.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai Bot previously approved these changes Oct 1, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot review overview

🟢 Approval recommended

The citation metadata is consistent with the repository and uses valid CFF fields.

Review effort: Balanced
Findings: None

What changed in this PR

Adds repository citation metadata, including the author’s ORCID.

Changes:

  • Creates a valid CFF 1.2 citation record.
  • Records project details, author identity, repository URL, and keywords.
File Description
CITATION.cff Adds citation metadata with the author’s ORCID.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

…D coverage

Follow-up to the estate ORCID rollout (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3078-6652):
- title → the README's project name "Epistemic Types"

Every wording change is taken from this repo's own README or
Project.toml. No licence fields or SPDX headers were added or changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01B2ARtAVppZ7x7mVY5u6nAz
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit cdad8f8 into main Oct 1, 2026
26 of 27 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the chore/citation-orcid branch October 1, 2026 14:37
hyperpolymath added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2026
#42)

## Summary

GitHub's lock enforcement refuses a record for a tagged action whose
`ref` repeats the SHA, in the called repository's lock at the pinned
commit. The standards pins here (`a26cc747`, `bd0df9ea`) fail that
check, so `governance` and `secret-scanner` startup-fail with no jobs.
Standards `75bd5994` records tags in its own lock.

Same fix as choreographic-types #34.

## Changes

- Repin `governance.yml` and `secret-scanner.yml` to
`75bd5994470661a099df562d6d5ad2fe744dbd66`.
- Record the standards edge in `actions.lock` (one `dependencies:`
record with the matching `uses:` list, plus the actions it reaches at
their release tags, copied from standards' own lock at that commit).
Before, both workflows had empty lock entries.

## Testing

`check-lock-sync.sh` and `check-action-pinning.js` from
affinescript-libraries, run here: lock in sync, transitively closed, all
refs pinned. On main the same sync check reports both standards refs
missing. The real test is those two jobs creating jobs on this PR; I
have not seen that yet.

---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01MF5GeeBBDF6sUzr6pZTjWV)_

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants