stkh_req and feat_req as code not as need - #162
Draft
anmittag wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
anmittag
requested review from
PandaeDo,
RolandJentschETAS,
aschemmel-tech,
masc2023 and
pahmann
as code owners
August 27, 2026 14:18
Contributor
License Check Results🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command: bazel run --lockfile_mode=error //:license-checkStatus: Click to expand output |
anmittag
marked this pull request as draft
August 27, 2026 14:35
Member
Author
|
needs more to be changed then removing the two need :( |
Contributor
As the old needs were referenced in some other needs & places you either need to remove those references, or what you can also do is duplicate the thing. Have it one time as a |
RolandJentschETAS
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Result
a) there is none of the req unintenionally in the Cross Repo Metrics Report
b) Modules using the template are avoiding to create one on module level unintentionally