Skip to content

roadmap: Tier 1 in progress; a code-quality review command in Tier 2 #67

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
d6veteran merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2026
+24 −6
Merged

roadmap: Tier 1 in progress; a code-quality review command in Tier 2 #67

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
30 changes: 24 additions & 6 deletions ROADMAP.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -110,8 +110,8 @@ Dropped with ck2: its 0.2.0 release plan, which would have replaced ck in the `c

| # | Opportunity | Why Now | Success Signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | **Try 0.1.19 to 0.1.28 in d20mob** | Stable moved from `v0.1.19` to `v0.1.28` on 2026-11-06 ([code-katz/claude-plugins#11](https://github.com/code-katz/claude-plugins/pull/11)), at your word, before any of 0.1.19 to 0.1.28 was tried by hand in a d20mob session | In d20mob: a memory save shows the proposal and then the approval prompt, `/ck:do` runs, `/ck:cost` prints a real table, the four checks in [code-katz/ck#51](https://github.com/code-katz/ck/pull/51) pass, a merge prints one cost line for the right pull request, a lane that runs a gate skill ends with only its finished sentence, a phase's stages open on their job word's model and effort with no ruling in the row, with `/ck:cost history` showing the cost of each, and no session says "nothing is needed" with work waiting; if one fails, it is fixed in the next release, or stable goes back to `v0.1.19` |
| 2 | **Measure d20mob's 400K auto-compact test** | The compaction evaluation chose this over a ck feature. The setting went into d20mob's local settings on 2026-10-30, and the baseline is saved | On 2026-11-06, a pass or fail against the baseline; the prediction is $116 to $154 a week saved, in API-equivalent dollars |
| 1 | **Try 0.1.19 to 0.1.28 in d20mob** (in progress since 2026-11-07) | Stable moved from `v0.1.19` to `v0.1.28` on 2026-11-06 ([code-katz/claude-plugins#11](https://github.com/code-katz/claude-plugins/pull/11)), at your word, before any of 0.1.19 to 0.1.28 was tried by hand in a d20mob session | In d20mob: a memory save shows the proposal and then the approval prompt, `/ck:do` runs, `/ck:cost` prints a real table, the four checks in [code-katz/ck#51](https://github.com/code-katz/ck/pull/51) pass, a merge prints one cost line for the right pull request, a lane that runs a gate skill ends with only its finished sentence, a phase's stages open on their job word's model and effort with no ruling in the row, with `/ck:cost history` showing the cost of each, and no session says "nothing is needed" with work waiting; if one fails, it is fixed in the next release, or stable goes back to `v0.1.19` |
| 2 | **Measure d20mob's 400K auto-compact test** (in progress since 2026-11-07) | The compaction evaluation chose this over a ck feature. The setting went into d20mob's local settings on 2026-10-30, and the baseline is saved | On 2026-11-06, a pass or fail against the baseline; the prediction is $116 to $154 a week saved, in API-equivalent dollars |

### Tier 2: High Value, Plan for Next Sprint

Expand All @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ Dropped with ck2: its 0.2.0 release plan, which would have replaced ck in the `c
| 1 | **The lean review's remaining recommendations** ([ck: is it lean?](https://claude.ai/artifact/PKCgiGsjZroKmLVXXEjuuB)); R1 and R3 shipped in 0.1.21 | Fewer tokens per session and per command | Each one is weighed on its own, by tokens saved per week |
| 2 | **Template changes reach projects** | A rule fixed in ck's "How we work" template is missing from every project until someone copies it by hand; d20mob's questions came as chips because of this | A changed sentence can go into a reviewed section as a one-line edit, with no redraft; `scripts/claude-md.py status` already reports "behind: yes" |
| 3 | **A release in one command** | About eight hand steps per release (tag, GitHub release, ck-next's four fields, the installs), seven releases since 2026-10-28, and `claude plugin update` moving the wrong install three days running | One script can tag, release, pin ck-next and set each main install from the DEVLOG entry; it is next after the d20mob trial on the releases page, now as 0.1.29, with its own plan |
| 4 | **A code-quality review command** | One ck command reviews a project's code, or one area of it, for quality: patterns and practices, duplication, complexity to simplify, dead code, dependency versions, and overall maintainability, and ends in a page of findings you comment on. Today nothing covers dead code, dependency versions or a whole project; ck2's `/ck:lean` and the outcome loop were not planned | It can reuse Claude Code's own `/simplify` (reuse, simplification, efficiency) and `/code-review` (bugs) instead of rebuilding them; findings ranked by upkeep saved are worth the tokens a run costs. A design session investigates first, then you choose |

### Tier 3: Strategic / Longer Horizon

Expand All @@ -133,10 +134,9 @@ Dropped with ck2: its 0.2.0 release plan, which would have replaced ck in the `c
## Recommended Sequencing

```
Now: a d20mob phase on 0.1.28 (stable and ck-next), checking 0.1.19 to 0.1.28
Next: 0.1.29, a release in one command, with its own plan
2026-11-06: measure d20mob's 400K auto-compact test
Later: template changes reach projects; the lean review's remaining recommendations
Now: a d20mob phase on 0.1.28 (stable and ck-next), checking 0.1.19 to 0.1.28; measuring d20mob's 400K auto-compact test (both in progress)
Next: 0.1.29, a release in one command, with its own plan; the code-quality review command's design
Later: the code-quality review command; template changes reach projects; the lean review's remaining recommendations
```

---
Expand All @@ -162,6 +162,24 @@ Later: template changes reach projects; the lean review's remaining recommendati

## Revision History

## [2026-11-07] Tier 1 in progress; a code-quality review command in Tier 2

**Change Type:** `add`
**Triggered by:** `user request`
**Items Affected:** Tier 1 items 1 and 2; Tier 2 item 4; Recommended Sequencing

### What Changed
Both Tier 1 items are in progress: trying 0.1.19 to 0.1.28 in d20mob, and measuring the 400K auto-compact test. Tier 2 gains item 4, a code-quality review command: one ck feature that reviews a project's code for patterns and practices, duplication, complexity, dead code, dependency versions and maintainability.

### Why
You asked whether the roadmap had such a command; it did not. Claude Code's `/simplify` and `/code-review` already cover part of it for a single change, so the design looks first at reusing them, and adds only what they leave out.

### Open Questions Resolved / Added
- Resolved: none.
- Added: can a ck command call `/simplify` and `/code-review` and gather their findings with its own on one page?

---

## [2026-11-07] Stable on 0.1.28; How we work 0.1.28 in d20mob and hireling

**Change Type:** `progress`
Expand Down