You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 8, 2026. It is now read-only.
We will not know if #549 / #557 / #558 / #552 worked. The usage chip is a turn sum (#547) plus, later, occupancy (#556). There is no per-turn
record of what we sent and whether we stayed put.
Orrery writes a routing_record even when the policy is “stay.” We do not
need their router. We need the table.
Goal
One structured row per completed (or aborted) turn, host-local or a small
session meta field — not a new product:
Parent
#548 (agent session architecture)
Problem
We will not know if #549 / #557 / #558 / #552 worked. The usage chip is a
turn sum (#547) plus, later, occupancy (#556). There is no per-turn
record of what we sent and whether we stayed put.
Orrery writes a
routing_recordeven when the policy is “stay.” We do notneed their router. We need the table.
Goal
One structured row per completed (or aborted) turn, host-local or a small
session
metafield — not a new product:client tokenizer — otherwise omit, do not invent
if cheap
Success: after a week of use we can answer “did #558 raise cache-read
ratio?” and “did Next mid-session blow the prefix?” without reading Blob.
Constraints
schema does not churn.
lesson).
Suggested next
create-planafter #558’s assembly order is real enough to name the fields.