Enforce expected recipient fingerprints and refresh app screenshots - #79
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Encryption previously displayed a recipient fingerprint but did not enforce an independently supplied expectation. Add an optional expected fingerprint to single-file, batch, large-file, and CLI encryption. The backend compares it with the actual decoded public key before encryption or output creation, preserving existing behavior when omitted.
Validation:
npm run check: TypeScript, 4 API tests, and 275 unit tests passed;npm run buildpassed.Local native checks used the existing liboqs 0.15.0 installation with liboqs-python 0.16.0, which emits a version warning. Chromium was selected from an existing local installation via
UI_BROWSER_EXECUTABLE.