Repository navigation
Conversation
Trace changed behavior through unchanged code after a completed primary review, keeping scope fixed and reporting supported additional defects.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds
change-impact-reviewto the engineering plugin as a second pass after a completed CE or other primary review. It follows changed behavior into unchanged code and later effects, keeps the reviewed revision fixed, and reports supported additional defects separately from the primary findings.Invoke it with the completed primary receipt and exact base/head revisions. It preserves the original review verdict and does not authorize fixes or shipping. The existing interactive review skill continues to present completed reviews.
Verification
Skill and catalogue validation passed, all 21 existing tests passed, and an independent focused review found no issues. Catalogue CI is green.
The existing-case comparison produced seven valid pairs from eight attempts. Two independent graders agreed on all 14 anonymous outputs. Both arms scored 0/4 on the seeded defect criteria. The extra pass added one supported unpinned-package concern, but missed the required cache-poisoning chain. It added no control alarms; some inherited alarms remain unsettled because the scoring files do not establish manifest absence.
The failed main handoff remains unscorable. Separate actual diagnostics passed the repaired execution protocol and are excluded from scores. These four partly reused cases do not establish a general review-quality improvement or justify enabling this pass by default.