Skip to content

About the "3D + SAM" method mentioned in the paper: #36

Description

@XXXCARREY

I notice that the best results on Class-agnostic evaluation on ScanNet200 are based on the "3D + SAM" model. Does this SAM refer to the original SAM? I checked the code, and it seems that the segmenter2d does not include an option for the original SAM; it only has options like Grounded-SAM, etc. Could you please tell me how to reproduce the highest-performing method mentioned in the paper? Thank you very much.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions