Repository navigation
Clarify the plan's role when reviewing a filing - #284
Merged
Merged
Conversation
nonprofittechy
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Review page describes missing plan items as a warning and implies that leaving them out can delay the case. Introduce them with “Other filers like you often include these documents,” explain that the plan is not court advice about what must be filed, and make clear that the filer decides what to include and can continue with their existing documents. Change the action to “Review your plan” and use an information icon.
Validation: updated the existing Review rendering assertion; repository pre-commit/pre-push checks.
Closes #252.