Skip to content

knowledge(vllm-omni): 1 change(s) from refine - #401

Merged
tzhouam merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
kb/vllm-omni/vllm-omni-refine-4ed843575a53
Oct 23, 2026
Merged

tzhouam merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
kb/vllm-omni/vllm-omni-refine-4ed843575a53

Conversation

@tzhouam

@tzhouam tzhouam commented Oct 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Generated automatically by the Copilot knowledge service (changeset vllm-omni-refine-4ed843575a53).

op page rule
add repos/vllm-omni/components/configuration/rules-thinker-prefix-cache.md VLLM-OMNI-PR9203-THINKER-PREFIX-CACHE

Generator: zcode:GLM-5.3 · judge: codex:gpt-6-sol:medium.
The publisher merges it only if its local gate passes on the exact merge result.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-23T12:59:18.299106Z 42db19b PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@tzhouam
tzhouam merged commit fb71757 into main Oct 23, 2026
3 checks passed

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 42db19b29c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

- 验收:`test_thinker_prefix_cache_defaults` 在最终 `stage0.yaml_engine_args["enable_prefix_caching"]` 上断言实际参数化的行:两个 CUDA turn profile 为 `True`;这两个 profile 在 npu/rocm/xpu/musa 下为 `False`;CUDA 下所列 MRv2 / duplex / base profile 行为 `False`(非 CUDA 平台仅对这两个 turn profile 有覆盖,新增其它 profile×platform 组合须自行补参数行)。测试须 pin `platforms.current_omni_platform.device_name` 并走 `_apply_platform_overrides` + `merge_pipeline_deploy`;e2e 断言 Thinker 开、Talker/Code2Wav 保持关,并附 batch-invariant(46/46)、Daily-Omni(0.7157 vs 0.7157)、Seed-TTS WER(0.0207 vs 0.0215)等行为等价证据;文档(`docs/serving/video_stream_api.md`)与新默认值同步。
^[PR #9203]

<!-- kb:rule status=active since=v0.30.0 -->

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Do not activate an unmerged configuration rule

At the reviewed commit, PR #9203 is still open against main, but this marker advertises its behavior as active since v0.30.0, a release that predates the PR. Reviews consuming the knowledge tree can therefore require defaults and tests that are absent from the released and audited source snapshot. Keep this as a candidate until the prerequisite PRs and #9203 merge, then activate it with the correct release/source pin.

AGENTS.md reference: knowledge/AGENTS.md:L16-L16

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.


# Thinker prefix cache deploy 默认值

## VLLM-OMNI-PR9203-THINKER-PREFIX-CACHE — Thinker prefix cache 默认开启仅限已验证的 CUDA turn profile

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Put the learned rule in the routed owner rules file

This PR-derived rule is added as a standalone page, but the prescribed owner route stops at components/configuration/rules.md, so reviewers following that route will never load these constraints merely because _index.md links them. PR/review intake is explicitly restricted to executable rules in the nearest owner's rules.md; merge the reusable invariant into that routed file rather than creating this parallel rule page.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L12-L17

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant