Skip to content

Standalone SDPi - 2.0 - #579

Draft
ToddCooper wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
576-standalone-sdpi---20
Draft

ToddCooper wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
576-standalone-sdpi---20

Conversation

@ToddCooper

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📑 Description

This PR extends the initial work, "SDPi 1.0" (see PR #542 ), which was more focused on the significant structural adjustments, to update the content to be more complete and more cohesive. See the associated issues for the specific updates to be made in this pull request.

☑ Mandatory Tasks

The following aspects have been respected by the pull request assignee and at least one reviewer:

  • Changelog update (necessity checked and entry added or not added respectively)
    • Pull Request Assignee
    • Reviewer

With #576

+ a Typo correction to "SOMDS Dec Gateway"
@ToddCooper ToddCooper linked an issue Sep 9, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
7 tasks
@ToddCooper ToddCooper self-assigned this Sep 9, 2026
@ToddCooper ToddCooper linked an issue Sep 9, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
11 tasks
@ToddCooper ToddCooper added this to the SDPi 2.6 Review milestone Sep 9, 2026
With renamed branch, added both the Standard and the Supplement issues.
@ToddCooper

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@PaulMartinsen - So I went ahead and started work on the Standalone SDPi 2.0 with this PR & branch that references the two 2.0 issues. ALSO I went ahead and updated the "SOMDS Dec Gateway" ... which was indeed in the ics-overview.adoc file.

In addition to the key items that are listed in the two referenced issues, there will be additional editorial changes that come along, and I'll use this branch to integrate those as well, especially since the 2.0 has "editorial clean-up" as one of its objectives.

@ToddCooper

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@PaulMartinsen Per issue #574, could you add some initial "ROUGH" content to Export of Conformance Requirements; I will "pretty" it up with commentary but you have the last version of the content that you provided Mary Jungers for the profiles.IHE.net publication. So I'd like to start with a known SOURCE OF TRUTH ... @PaulMartinsen !

@PaulMartinsen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I can add this but it could take a couple of weeks; most of my spare time is going into context management for external control at the moment. Which .adoc file would you like this to go into?

@ToddCooper

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

2026.09.11 SDPi Friday -
First review of this PR during the Friday call.

@PaulMartinsen - group discussed whether or not to include #574 with this PR, and given the documentation of these folders in the new Forward section, it was agreed that it made sense.

NOTE: TBD if we also add #572 to this as well. This would add the content to the refactored referenced-artifacts folder

Removing these Supplement instructions from the Standard content.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Standalone SDPi - Supplement - 2.0 Standalone SDPi - Standard - 2.0 Add exported-artifacts folder for generated files

2 participants