Skip to content

style: remove unused homepage CTA styles - #11

Merged
ianchen0119 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
marketing/homepage-value-proposition
Sep 6, 2026
Merged

style: remove unused homepage CTA styles#11
ianchen0119 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
marketing/homepage-value-proposition

Conversation

@ianchen0119

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 6, 2026 14:54
@ianchen0119
ianchen0119 merged commit 7ccbe38 into main Sep 6, 2026
1 check passed
@ianchen0119
ianchen0119 deleted the marketing/homepage-value-proposition branch September 6, 2026 14:54

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The removed CSS and markup appear to be truly unused after the homepage CTA block deletion, and the remaining homepage markdown/CSS is consistent and well-formed.

Pull request overview

This PR simplifies the docs homepage presentation by removing the unused homepage CTA block and cleaning up related styling, while also streamlining the “grid cards” feature list formatting on both English and Chinese landing pages.

Changes:

  • Removed the .gth-cta homepage CTA styles from extra.css and narrowed the slate-theme selector list accordingly.
  • Removed the homepage CTA section (and its buttons) from docs/index.md and docs/index.zh.md.
  • Simplified the homepage “grid cards” list items by removing the Material icon shortcodes.
File summaries
File Description
docs/stylesheets/extra.css Removes .gth-cta styling and updates slate theme selector grouping now that CTA is gone.
docs/index.md Removes the CTA section/buttons and simplifies the homepage cards list item formatting.
docs/index.zh.md Mirrors the English homepage changes: removes the CTA section/buttons and simplifies cards list item formatting.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants