ctsm5.4.054: Update submodules to latest for cesm3_0_beta10a

[ekluzek]

Description of changes

Update submodules: ccs_config, cime, cdeps, cmeps, share
Current latest submodules that will be coming in cesm3_0_beta10

cesm3_0_beta09 had: cime6.4.1, share1.0.21, cdeps1.0.101, cmeps1.1.54

Also fix the two multi-instance tests that were failing, by making sure DGLC couples less times than ROF.

And add new ctsm_release testlist which runs every test. And make sure the list of tests that should be subsets of aux_clm or ctsm_sci are so (as well as fates, and crop_cal). And bring in a script that checks the testlist for these features and will also fix them. And bring that script into a github workflow so the testlist is checked for basic requirements.

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any:

• @slevis-lmwg

CTSM issues resolved or otherwise addressed, if any:

• Fixes Some multi-instance tests fail with DGLC #4161
• Fixes Add a new ctsm_release testlist that runs all other testlists #4157
• Fixes Have matrixcn, aux_clm_mpi_serial, prealpha, prebeta, clm_pymods, clm_short, aux_cime_baselines, subset_data testlists be subsets of the aux_clm testlist #4158
• Fixes Make: hillslope, fire, interim-restart, ssp, crop_calendars testlists a subset of ctsm_sci #4156

Any user interface changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?

CIME:
create_test has new options: --no-batch-build, --ninja, --gmake

ccs_config:
New MOM grid for 2-degree tx2_0v1, used in ne16pg3_t201 alias

CMEPS:
move CALENDAR to env_run.xml
Reduce mediator memory
Fix single column logic

CDEPS:
Confirm that mesh size matches expected size
Fix some single column logic

Testing planned or performed, if any:

• aux_clm Derecho
• aux_clm Izumi
• ctsm_sci Derecho
• fates Derecho
• fates Izumi

Requirements before merge:

• I have followed the CTSM contribution guidelines.

• The code in this PR branch builds with no errors.
• The code in this PR branch runs with no errors. Briefly describe tested configuration(s):
• This either (a) does not change answers, (b) it only changes answers at roundoff level, or (c) I have performed a scientific evaluation of the answer changes. Which?: a

• I have reviewed relevant parts of the CLM documentation Tech Note or User's Guide to determine if anything needs to be changed or added. If it does, describe:
• This PR either (a) does not create a need to update the documentation or (b) includes required documentation updates (see guidelines for contributing documentation). Which?: a

[ekluzek]

OK aux_clm testing on Derecho passed as expected. Which shows updating to the latest submodules doesn't change answers and is safe to do in #4180

[slevis-lmwg]

I'm approving preemptively. Other than addressing my comments and any that Erik wrote during the paired review, Erik still needs to include the new github workflow that will run the add_super_testlists script.

Also the python test workflow is failing at the moment (we talked about that).