Improve software-layer-script workflow

[casparvl]

Changes needed to make builds use everything from the cloned software-layer-scripts, instead of from the deployed stuff in software.eessi.io.

This is a starting point for https://gitlab.com/eessi/support/-/issues/217.

Split off from 2422804 which was tested in e.g. EESSI/software-layer#1351 (comment)

We may not want to merge this until we have sufficient checks (CI, bot) in place to ensure that tarballs can only be deployed if they were build from a merge commit of software-layer-scripts. That means we need:

• Software-layer CI to check if upstream software-layer-scripts commit was merged Clone specific software-layer-commit and implement CI to check merged status software-layer#1353
• Bot improvement to check if build was done using the latest bot/commit_sha (i.e. the same one as the CI check uses).

[bedroge]

Just to summarize how this used to work and how it will work after merging this PR:

Previously, an updated hooks file was copied to the CVMFS repo (with the overlay) before the builds were started (by EESSI-install-software.sh), and this was only done if a PR diff file showed that the hooks file was modified by the PR.

In the new situation it will just use the version from the git clone of software-layer-scripts; the build script clones a specific commit of that repo. Additional CI will make sure that software-layer PR tarballs can only be deployed if that commit belongs to a merged PR.

One thing that maybe requires some attention is possible situations where a software layer PR modifies that software-layer-scripts commit, does the builds, and then undoes those changes regarding the used commit. A reviewer may not immediately spot that the builds were done with a different commit (the "Files changed" tab won't show it, you would have to look at individual commits or notice that there was a commit after the builds were done), but maybe the CI or bot itself could also catch that?

[casparvl]

We should make sure we can also pass the $TOPDIR/eb_hooks.py to install_cuda_and_libraries.sh as an optional argument. (since install_cuda_and_libraries.sh loads its own EESSI-extend, just setting an environment variable is not sufficient)

[casparvl]

Suggestion by Bob: instead, let's revise how EESSI-extend behaves: make it listen to an EESSI_EASYBUILD_HOOKS_OVERRIDE variable. That's also useful for sites in general if they want to extend our hooks.

This is also more robust, since any child process that would invoke EESSI-extend will have this environment variable set.