Add compatible claim evidence assessments and study-source types - #692
Open
realmarcin wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
realmarcin wants to merge 1 commit into
realmarcin wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add typed claim-evidence assessments where missing: supports describes how the citation bears on its claim; evidence_source describes the study or data-source type. Newly introduced fields are optional, without defaults.
Use the five established support values and the fleet source vocabulary. Preserve existing citation formats, evidence types, required fields, and the legacy shared quotation-location field. No scientific records are changed or backfilled. Add usage documentation and closed-schema tests that reject conflating study type with curation method or quotation location.
Fleet rationale and contract: CultureBotAI/culturebotai-claw#448
Upstream: https://github.com/diatomsRcool/ecomech/blob/5d3f55467f3caaa6e88eb7f33037e4a8103873a7/docs/traitmech_integration.md
Validation
138 evidence and existing schema tests passed (51 evidence tests).
All existing schema definitions compare unchanged after removing the newly added fields/enum members. Ruff and git diff --check pass. Vendored shared schema files are unchanged.