Add compatible claim evidence assessments and study-source types - #337
Merged
Merged
Conversation
realmarcin
force-pushed
the
feat/evidence-assessment
branch
from
September 20, 2026 22:07
d7fc50f to
69f8aad
Compare
realmarcin
force-pushed
the
feat/evidence-assessment
branch
from
September 20, 2026 22:09
69f8aad to
ca874f9
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add typed claim-evidence assessments where missing: supports describes how the citation bears on its claim; evidence_source describes the study or data-source type. Newly introduced fields are optional, without defaults.
Use the five established support values and the fleet source vocabulary. Preserve existing citation formats, evidence types, required fields, and the legacy shared quotation-location field. No scientific records are changed or backfilled. Add usage documentation and closed-schema tests that reject conflating study type with curation method or quotation location.
Fleet rationale and contract: CultureBotAI/culturebotai-claw#448
Upstream: https://github.com/diatomsRcool/ecomech/blob/5d3f55467f3caaa6e88eb7f33037e4a8103873a7/docs/traitmech_integration.md
Validation
35 evidence and writer tests passed; the new scaffolded schema-history record validates. One corpus roundtrip test skipped because the isolated checkout omits the corpus.
All existing schema definitions compare unchanged after removing the newly added fields/enum members. Ruff and git diff --check pass. Vendored shared schema files are unchanged.