fix: resolve an enum route parameter from a qualified name

[gmpassos]

A route parameter typed as an enum threw when the value arrived as a qualified
name (Currency.brl) — the form Enum.toString() produces, and the one
external callers tend to send:

[SEVERE] Error calling route `updateOrderStatusFromBroker` of module `external_integration`!
parameters: {..., paymentType: PaymentType.creditCard, chargedCurrency: Currency.BRL, ...}
[ERROR] type 'String' is not a subtype of type 'Currency?' of 'chargedCurrency'
#1  Function._apply
#3  MethodInvocation.invoke (package:reflection_factory)
#4  _APIRouteHandlerAPIMethodReflection.callImpl (package:bones_api/src/bones_api_module.dart:1788)

Cause

EnumReflection.from only read a bare value name, so the qualified form parsed
to null, APIRouteBuilder.resolveValueByType fell back to the value it was
given, and the raw String reached Function.apply. The bare name (brl), in
any case, already resolved.

Fixed upstream in reflection_factory: ^2.10.0, which accepts the qualified
form and requires the prefix to match the reflected enumName, so a String
from a different enum still resolves to null rather than matching by value
name.

Changes

• deps: reflection_factory: ^2.9.0 → ^2.10.0 (regenerated the test
  reflection files: builder version line only).
• New test/bones_api_route_enum_parameter_test.dart, reproducing the
  production call — an external_integration module with an
  updateOrderStatusFromBroker route taking PaymentType? and Currency?.
  Five cases: qualified name (the failing one), bare name, case-insensitive
  name, JSON payload, and omitted (null) enum parameters.
• Version 1.16.0 → 1.16.1, in pubspec.yaml, BonesAPI.VERSION and the
  CHANGELOG.

Test

The new test fails on 2.9.0 (qualified-name case only) and passes on 2.10.0.
The full local suite was not re-run for this PR — CI covers it.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01RVuPYBSbnLEWVqPXTcmZU2

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.33%. Comparing base (b1fa4c4) to head (cdf2ec1).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #155      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.31%   68.33%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          66       66              
  Lines       22322    22322              
==========================================
+ Hits        15250    15254       +4     
+ Misses       7072     7068       -4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	68.33% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.